in the archive mailing-list... here is a copy:
Subject: XLAT patch
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 17:03:53 +0200
From: Christophe Boyanique [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[-- Attachement #1 --]
[-- Type : text/plain, Codage : 7bit, Taille : 1,0K --]
Hi,
I had problems while trying to work
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 05:07:18PM -0300, Jorge Minassian wrote:
Can some one let me know if freeradius has the same (or better ?)
features/perfomance than Radiator ?.
About performance it's better. Much better...
I made a benchmark some time ago with one radius server doing
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 09:01:56AM +0200, Mike Janssen wrote:
Subject: Mike Janssen/ZND/CSS is out of the office.
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 09:01:56 +0200
I hope this is some kind of April Fools Day joke. Doubled mailing-list
traffic during two weeks may drive someone insane...
--
Christophe.
-
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 11:48:25AM -0500, Alan DeKok wrote:
Try:
detailfile = /radacct/%{%{config:Acct-Type}:-NOREALM}_%Y%m%d.log
Acct-Type is a server configuration directive, and never goes into
the reply.
I made some new experiences and I found a way to do what I want. This is
the
But if I move Realm := csd.sfr on the first
line it doesn't work (ie %{reply:Realm} is empty).
Then use %{config:Realm}, as was mentioned in an earlier message.
When moved on the first line the directive Realm = 'csd.sfr' or
Realm := 'csd.sfr'; there is *nothing* in %{whatever:Realm}, I
Hello,
I would like to choose a detail filename from the acct_users file (based
on many parameters like Calling-Station-Id, NAS-IP-Address, ...) and use
that filename in the detail module. To be more precise: I want to have
only one detail instance, with a variable in the detailfile entry,
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 11:48:25AM -0500, Alan DeKok wrote:
DEFAULT Called-Station-Id==9100, Acct-Type:=csd.sfr
...
detailfile = /radacct/%{%{reply:Acct-Type}:-NOREALM}_%Y%m%d.log
Try:
detailfile = /radacct/%{%{config:Acct-Type}:-NOREALM}_%Y%m%d.log
Doesn't seem to work :(
I
Hello,
In the Changelog I just saw that:
Dictionaries are now in /usr/local/share/freeradius
But for what I saw in the sources (cvs snapshot from 20030324),
dictionnaries are installed in /usr/local/share/freeradius but read from
/etc/raddb which leads to an error and radiusd not starting.
I
Hello,
I'm wondering if anyone has the idea of the 0.9 release schedule ? I am
on a project and I would want to use 0.9pre features (like round robin
and Acct-Type): I don't know if I can wait for a release or if I should
go with a CVS version.
This is just to have an idea of timing: should it
You should have /etc/raddb/dictionary which includes
/usr/local/share/freeradius/dictionary. Check the raddb/dictionary
file from that snapshot to verify.
Ok my mistake: I deleted dictionnary files from /etc and copied the new
one in /usr/share/freeradius.
Next time I'll double check things
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 08:24:06AM -0500, Alan DeKok wrote:
I need to add a realm to all user without it.
Why?
I have the same need here: I received calls access-requests and
accounting requests without User-Name nor User-Pasword that I proxify to
a 'home' server. I want to have a
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 11:54:22AM -0500, freeradius mailing list wrote:
Now, what I want to do is make it change the realm that is added based on
an attribute that comes in. So maybe something like.
I have a solution but it is not very clean and i only tested it with
freeradius 0.8.1 so i'm
Hello,
I looked around in many docs but I cannot find anything to help me at
this point: I want to add a realm to users in function of a request
attribute (like Called-Station-ID).
I managed to route my requests to the proxy with something like that in
the users file:
DEFAULT
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Franklin Trumpy wrote:
Perhaps try specifying the explicit behavior of the group rather than
using redudant { } ?
From doc/configurable_failover:
I should have guessed to do that...
It is working, but is is strange that it isn't with redundant{}...
Christophe.
-
Hello,
I have the same problem the one explained here:
http://lists.cistron.nl/pipermail/freeradius-users/2002-September/011562.html
Basically, I set up two redundant sql instances (sql1 and sql2) for
accounting:
accounting {
acct_unique
redundant {
sql1
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Alan DeKok wrote:
I'm a little confused by your description. If you want one server
to log to *two* SQL databases, then you don't want redundancy.
I want to log to *one* SQL database and to have a backup database if the
first one doesn't work.
See
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Kevin Bonner wrote:
authorize {
preprocess
suffix
files
autztype tst{
ldap_tst
}
autztype com{
ldap_com
}
}
Move the files line below the Autz-Type's in your
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Simon White wrote:
Who is your registrar? I might recommend www.gandi.fr
I think you mean: http://www.gandi.net
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Hi all,
I'm looking for a way to have multiple sources of authentication with
round-robin. I would like to use two ldap servers to autenticate users
but I didn't find a way to do it.
I set 2 ldap sections in the top of the file and tried something like
that:
authorize {
append {
Back from my previous question; I found the Autz-Type doc file that
seems to explain a way to fit my needs.
I created an empty users file with only:
DEFAULT Called-Station-Id == 0, Autz-Type := tst, Auth-Type := tst
DEFAULT Called-Station-Id == 1, Autz-Type := com, Auth-Type := com
And I
20 matches
Mail list logo
