Re: [Freenet-dev] Project Reorganisation

2001-01-04 Thread Oskar Sandberg
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 09:16:16PM -0600, Steven Fines wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > > > There is so much whining, but so little constructive critisism. > > Ok, I've got some (not much). How about some class diagrams (UM

Re: [Freenet-dev] Project Reorganisation

2001-01-03 Thread Travis Bemann
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 04:20:50AM +0100, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 08:05:39PM -0500, Travis Bemann wrote: > < > > > But you do have to know all of this stuff to write a full client > > library, which is the problem that I am running into with > > Freenet-Python. There isn'

Re: [Freenet-dev] Project Reorganisation

2001-01-03 Thread Zem
Oskar Sandberg wrote: > > Fred is layered, sure. But there's little or no documentation on how > > classes interact, what they are responsible for, and why they do what > > they do. The architecture isn't documented. > > It's not completely javadoced, but a lot of it is. The classes are docum

Re: [Freenet-dev] Project Reorganisation

2001-01-03 Thread Travis Bemann
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 09:16:16PM -0600, Steven Fines wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > > > There is so much whining, but so little constructive critisism. > > Ok, I've got some (not much). How about some class diagrams (UM

Re: [Freenet-dev] Project Reorganisation

2001-01-03 Thread Steven Fines
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > There is so much whining, but so little constructive critisism. Ok, I've got some (not much). How about some class diagrams (UMLish) to show how the major packages are structured along with the interfaces

Re: [Freenet-dev] Project Reorganisation

2001-01-03 Thread Oskar Sandberg
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 08:05:39PM -0500, Travis Bemann wrote: < > > But you do have to know all of this stuff to write a full client > library, which is the problem that I am running into with > Freenet-Python. There isn't sufficient documentation of the Freenet > 0.3 protocol, and I'm not fami

Re: [Freenet-dev] Project Reorganisation

2001-01-03 Thread Oskar Sandberg
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 01:16:52PM +1100, Zem wrote: > Oskar Sandberg wrote: > > > Ask questions, I'll answer, and then somebody can cut it together into a > > more comprehensive documentation. > > Fair enough. That hasn't been my experience in the past. Perhaps I'm > asking the wrong question

Re: [Freenet-dev] Project Reorganisation

2001-01-03 Thread Zem
Oskar Sandberg wrote: > Ask questions, I'll answer, and then somebody can cut it together into a > more comprehensive documentation. Fair enough. That hasn't been my experience in the past. Perhaps I'm asking the wrong questions. > But it is fairly abstracted and layered. You don't need to un

Re: [Freenet-dev] Project Reorganisation

2001-01-03 Thread Travis Bemann
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 01:49:47AM +0100, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 11:28:32AM +1100, Zem wrote: > <> > > It's not just Whiterose. A new developer needs to learn at least the > > basics of the Freenet protocol before they can tackle Whiterose or > > Fred. The major documen

Re: [Freenet-dev] Project Reorganisation

2001-01-03 Thread Brandon
> Ask questions, I'll answer, and then somebody can cut it together into a > more comprehensive documentation. I know it isn't rational, but I find it > easier to right 500 words in reply to an email than those same words off > my head into a documentation. I found you Client guide very well wri

Re: [Freenet-dev] Project Reorganisation

2001-01-03 Thread Oskar Sandberg
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 11:28:32AM +1100, Zem wrote: <> > It's not just Whiterose. A new developer needs to learn at least the > basics of the Freenet protocol before they can tackle Whiterose or > Fred. The major documents are incorrect or out of date. Anyone asking > questions about the curr

Re: [Freenet-dev] Project Reorganisation

2001-01-03 Thread Zem
Ian Clarke wrote: > So if I had a penny for every time I see someone say "If only Freenet > was implemented in C++, then I would love to help", I would be, er, > looking for some way to offload a lot of change. > > Adam has been working on a C++ implementation for some time now, and has > recei

Re: [Freenet-dev] Project Reorganisation

2000-12-31 Thread Dale Babiy
On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 02:26:00PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote: > So if I had a penny for every time I see someone say "If only Freenet > was implemented in C++, then I would love to help", I would be, er, > looking for some way to offload a lot of change. I think a lot of this can be explained by l

[Freenet-dev] Project Reorganisation

2000-12-31 Thread Ian Clarke
Ok, time for a general ramble: So if I had a penny for every time I see someone say "If only Freenet was implemented in C++, then I would love to help", I would be, er, looking for some way to offload a lot of change. Adam has been working on a C++ implementation for some time now, and has recei