Hi!
25-Фев-2004 08:47 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luchezar Georgiev) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> _Not_ agreed - many distributives contains similar files (readme,
>> what.new, etc.), so MAN should be also "splited".
LG> It's better if the directory tree is as simple as possible, but not simpler.
L
Luchezar Georgiev escribio':
LG> I'd divide *only* SRC into project subdirectories. BIN, INF, HLP,
MAN and
LG> NLS better be common for *all* projects, as they usually contain
only a
LG> single file per project (with some exceptions).
_Not_ agreed - many distributives contains similar files (re
LG> I'd divide *only* SRC into project subdirectories. BIN, INF, HLP, MAN and
LG> NLS better be common for *all* projects, as they usually contain only a
LG> single file per project (with some exceptions).
_Not_ agreed - many distributives contains similar files (readme,
what.new, etc.), so MA
..
>Otherwise, I agree with Arkady. No need to have 50 files called COPYING with equal
>contents ;-)
..
We don't (well not really).
Within the distribution there is a package called GPLv2,
which contains nothing but the GPL license which is installed
to the base dirctory (e.g. C:\DOS\COPYING ).
Hi!
24-Фев-2004 20:44 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luchezar Georgiev) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
LG> Yet another 3-letter maniac's proposal ;-)
LG> DOS\BIN executable files
LG> DOS\LSM linux software map files
LG> DOS\HLP help files
LG> DOS\MAN manuals and other documentation
LG> DOS\NLS
Hi,
Luchezar Georgiev escribio':
Yet another 3-letter maniac's proposal ;-)
DOS\BIN executable files
DOS\LSM linux software map files
DOS\HLP help files
DOS\MAN manuals and other documentation
DOS\NLS national language support
DOS\SRC source code, divided into project subdirectories
I'd divide *
