Re: 0.9.1 and bad logins

2003-10-24 Thread Michael Richardson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > "Bill" == Bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bill> I recently switched from Cistron to FreeRadius 0.9.1 I just Bill> noticed Bill> that FreeRadius is periodically rejecting customer's passwords when Bill> the It sounds like fre

Re: 0.9.1 and bad logins

2003-10-20 Thread Alan DeKok
"Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What does this mean? I don't understand the -s according to the radiusd > man page. When I do a "ps ax" and review my logs Radius appears to running > normally. It means that there are still threading issues with some system calls. FreeRADIUS has its ow

Re: 0.9.1 and bad logins

2003-10-17 Thread Bill
authentication request. With this flag the server will not do that. It won't even "daemonize" (auto-background) itself. Bill - Original Message - From: Alan DeKok To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 9:26 AM Subject: Re: 0.9.1 and b

Re: 0.9.1 and bad logins

2003-10-17 Thread Alan DeKok
"VCI Help Desk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I did more testing with this Perl script I wrote that uses radtest to > repeatedly test FreeRadius with a username and password file. If the > username is near to the top of the passwd file it has a much smaller chance > of an invalid login compared

Re: 0.9.1 and bad logins

2003-10-17 Thread VCI Help Desk
ssage - From: Alan DeKok To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 4:47 PM Subject: Re: 0.9.1 and bad logins "VCI Help Desk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there any debugging I can do to determine if it's rejecting the user > for some other reason

Re: 0.9.1 and bad logins

2003-10-16 Thread Alan DeKok
"VCI Help Desk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there any debugging I can do to determine if it's rejecting the user > for some other reason? I've turned on the auth_detail and radiusd -x and > that hasn't helped. Don't define the 'passwd', 'group', or 'shadow' entries in the 'unix' module c

Re: 0.9.1 and bad logins

2003-10-16 Thread VCI Help Desk
6, 2003 3:28 PM Subject: Re: 0.9.1 and bad logins "Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, the caching is turned off. We actually thought about turning it on > to see if that would have any affect on this problem. Then are you *sure* you're using the latest version of

Re: 0.9.1 and bad logins

2003-10-16 Thread Bill
en't found anything. I noticed there are some notes on the FreeRadius homepage from 19 September about the Pam module and RedHat 9. Problem is, we have the Pam stuff disabled in Radius. Bill - Original Message - From: Alan DeKok To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16,

Re: 0.9.1 and bad logins

2003-10-16 Thread Alan DeKok
"Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, the caching is turned off. We actually thought about turning it on > to see if that would have any affect on this problem. Then are you *sure* you're using the latest version of rlm_unix, and not an older one? There may be threading issues with older

Re: 0.9.1 and bad logins

2003-10-16 Thread Bill
No, the caching is turned off. We actually thought about turning it on to see if that would have any affect on this problem. Bill - Original Message - From: Alan DeKok To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 2:58 PM Subject: Re: 0.9.1 and bad logins &quo

Re: 0.9.1 and bad logins

2003-10-16 Thread Alan DeKok
"VCI Help Desk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In studying this I have written a brief Perl script that will run > radtest repeatedly. The script pauses for half a second between tests. > Sometimes the script will successfully authenticate the same > username/password 127 times and sometimes it w

Re: 0.9.1 and bad logins

2003-10-16 Thread VCI Help Desk
n I so a "ps ax"? I only see one and never see more than that. We are using MySQL for accounting logging and nothing else. Bill - Original Message - From: Alan DeKok To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 1:40 PM Subject: Re: 0.9.1 and bad logins

Re: 0.9.1 and bad logins

2003-10-16 Thread Alan DeKok
"Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sometimes FreeRadius will say the login was rejected due to an invalid > shell. Again, the shell is correct. When this happens it doesn't even parse > the passwd file entry correctly. It will say the login was rejected due to > an invalid shell and the shell

0.9.1 and bad logins

2003-10-16 Thread Bill
Hi, I recently switched from Cistron to FreeRadius 0.9.1 I just noticed that FreeRadius is periodically rejecting customer's passwords when the passwords are correct. Most customers simply re-type their password when their computer says the password was rejected but some don't know thei