Extremely Affordable Prescript[ion Drug!s!

2003-12-07 Thread Loretta Reed

Re: WinXP Protected EAP (PEAP) MS-CHAPv2

2003-12-07 Thread Thierry LARMIER (QoS Telecom)
Hello Justin, This week I had the same problem than u.  0,9,3 version does not support peap. So u need the latest snapshot. Personally, i have installed the 20031204 snapshot.  ftp.freeradius.org/pub/radius/CVS-snapshots The next problem is, if u want to use peap, you need to activate tls.

SOLVED?! ( was Re: BUG?! (was Re: date type attribute not added to accounting request using attr_rewrite)

2003-12-07 Thread Paul Sijben
I found now WHY a change in attr_rewrite when used in pre-Proxy does not work. It operates on request->packet rather than request->proxy. Now the question is which ought to be fixed; the call to pre-proxy in procy.c or the pre-proxy chain that uses standard calls to operate on the request? I am n

Re: SOLVED?! ( was Re: BUG?! (was Re: date type attribute not added to accounting request using attr_rewrite)

2003-12-07 Thread Alan DeKok
Paul Sijben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I found now WHY a change in attr_rewrite when used in pre-Proxy does not > work. It operates on request->packet rather than request->proxy. That should be fixed. > Now the question is which ought to be fixed; the call to pre-proxy in > procy.c Absolu

Re: SOLVED?! ( was Re: BUG?! (was Re: date type attribute not added to accounting request using attr_rewrite)

2003-12-07 Thread Kostas Kalevras
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, Alan DeKok wrote: > Paul Sijben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I found now WHY a change in attr_rewrite when used in pre-Proxy does not > > work. It operates on request->packet rather than request->proxy. > > That should be fixed. > > > Now the question is which ought to be f

Re: Proxy Setup

2003-12-07 Thread Glenn Plas
>From: "Anson Rinesmith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Proxy Setup >Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 11:57:00 -0600>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>>I want any username like [EMAIL PROTECTED] to be proxied to an existing>rad

Re: SOLVED?! ( was Re: BUG?! (was Re: date type attribute not added to accounting request using attr_rewrite)

2003-12-07 Thread Paul Sijben
Alan DeKok wrote: > Paul Sijben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>I found now WHY a change in attr_rewrite when used in pre-Proxy does not >>work. It operates on request->packet rather than request->proxy. > > > That should be fixed. > > >>Now the question is which ought to be fixed; the call

Re: SOLVED?! ( was Re: BUG?! (was Re: date type attribute not added to accounting request using attr_rewrite)

2003-12-07 Thread Paul Sijben
Ah, I see what you mean. Ok that will work as well ;-) Paul Kostas Kalevras wrote: > On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, Alan DeKok wrote: > > >>Paul Sijben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>I found now WHY a change in attr_rewrite when used in pre-Proxy does not >>>work. It operates on request->packet rather

attribute editing from perl

2003-12-07 Thread Paul Sijben
My questions for this week to solve is; how can I rewrite packets from rlm_perl? We are trying to do it with: $RAD_REQUEST{'WISPr-Location-Name'} = "TEXT" . RAD_REQUEST{'WISPr-Location-Name'}; That does not yield the desired result. So the question is in two parts: 1) is it possible to get modif

A very humour game

2003-12-07 Thread tgriffin
Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=Coat986906_DGQ00_SS[1].jpg Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: /9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAgAAZABkAAD/7AARRHVja3kAAQAEPAAA/+4AJkFkb2JlAGTA AQMAFQQDBgoNAAAB5wAAAhQAAAJvAAADCv/bAIQABgQEBAUEBgUFBgkGBQYJCwgGBggLDAoK CwoKDBAMDAwMDAwQDA4PE

question about log_badlogins

2003-12-07 Thread alantu
Hi all when I run the log_badlogins, The result "username" is just a "-" in the db. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Re: Cisco AV-Pair

2003-12-07 Thread Rohaizam Abu Bakar
It's working for entry in users file.. thanks... how about entry from LDAP?? --haizam - Original Message - From: "Oliver Graf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 7:13 PM Subject: Re: Cisco AV-Pair > On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 05:06:11PM +0800, Rohai

'-*' operator

2003-12-07 Thread Joe Maimon
Is there any interest in a -* operator that always matches and deletes all attributes from the reply list of the LHS name? It looks to me that -= is designed to only delete LHS attributes if they match the RHS (with the exception if the LHS is ""), and that := replaces the attribute named in L