David O'Shea schreef:
Fixed, I put a download link for the existing releases on
there and mentioned that they are pretty much identical to what is in
CVS. I also put an "alpha" version on there which is my code in its
current state which I think is not too bad..
not too bad at all, indeed.
Hi Bernd,
>Having all of my notes on a web page that everyone can see,
> and using a tool which is very quick to edit those nodes so that I am
> more likely to keep them up-to-date, will be of great benefit to
> everyone when I suddenly disappear from the community :)
But the page doesn
hello David, thanks for your response.
David O'Shea schreef:
Having all of my notes on a web page that everyone can see,
and using a tool which is very quick to edit those nodes so that I am
more likely to keep them up-to-date, will be of great benefit to
everyone when I suddenly disappea
Hi Bernd,
Bernd Blaauw wrote:
David O'Shea schreef:
> I put a bunch of notes at http://wiki.fdos.org/Main/Mem I have
> done
> just about everything except /FREE (should be simple like /MODULE
> since
> it just means filtering the list) and your suggestion of
> /NOSUMMARY
> (should be easy t
Hi Aitor,
Hi,
David O'Shea escribi=F3:
> I got Eric to forward on an email to him from me but I didn't get
> a=20
> response, possibly due to Hotmail being extremely agressive with
> spam=20
> filtering (if that is the case, my apologies go out to GNU_man!).
SourceForge is also quite agress
Aitor Santamaría Merino wrote:
> Very nice, forgive me for my ignorance with wikis.
Interestingly I installed PmWiki to my webspace some days ago too. ;-)
> I've seen that MEM is a Topic under "Main", is there a way to see the
> "tree" of all the topics under "Main"? The obvious stuff didn't wor
Hi,
Eric Auer escribió:
FreeDOS passes that strange tests, but the real problem is with
32bit mode (Win 3.1 /3 mode and default mode of WfW 3.11, actually
WfW 3.11 runs only in a stripped down safe mode if you tell it to
disable all 32bit drivers and stuff). This mode does real
multitasking with
Hi,
Bernd Blaauw escribió:
http://wiki.fdos.org/Main/Todo_1_0
- can somebody name a few tools for which the wrong errorlevels are
returned? I assume it would not be too hard to fix them. Which EL are
used by DYNALOAD, by the way? http://wiki.fdos.org/Main/ExitCodes
http://home.earthlink
Hi,
Eric Auer escribió:
Stable kernel supports at least 2 countries - Germany and USA - so
people can test whether NLS date/time format selection has an effect.
This does not need nlsfunc or country sys...
Because current implementation of COUNTRY= is hardcoded, but would need
COUNTRY.SYS if
Hi,
Eric Auer escribió:
DEFRAG was taken off the list, because so many freeware / shareware /
commercial defraggers exist - or because many people run FreeDOS in a
DOS emulator like VMWare or DOSemu, and defraggers aren't needed...
I disagree here. I have no idea what happened to Imre more t
Hi,
David O'Shea escribió:
Hi Bernd,
> - MEM, good that David is working on it :-).
Yes, though no idea what he's planning to change/add
I put a bunch of notes at http://wiki.fdos.org/Main/Mem I have done
Very nice, forgive me for my ignorance with wikis.
I've seen that MEM is a Topic
Hi,
David O'Shea escribió:
I got Eric to forward on an email to him from me but I didn't get a
response, possibly due to Hotmail being extremely agressive with spam
filtering (if that is the case, my apologies go out to GNU_man!).
SourceForge is also quite agressive with this, it will not all
Hi,
Eric Auer escribió:
FreeDOS passes that strange tests, but the real problem is with
32bit mode (Win 3.1 /3 mode and default mode of WfW 3.11, actually
WfW 3.11 runs only in a stripped down safe mode if you tell it to
disable all 32bit drivers and stuff). This mode does real
multitasking with
Hi,
Eric Auer escribió:
Stable kernel supports at least 2 countries - Germany and USA - so
people can test whether NLS date/time format selection has an effect.
This does not need nlsfunc or country sys...
Because current implementation of COUNTRY= is hardcoded, but would need
COUNTRY.SYS if t
Hi,
Bernd Blaauw escribió:
http://wiki.fdos.org/Main/Todo_1_0
- can somebody name a few tools for which the wrong errorlevels are
returned? I assume it would not be too hard to fix them. Which EL are
used by DYNALOAD, by the way? http://wiki.fdos.org/Main/ExitCodes
http://home.earthlink
Hi,
Eric Auer escribió:
DEFRAG was taken off the list, because so many freeware / shareware /
commercial defraggers exist - or because many people run FreeDOS in a
DOS emulator like VMWare or DOSemu, and defraggers aren't needed...
I disagree here. I have no idea what happened to Imre more t
David O'Shea schreef:
I put a bunch of notes at http://wiki.fdos.org/Main/Mem I have done
just about everything except /FREE (should be simple like /MODULE since
it just means filtering the list) and your suggestion of /NOSUMMARY
(should be easy too of course). I have also not done any work o
Hi Bernd,
> - MEM, good that David is working on it :-).
Yes, though no idea what he's planning to change/add
I put a bunch of notes at http://wiki.fdos.org/Main/Mem I have done
just about everything except /FREE (should be simple like /MODULE
since it just means filtering the list) and yo
> > I said not long ago that running windows on FreeDOS is not a real test,
> it would be a test, and it would fail. FreeDOS kernel isn't compatible
> enough to run Windows 3.x
> end of story.
Hm. Then why does Windows 3.1 "win /s" run, except DOS boxes, for me?
I see that there is not much ongoi
-fat16 and fat32 bootsector not working.
WHAT? You mean you cannot boot FreeDOS from anything else than
a FAT12 drive at the moment? Sounds very bad...
Then it should be made absolutely clear that people have to use
the old stable SYS version, along with exact information WHICH
SYS version to
Eric Auer schreef:
About SYS itself:
-fat16 and fat32 bootsector not working.
WHAT? You mean you cannot boot FreeDOS from anything else than
a FAT12 drive at the moment? Sounds very bad...
Then it should be made absolutely clear that people have to use
the old stable SYS version, along with e
Hi...
> I said not long ago that running windows on FreeDOS is not a real test,
> let me explain why: Windows at some point included some very complicated
> locking mechanism to *avoid* windows running other DOSes.
This was about Windows 3.1 and later versions, MS checked for some
nonsense pro
hi Bernd...
No I do not feel like making cdrcache a part of shsucdx.
Nice manuals on http://home.earthlink.net/~rlively/MANUALS/INDEX.HTM
but they document no errorlevels for dynaload to be present...
Stable kernel supports at least 2 countries - Germany and USA - so
people can test whether NLS
Eric Auer schreef:
DEFRAG was taken off the list, because so many freeware / shareware /
commercial defraggers exist - or because many people run FreeDOS in a
DOS emulator like VMWare or DOSemu, and defraggers aren't needed...
Jim means defraggers for DOS? FreeDOS may still aim at the embedded
Eric Auer wrote:
> - What are experiences with Jason's RAMDISK, good enough to drop TDSK and
Are you talking about http://www.geocities.com/jadoxa/shsufdrv/ ?
Or did you mean Marko Kohtala's srdisk?
Robert Riebisch
--
BTTR Software
http://www.bttr-software.de/
Hi Jim...
> http://www.proudlyserving.com/archives/2005/08/dos_aint_done_t.html
> we shouldn't be afraid to throw off 'crutches' that are no
> longer needed" side of the fence...
Sounds like we could discuss the manifesto and 1.0 list again ;-).
http://fd-doc.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php?n=F
26 matches
Mail list logo
