Hi,
On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 1:44 PM Matej Horvat wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 21:39:55 +0100, C. Masloch wrote:
> > I'd be interested in this. I'm using Mercurial for my own projects.
>
> I have put the instructions here:
> http://matejhorvat.si/en/dos/hg/
I don't know either Python nor
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 21:39:55 +0100, C. Masloch wrote:
I'd be interested in this. I'm using Mercurial for my own projects.
I have put the instructions here:
http://matejhorvat.si/en/dos/hg/
___
Freedos-user mailing list
My reply is at the bottom. Please put your reply there too.
On Sun, 16 Feb 2020, Andy Stamp wrote:
Hello,
I've starting working on a game and some small dual monitor (VGA + MDA)
utilities but have run into issues where the code used to work and now it
doesn't. We use subversion, cvs, and git
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 2:23 PM tom ehlert wrote:
>
> > On 16/02/2020 22:54, tom ehlert wrote:
> >> doing programming *on* DOS in 2020 is just stupid.
>
> > Why would that be more stupid than programming *for* DOS in 2020?
> > A hobby is a hobby.
>
> ok. replace 'stupid' by 'inefficient' in the
On Thu, 20 Feb 2020, tom ehlert wrote:
On 16/02/2020 22:54, tom ehlert wrote:
doing programming *on* DOS in 2020 is just stupid.
Why would that be more stupid than programming *for* DOS in 2020?
A hobby is a hobby.
ok. replace 'stupid' by 'inefficient' in the sense that there are
easier
> On 16/02/2020 22:54, tom ehlert wrote:
>> doing programming *on* DOS in 2020 is just stupid.
> Why would that be more stupid than programming *for* DOS in 2020?
> A hobby is a hobby.
ok. replace 'stupid' by 'inefficient' in the sense that there are
easier ways to get useful DOS programs then
On 16/02/2020 22:54, tom ehlert wrote:
doing programming *on* DOS in 2020 is just stupid.
Why would that be more stupid than programming *for* DOS in 2020?
A hobby is a hobby.
Mateusz
___
Freedos-user mailing list
> I've starting working on a game and some small dual monitor (VGA +
> MDA) utilities but have run into issues where the code used to work
> and now it doesn't. We use subversion, cvs, and git at work and I
> was wondering what options are available for dos-based systems besides dated
> zip
On at 2020-02-18 18:25 +0100, Matej Horvat wrote:
> I have managed to get Mercurial 3.4.2 running on DOS semi-reliably (at
> least for local use) with some modifications. I can try to reconstruct
> the steps needed if you want.
I'd be interested in this. I'm using Mercurial for my own projects.
I have managed to get Mercurial 3.4.2 running on DOS semi-reliably (at
least for local use) with some modifications. I can try to reconstruct the
steps needed if you want.
There is also Prism, which was written with the explicit goal of running
on DOS (in real mode, even), but is not
Hi,
CVS and RCS (at least) are available in DJGPP:
http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/
/Tomas
On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 19:26:03 +0100, Andy Stamp wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've starting working on a game and some small dual monitor (VGA +
> MDA) utilities but have run into issues where the code used to work
There were one or more version control systems, at least one on DOS, and
I'll try to dig up a name. I do remember using RCS and SCCS, but they might
have been on later Unix based jobs. RCS was revision control system and
SCCS stood for source code control system.
Bill Dudley
sent from my Linux
Hello,
I've starting working on a game and some small dual monitor (VGA + MDA)
utilities but have run into issues where the code used to work and now it
doesn't. We use subversion, cvs, and git at work and I was wondering what
options are available for dos-based systems besides dated zip files.
13 matches
Mail list logo
