At 05:52 PM 5/27/2010, Martin Woodhouse wrote:
>Hi Conan
>
>That wouldn't be Borland C, would it? I built an entire e-book
>writing-reading-publishing suite for DOS using Borland C in 1989-91
No, that wouldn't.
As already mentioned, the compiler he is looking for is now called
"Digital Mars C/C
Hi Conan
That wouldn't be Borland C, would it? I built an entire e-book
writing-reading-publishing suite for DOS using Borland C in 1989-91
Cheers
Martwww.martin-woodhouse.co.uk
From: Conan Kudo
I was wondering if anyone knows more than there is on wikipedia? I'd be
interested in findi
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 23:00 +0100, Liam Proven wrote:
> Ahhh... 17-18Y ago, DOS memory optimisation by hand was one of my
> particular tricks. I was quite the expert. Completely obsolete skill
> now, though.
>
> My suggestion would be to find a copy of QEMM386 and run Quarterdeck's
> OPTIMIZE on y
> >>Ahhh... 17-18Y ago, DOS memory optimisation by hand was one of my
> >>particular tricks. I was quite the expert. Completely obsolete skill
> >>now, though.
Why use qemm86? Doesn't freedos have a newer/better **emm86?
JEMM386
People where i work have already tried to optimize memory for the
pr
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Tony Cappellini wrote:
>
> I am currently loading PCNFS drivers under MSDOS.
> With everything loaded high (as much as possible) I am left with only 462K
> bytes let for applications.
>
> This isn't enough for what I need to do. If I don't load the PCNFS stuff, I
>
Oops, i wasn't aware that my e-mail provider will silently send all mail as
HTML attachment. So i now try it again, hoping that it will be sent as plain
ascii this time. Here it comes . . .
Hello everybody,
I just want to announce that a new version of my DOSUTILS package is available.
It i
I am currently loading PCNFS drivers under MSDOS.
With everything loaded high (as much as possible) I am left with only 462K
bytes let for applications.
This isn't enough for what I need to do. If I don't load the PCNFS stuff, I
can run the application just fine, but then I don't have
access to ou
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 14:10 +0200, Robert Riebisch wrote:
> wrote:
>
> > I'd be grateful if I could be pointed in the right direction. Many
> > thanks!
>
> http://www.bttr-software.de/links/#proglib
I'm delighted, thanks a lot!
--
http://www.munted.org.uk
One very high maintenance cat living
wrote:
> I'd be grateful if I could be pointed in the right direction. Many
> thanks!
http://www.bttr-software.de/links/#proglib
Robert Riebisch
--
BTTR Software
http://www.bttr-software.de/
--
__
I've been trying to find the latest sources for WATTCP-32, the protected
mode TCP/IP library for DOS. All links lead to a dead site or the wrong
16 bit DOS version.
I'd be grateful if I could be pointed in the right direction. Many
thanks!
--
http://www.munted.org.uk
One very high maintenance c
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 23:29 -0500, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
> The compiler (for DOS) hasn't seen any major updates since 1999.
> Though that may not be as much of a problem for DOS, but OpenWatcom
> would be a better choice I think.
That's fine, I'm only interested in the original Zorland/Zort
11 matches
Mail list logo
