Hi!
8-Фев-2004 16:48 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bart Oldeman) wrote to
FreeDOS-kernel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> As to the other funny printf "patch", it's only a temporary solution
>> until I find the reason why Borland 80386 build hangs if any INSTALL=
>> commands were processed, just before kernel() ente
Hello Bart,
I regularly miss messages from the SF mailing lists since 1-2 weeks. So I have to wade through the big traffic web interface to find out what's out. This way I found your reply to my message below:
> + if ((result & (IS_NETWORK | IS_DEVICE)) == IS_NETWORK)
> {
> int status;
On Sun, 8 Feb 2004, Luchezar Georgiev wrote:
> Thanks for applying my patches, Bart! I see you improved some of them -
> great! But I have to note that the above patch does NOT fix the EJECT
> bug! ONLY when I appied the patch at my
> http://linux.tu-varna.acad.bg/~lig/freedos/CVSPATCH.TXT to your
Hi!
8-Фев-2004 15:12 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luchezar Georgiev) wrote to FreeDOS-kernel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> - if ((mode & CDS_MODE_CHECK_DEV_PATH) && (result & IS_DEVICE) &&
>> - !(result & IS_NETWORK) && dest[2] != '/' && !dir_exists(dest))
>> + if ((mode & CDS_MODE_CHECK_DEV_PATH) &&
>> +
Hi,
Here are more specific details on the Borland bug. If and ONLY if BOTH of the following are true:
1) Kernel was built for 80386 with Borland C 3.1 to 5.2 (tried 3.1, 4.0, 4.52, 5.2),
AND
2) INSTALLHIGH commands are executed while UMBs are available (I use UMBPCI as UMB
driver),
then the ker
On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 10:16:30 -0800, Bart wrote:
--- newstuff.c 24 Sep 2003 19:34:11 - 1.31
+++ newstuff.c 7 Feb 2004 18:16:27 - 1.32
@@ -602,10 +602,11 @@
}
/* nothing found => continue normally */
}
- if ((mode & CDS_MODE_CHECK_DEV_PATH) && (result & IS_DEVICE)
Салям!
8-Фев-2004 01:28 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bart Oldeman) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> if (drive == 0)
>> drive = default_drive + 1;
>> drive--;
BO> If you like to save 1 byte, then I can save another one
BO> drive--;
BO> if ((int)drive < 0)
BO> drive = default_
