I'm thinking it would be a good idea to standardize on one C/C++ compiler for
the
project. I'm looking at the Open Watcom compiler and would like your opinion
OK, see below ...
I'd like to see gcc for all 32- and 64-bit development
What's the design goal ???
it really needs to
be
Now, I will have to disclose that I have not tried jwasm. There's no
reason
behind that except for laziness. Having learned nasm and finding it met
my
needs, I just didn't try jwasm because I didn't want to learn it. So, I
cannot compare nasm to it.
I can't really compare NASM to it
...@freedos.org wrote:
From: Pat Villani p...@freedos.org
Subject: [Freedos-devel] Standardized development tools
To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Saturday, August 21, 2010, 12:44 AM
Folks,
I'm thinking it would be a good idea to standardize on one C/C++ compiler for
the project. I'm looking
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 12:44 AM, Pat Villani p...@freedos.org wrote:
Folks,
I'm thinking it would be a good idea to standardize on one C/C++ compiler
for the project. I'm looking at the Open Watcom compiler and would like
your opinion. Reason for this suggestion is that it is the only real
To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2010 6:44 AM
Subject: [Freedos-devel] Standardized development tools
Folks,
I'm thinking it would be a good idea to standardize on one C/C++ compiler for
the project. I'm looking at the Open Watcom compiler and would like
...@freedos.org
Subject: [Freedos-devel] Standardized development tools
To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Saturday, August 21, 2010, 12:44 AM
Folks,
I'm thinking it would be a good idea to standardize on one C/C++ compiler
for the project. I'm looking at the Open Watcom compiler
Thanks Jeremy. I've been playing with the kernel for the last few days and
building it with OW v1.9. All looks quite good and the kernel seems to
behave properly.
I definitely agree that source code should be written to be as portable as
possible, and we can achieve that by coding to a standard
@lists.sourceforge.net
*Sent:* Saturday, August 21, 2010 6:44 AM
*Subject:* [Freedos-devel] Standardized development tools
Folks,
I'm thinking it would be a good idea to standardize on one C/C++ compiler
for the project. I'm looking at the Open Watcom compiler and would like
your opinion. Reason
At 05:33 AM 8/21/2010, Walt Nagel wrote:
Another possibility worth considering is MinGW/GCC. As long as GCC
is under development, by extension, MinGW will be, as well. The
question here would be, do you want to use Windows, Linux or DOS as
the development platform -- Windows allows a smoother
I'm thinking it would be a good idea to standardize on one C/C++ compiler
for the project. [...]
I would be interested in your opinions about standardizing one or several
assemblers for the project. I think that the kernel and FreeCOM assembler
source files currently use NASM, a 2-clause
Well, I wasn't going to consider the assembler yet because I didn't want to
stir things up too much, but now that you ask ...
I have a lot of experience with a lot of assemblers on a lot of machines. I
was never too fond of masm, although I did write a lot of code using it. I
preferred (note
Regardless of what is finally settled on for use, it really needs to
be something that works from the freedos environment itself. It would
be kind of silly to tell folks that they need a windows machine just
to recompile some code they're currently already using.
If that's open watcom,
Good point.
Pat
Project Coordinator
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Travis Siegel tsie...@softcon.com wrote:
Regardless of what is finally settled on for use, it really needs to
be something that works from the freedos environment itself. It would
be kind of silly to tell folks that they
Folks,
I'm thinking it would be a good idea to standardize on one C/C++ compiler
for the project. I'm looking at the Open Watcom compiler and would like
your opinion. Reason for this suggestion is that it is the only real mode
compiler still under development and supported.
This doesn't mean
14 matches
Mail list logo
