= t;
Vic Abell
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Alan DeKok writes:
Vic Abell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*last = t;
last = t-next
If t == NULL, won't t-next attempt to de-reference a
NULL pointer?
Yes, but I didn't show all of the code I commited.
Check the CVS version of files.c
Isn't last (currently) supposed
/development.html -- tells how to use cvs
to get the source.
The cvsweb.cgi is re-enabled as well.
I was able to get at the CVS web archive and look at files.c.
Alan DeKok's explanation of his change is clear now. It's a
much cleaner fix than the one I suggested.
Thanks everyone,
Vic Abell
Allister Maguire writes:
We do it for our ISP, we use rlm_ldap for authorisation and rlm_pam for
authentication (using Kerberos), works great. We have created our own
ldap schema attributes, but you can use the Microsoft ones. One thing,
because we use kerberos it also requires the use of
1813 and 1812 at the 0.5 distribution.
Vic Abell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
an entity is
authorized it should be asked to prove itself via
authentication.
Why does the Radius protocol reverse the order of
authentication and authorization?
Vic Abell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
ZARAZA writes:
Dear Vic Abell,
Imagine you're coming to your president's room
Secretary: do you have an appointment?
Mr. Abell: Yes, my name is Vic Abel
In this new an suspicious age, that wouldn't be the exchange.
It would be:
Secretary: Do you have an appointment?
Mr. Abell: Yes
Alan DeKok writes:
Vic Abell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think someone should be authorized before the claimed identity
has been authenticated. Otherwise authorization might be given to
someone falsely claiming an identity.
Nonsense. The authorization isn't returned
Alan DeKok writes:
Uh, right. Why were you arguing about something you didn't
understand? It would have been politer for you to ask HOW it works,
rather than claiming it's wrong and insecure, and then back-pedalling
when your confusion was corrected.
Well I don't think I ever said
