Re: [Freedos-user] Ghostscript

2008-11-15 Thread Eric Auer
Hi, Roberto Perotti pointed me to a solution for: I have been trying - and trying and trying - to read a large multi-page Postscript file  [[the REXX manual]] using FreeDOS.  The pages were too small to read when sent directly to screen.  So I sent pages to the pcxmono driver  [[-NOPAUSE 

[Freedos-user] FreeDOS for Large Scale Storage?

2008-11-15 Thread gdmellott
Hi, I am familiar with DOS and have used FreDOS, though it was some time ago. What is the present outlook for an endeavor to use FreeDOS to run older machines with K6-2 processors [typically 400-500mHz], using a RAID card and making some large storage, to archive data on over a network? I

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS for Large Scale Storage?

2008-11-15 Thread David C. Kerber
I'm no authority on it, but my experience with using FreeDOS as a file server was not encouraging. I used the MS networking services that came with WFW 3.11, and it was functional but unacceptably slow. At the time (a few months ago), nobody had a suggestion of a faster set of server

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS for Large Scale Storage?

2008-11-15 Thread Eric Auer
Hi! ... endeavor to use FreeDOS to run older machines with K6-2 No problem. processors [typically 400-500mHz], using a RAID card and making some large storage Only hardware RAID supported (RAID card) but not software RAID. Also only FAT supported, no journaling or otherwise feature-rich,

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS for Large Scale Storage?

2008-11-15 Thread gdmellott
Hi Eric, Thanks for responding... If you wish you can respond to some questions I've inserted into the message. Eric Auer-3 wrote: Hi! ... endeavor to use FreeDOS to run older machines with K6-2 No problem. processors [typically 400-500mHz], using a RAID card and making some

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS for Large Scale Storage?

2008-11-15 Thread gdmellott
Hi David, Thanks for responding. An answer and questions are mixed in with your response, if you wish to address them. David C. Kerber wrote: I'm no authority on it, but my experience with using FreeDOS as a file server was not encouraging. I used the MS networking services that came

[Freedos-user] Status of freedos 1.1

2008-11-15 Thread robinson-west user
What is the outlook for freedos 1.1? I'd like to see improved stability overall, better networking options, and integration of the package manager into a gui. Gem is great because it is light and that's what freedos should be, light on resource use. I think there should be some discussion on