Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS 1.2 needs you

Are you saying Linux over freedos. On Fri, 13 May 2016 17:27:37 -0500 Rugxulo writes: > Hi, > > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Dale E Sterner > wrote: > > > > If Jack's drivers are left out of version 1.2 ; is there > > something to replace them. > >

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS 1.2 needs you

Hi, On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Dale E Sterner wrote: > > If Jack's drivers are left out of version 1.2 ; is there > something to replace them. https://www.kernel.org/ -- Mobile security can

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS 1.2 needs you

If Jack's drivers are left out of version 1.2 ; is there something to replace them. DS On Thu, 12 May 2016 17:19:28 -0500 Rugxulo writes: > Hi, > > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Jerome E. Shidel Jr. > wrote: > > > > So far, I have gone through all

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS 1.2 needs you

> On May 12, 2016, at 6:19 PM, Rugxulo wrote: [..] > https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/distributions/1.0/pkgs/commands.zip [..] Thanks, Jerome -- Mobile security can be

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS 1.2 needs you

Hi, On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Jerome E. Shidel Jr. wrote: > > So far, I have gone through all of the ARCHIVER and BASE packages and have > corrected their LSM data. > > In those groups, these packages have not been solved. > > Unknown license information and will

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS 1.2 needs you

So far, I have gone through all of the ARCHIVER and BASE packages and have corrected their LSM data. In those groups, these packages have not been solved. Unknown license information and will probably be dropped from release, ARCHIVER/ARJ ARCHIVER/ZOO Missing sources, BASE/COMMAND Yet

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS 1.2 needs you

Hi, On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 4:14 AM, Eric Auer wrote: > > Which other DOS apps have HDA? Not many! (But don't forget Judas Player's ALSA/HDA/GPL version.) Sound (or just low-level stuff overall) is probably the weakest link in DOS. Unfortunately, even with relatively good

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS 1.2 needs you

Hi! >> and my sound (Intel high-definition audio) has no DOS support from what >> I read on this emailing list, > > No universal or "good" support, but a very very few DOS apps do have > (some) limited HDA support. Which? Mpxplay, maybe a port of mplayer, experimental ports of the HX DOS

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS 1.2 needs you

Hi, On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Thomas Mueller wrote: > > I think there is only one web browser, Dillo? Not sure about "official" repo or packages (as there's too many files to keep close track of, IMHO). > Are others available as add-ons: Lynx, Links-GUI, Arachne? I

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS 1.2 needs you

I see your (Jerome Shidel) list of packages, BASE and ALL, no need to quote the list. I think there is only one web browser, Dillo? Are others available as add-ons: Lynx, Links-GUI, Arachne? I can't think of any other current or recent web browsers for DOS. This so far is mainly a matter of

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS 1.2 needs you

Updated list of packages that still need LSM data and License version verification. ; FreeDOS Installer Package List File ; BASE Packages archiver\unzip archiver\zip base\assign base\attrib base\chkdsk base\choice base\command base\comp base\cpidos base\ctmouse base\debug base\defrag

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS 1.2 needs you

Hi! > XMGR along with UIDE and several other packages have been dropped from > FreeDOS 1.2. > > This was not my decision. But, I completely agree with the reasoning behind > their removal. There were small doubts about XMGR being clean-room without MS HIMEM contamination but no other

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS 1.2 needs you

Thanks Jerome, that they were still in the REPO is what threw me off. I have already eliminated them from all my configurations. On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Jerome E. Shidel Jr. wrote: > > > What did we decide about XMGR? > > XMGR along with UIDE and several other

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS 1.2 needs you

> What did we decide about XMGR? XMGR along with UIDE and several other packages have been dropped from FreeDOS 1.2. This was not my decision. But, I completely agree with the reasoning behind their removal. These are still available on the ibiblio repository. So, if you really need them in

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS 1.2 needs you

What did we decide about XMGR? On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Jerome Shidel wrote: > > > So you just want us to weed out the license-incompatible ones?? > > That is only part of what is needed. > Some packages have wrong or old license information. For example, some > have

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS 1.2 needs you

> So you just want us to weed out the license-incompatible ones?? That is only part of what is needed. Some packages have wrong or old license information. For example, some have switched from GPL to BSD. Others, are listed as GPL, but are actually GPLv2. And so on. >> base\ctmouse > >

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS 1.2 needs you

Hi, On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 5:52 AM, Jerome E. Shidel Jr. wrote: > > FreeDOS 1.2 needs your help verifying package information. This is one of the > main holdups for the > next OS release. Verifying this data is correct is essential. Especially the > the licensing

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS 1.2 needs you

I made a XDEL utility, clone of DRDO's but it was happily forgotten :( Alain On 06-05-2016 07:52, Jerome E. Shidel Jr. wrote: > Hello All, > > FreeDOS 1.2 needs your help verifying package information. This is one of the > main holdups for the > next OS release. Verifying this data is correct

[Freedos-user] FreeDOS 1.2 needs you

Hello All, FreeDOS 1.2 needs your help verifying package information. This is one of the main holdups for the next OS release. Verifying this data is correct is essential. Especially the the licensing information. GPL, GPLv2, MIT, BSD …… Other information, such as website, authors and etc,