On Friday 03 April 2009 06:12, Blair Campbell wrote:
> arj is open-source (http://arj.sourceforge.net/) and pkzip afaik can
> be redistributed (but not the source).
Hi!
I think Alain is right. I didn't bothered checking before (I naively assumed
that such old tools would be at least freeware by
On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 16:20:40 +0100, I waved a wand and this message
magically appears in front of Eric Auer:
> Indeed a very annoying bug in FreeCOM 0.84 but nobody has yet found
> a way to predict WHEN it happens. If you can find a way to make it
> happen at a more specific time than "after a whi
I believe Info-ZIP has a suitable replacement for PKware's DOS pkzip and
pkunzip (ftp://ftp.info-zip.org/pub/infozip/msdos/).
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 3:14 AM, Mateusz Viste wrote:
> On Friday 03 April 2009 06:12, Blair Campbell wrote:
> > arj is open-source (http://arj.sourceforge.net/) and pkzip
I'm still stumped as to why fdupdate works on my Pentium 4,
but it doesn't work on my 486.
When I run memtest 2.1.1 for dos, it doesn't find any errors.
When I run ssh2dos, it works.
When I run fdupdate, it crashes with a 2 near fnodes error.
I wish I knew exactly what is causing the crash.
F
Mateusz Viste escreveu:
>
> As for ARJ (I am not talking about the OpenSource one, which is another
> program), it is freeware. May be downloaded without restrictions from ARJ's
> website, as far as we use it for a home usage.
> http://www.arjsoftware.com/files.htm
No, it is not freeware, jus
King InuYasha escreveu:
> I believe Info-ZIP has a suitable replacement for PKware's DOS pkzip and
> pkunzip (ftp://ftp.info-zip.org/pub/infozip/msdos/).
Yes, it is compatible, just has a different command line (more unix
like). I made the switch many years ago :)
Definnetly ZIP and UNZIP shou
On Friday 03 April 2009 16:56, Alain M. wrote:
> UNARJ.EXE may be freely used and distributed.
Doesn't matter anyway - I just checked my repository, and there is only the
OpenSource version of ARJ, so no license problem there :)
Regards,
Mateusz
--
You'll find my public OpenPGP key at http://ww
On Friday 03 April 2009 16:08, Michael Robinson wrote:
> When I run fdupdate, it crashes with a 2 near fnodes error.
Hi,
Please define the crash. When exactly is it happening? When FDUPDATE is
starting itself, or when it run wget to retrieve the repository list?
That's a verry important informa
Is fdupdate compiled with SSE or MMX or any other special instruction sets
that are unavailable in 486? If so, just recompile with those disabled.
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Michael Robinson
wrote:
> I'm still stumped as to why fdupdate works on my Pentium 4,
> but it doesn't work on my 486.
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Alain M. wrote:
>
> King InuYasha escreveu:
> > I believe Info-ZIP has a suitable replacement for PKware's DOS pkzip and
> > pkunzip (ftp://ftp.info-zip.org/pub/infozip/msdos/).
>
> Yes, it is compatible, just has a different command line (more unix
> like). I mad
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 17:12 +0200, Mateusz Viste wrote:
> On Friday 03 April 2009 16:08, Michael Robinson wrote:
> > When I run fdupdate, it crashes with a 2 near fnodes error.
>
> Hi,
>
> Please define the crash. When exactly is it happening? When FDUPDATE is
> starting itself, or when it run
--- Blair Campbell schrieb am Fr, 3.4.2009:
> IIRC chkdsk does not support FAT32 filesystems. This might
> be your issue.
No, it's a FAT16 filesystem. When I boot MS-DOS 6.22 from CD it
can read it fine and its chkdsk doesn't report any problems.
chris
> I'm not certain about what is crashing. Changing to curl makes no
> difference at all. This works on my Pentium 4, so I suspect there is
> something specific to my 486 that is causing the problem. I wish the
> crash message was more descriptive. A dump of the processor's registers
> and more
> What is an fnode? What does a message that more than 2 near fnodes
> are opened mean?
The fnodes are a special data structure used inside the FreeDOS kernel.
The F apparently stands for file, because the fnode contains information
about an accessed file. Early versions of the kernel used to
Hi all!
It has been a long time that the "poor translation management" was bothering
me. There is no easy way to know what needs to be translated, and what is
already translated but not shipped with the package for whatever reason.
I worked a moment today on a new project: The FreeDOS localisat
15 matches
Mail list logo
