and - BTW - FreeDOS does NOT want to be a Windows 9x replacement.
Of course not. It wants to be a MS-DOS replacement. The initial question
wasn't to transform FreeDOS into a GUI magically but to create a new
project for a GUI running on FreeDOS.
Before I even try messing with hx extender
???
does anyone know if it will work out-of-the-box with djgpp
HX has a DGJPP hack, untested by me (ask FloX)
which I am used to, and I don't trust having two compilers
of the same language present simultaneously.
HX is NOT a compiler.
Also,
Ok, I give up; I knew that linux has 'make' and 'make install' all over the
place,
but, until this afternoon, I never knew that dos has it.
NO.
While attempting to install some parts of HX and GEM to djgpp, I was struck
by this: use 'make' to configure the includes(headers) and libraries,
kurt godel wrote:
Ok, I give up; I knew that linux has 'make' and 'make install' all
over the place, but, until this afternoon,
I never knew that dos has it. While attempting to install some parts
of HX and GEM to djgpp, I was struck
by this: use 'make' to configure the includes(headers)
Ahhh, it's amazing; not one tutorial specifically for the dos version of
'make'; even what there is, not too
specific. To wit: indeed, some thing you are trying to install,say , HX,
GEM, etc., they do include makefiles,
but they don't tell you where to put the makefile. So, you keep trying to
use
- Original Message -
From: kurt godel
To: freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 12:11 PM
Subject: [Freedos-user] make-me crazy.
Ahhh, it's amazing; not one tutorial specifically for the dos version of
'make'; even what there is, not too
I know HX is not a compiler; I meant having two c++ compilers, like mingw
and djgpp at the same
time. They can have naming conflicts.--kurtwb2...@gmail.com.
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out
Yes, I prettymuch get that, but for instance that djgpp hack someone
mentioned; it has a file named
'makefile', but in what directory should it be placed? I mean, there are
*several* files in these distros
named 'makefile', so without messing around with the path, if I explicitly
use make -f
Hello
Ahhh, it's amazing; not one tutorial specifically for the dos version of
'make'; even what there is, not too
specific. To wit: indeed, some thing you are trying to install,say , HX,
GEM, etc., they do include makefiles,
[snip]
You mentioned HX so I'm forced to feel somewhat
Each directory that has stuff to be built has its own (customized)
makefile. From the DOS command line, cd to the desired directory,
and run command make or make install (as appropriate). This results
in the directory's files being built (using the information in
'makefile').
Sometimes
Eric Auer escreveu:
The usual
Linux configure, make, make install steps are not so common for
DOS apps.
in fact, it works so well in Linux/Unix because the whole system was
designed for it to work.
in DOS you most of the time cannot the make program that you want. Keep
in mind that each
(Prior posters' names deleted to protect the guilty)
and - BTW - FreeDOS does NOT want to be a Windows 9x replacement.
Of course not. It wants to be a MS-DOS replacement.
It continually amazes me how, especially in the Free Software world,
non-sentient things like software, information,
Yes, but the project was formulated with a clear object: Create a free
replacement for MS-DOS.
And take 10+ years to get it !!!
Create a free replacement for a Win9x system is a bigger objective,
and is different enough to be a different project.
2009/6/17, Mike Webb weeble7...@gmail.com:
I like this. Why not release it now?
--
--
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Marco A. Achury
Tel: +58-(212)-6158777
Cel: +58-(414)-3142282
Fax: +58-(212)-2410828
Skype: marcoachury
www.geocities.com/marcoachury
--
Crystal Reports - New
14 matches
Mail list logo
