Re: [Freedos-user] Tinyasm vs. NASM

2019-10-26 Thread Rugxulo
Hi, On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 11:08 AM TK Chia wrote: > > > But it's missing "[var+BX]" Effective Address support. > > Also, "MOV AX,..." (etc.) instructions use the bigger, non-optimal > > encodings. > > Well, perhaps there are ways to fix the support for these things in > tinyasm...

Re: [Freedos-user] Tinyasm vs. NASM (was: Re: A neat find on /r/asm)

2019-10-26 Thread C. Masloch
On at 2019-10-26 03:09 -0500, Rugxulo wrote: >> I also worked some on an 8086tiny fork of mine recently. There are >> several bugfixes there, as well as implementing all 186 instructions, so >> it might be worth testing. It's at https://github.com/ecm-pushbx/8086tiny/ > > I tested all of this unde

Re: [Freedos-user] Tinyasm vs. NASM (was: Re: A neat find on /r/asm)

2019-10-26 Thread Rugxulo
Hi, (sorry for delay in testing) On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 10:17 AM C. Masloch wrote: > > On at 2019-10-05 18:49 -0500, Rugxulo wrote: > > "Unfortunately, nasm doesn't run over 8086/8088 processors,and I > > couldn't find a compatible assembler!" > > > > Strange. I was lightly playing with 8086tinyp