[Freenet-dev] Don't Talk To Strangers

2000-12-23 Thread Mr . Bad
So, I've been thinking about the MediaEnforcer thing. I know that people seem to believe that it's not justified since the node may not have had the document available before the request, but frankly I think that's too fine a point for chicken-livered ISPs to grasp, and definitely too fine a point

Re: [Freenet-dev] .old, .bak

2000-12-23 Thread Brandon
> So, there's just a ton of dead code in the CVS repository -- stuff > like Freenet/client/old/*, lots of build.sh.old things and etc. > > Are there good reasons not to cvs remove these? They'll still be > available for retrieval if necessary, but they sure do make build > scripts complicated.

[Freenet-dev] .old, .bak

2000-12-23 Thread Mr . Bad
So, there's just a ton of dead code in the CVS repository -- stuff like Freenet/client/old/*, lots of build.sh.old things and etc. Are there good reasons not to cvs remove these? They'll still be available for retrieval if necessary, but they sure do make build scripts complicated. ~Mr. Bad P.S

Re: [Freenet-dev] Time to Branch?

2000-12-23 Thread Gianni Johansson
On Saturday 23 December 2000 01:58, you wrote: > > I am seeing fproxy hang on my machine whenever I request a URI that it > > can't find. I can see from looking at the log that the request has timed > > out but fproxy never returns the "cannot find key" HTML page to the > > browser. > > I found