On 2017-11-05 01:48, geneb wrote:
On Sat, 4 Nov 2017, userbeit...@abwesend.de wrote:
Isn't that exactly what JPSoftware did with 4DOS?
And speaking of it, 4DOS isn't free - it is specifically restricted
to FreeDOS, which makes it non-free.
Which is basically nonsense because the person that
Hi!
On 2017-11-05 00:48, Jim Hall wrote:
On Sat, 04 Nov 2017 20:09:48 +0100, userbeitrag wrote:
I'm also thinking that FreeDOS should include a not-so-free and even a
non-free section of software. The only limit should be restriction of
redistribution.
On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Mateusz
On Sun, 05 Nov 2017 16:48:00 +0100, userbeitrag wrote:
> What I'm saying is that you might consider allowing additional software,
> either in the main distribution, or - which would be even better: to
> allow the addition of easy to set-up additional repositories
This has been possible for years a
Am 2017-11-05 um 16:55 schrieb Mateusz Viste:
On Sun, 05 Nov 2017 16:48:00 +0100, userbeitrag wrote:
What I'm saying is that you might consider allowing additional software,
either in the main distribution, or - which would be even better: to
allow the addition of easy to set-up additional repos
On Sun, 05 Nov 2017 17:58:54 +0100, userbeitrag wrote:
> The truth is I don't have the time nor the resources. Sorry.
For someone with no time you sure write awfully long mails. Might be time
better spent doing actual stuff.
> svarog386 is a good idea, but I would prefer to install the official
On 2017-11-05 19:32, Mateusz Viste wrote:
On Sun, 05 Nov 2017 17:58:54 +0100, userbeitrag wrote:
The truth is I don't have the time nor the resources. Sorry.
For someone with no time you sure write awfully long mails. Might be time
better spent doing actual stuff.
I type fast... ;-) But, yeah
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 9:48 AM, wrote:
> What I'm saying is that you might consider allowing additional software,
> either in the main distribution, or - which would be even better: to allow
> the addition of easy to set-up additional repositories, so that users can
> easily get freeware that is
>> On Sat, 4 Nov 2017, userbeit...@abwesend.de wrote:
>>> Isn't that exactly what JPSoftware did with 4DOS?
>>> And speaking of it, 4DOS isn't free - it is specifically restricted to
>>> FreeDOS, which makes it non-free.
>>>
> On 2017-11-05 01:48, geneb wrote:
>> Which is basically nonsense becaus
You might list dos payfor software, a link to it, price ,
and user rating. If people get paid there might be more
activity in some types of sofware. I have a dos version
of PIXEL, looks just like windows. My copy is crippled
but I'd be happy to buy a full version if it every exists.
Put some money
There are already several replies to this which I haven't read yet. So
I might be missing or repeating something. But I'm going to reply
anyways.
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 9:48 AM, wrote:
>
> I understand that the development of FreeDOS needs to be free as in freedom
> as in open source. It makes
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 10:58 AM, wrote:
>
> svarog386 is a good idea, but I would prefer to install the official FreeDOS
> distro and than add software from something like deb-multimedia in the
> Debian world. Again, the keyword is trust.
The FSF won't even link to us because we link to pro
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Jim Hall wrote:
>
> I helped JP Software with the source code release to 4DOS, and the
> license was my greatest mistake in open source software.
>
> In retrospect, I should have stuck to my original suggestion to use the GNU
> GPL.
You can always ask upstrea
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Dale E Sterner wrote:
>
> You might list dos payfor software, a link to it, price ,
> and user rating. If people get paid there might be more
> activity in some types of sofware. I have a dos version
> of PIXEL, looks just like windows. My copy is crippled
> bu
13 matches
Mail list logo
