On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 10:21:00PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 01:10:25PM -0800, Dale Babiy wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 08:53:25PM -0500, news wrote:
> > > And of course browsers *could* implement this functionality themselves.
> >
&g
On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 02:26:00PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote:
> So if I had a penny for every time I see someone say "If only Freenet
> was implemented in C++, then I would love to help", I would be, er,
> looking for some way to offload a lot of change.
I think a lot of this can be explained by l
Ian,
I had a similar problem, with two reinstalls of the freenet software
.3.6 on windows, closing the console window forcibly seemed to work fine
and cause no ill after effects that I have been able to determine.
Cheers/Dale
On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 01:47:19PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote:
> H,
g code would seem more appropiate under the circumstances,
unfortunatly it would be highly platform dependant. I think delegating
the responsibility for this to Fproxy makes the most sense in the long
run.
--
Dale Babiy
"If the internet routes around failure why does www.microsoft.
