Re: Configuring without libltdl

2002-11-12 Thread Alan DeKok
Dave Wreski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So you don't have libltdl but do have libtool installed? Huh? No. I don't have either installed. Okay, then that explains the whole problem. Those that already have libtool/libltdl installed wouldn't need another installed. Those that don't get

Re: Configuring without libltdl

2002-11-12 Thread Dave Wreski
Okay, then that explains the whole problem. Those that already have libtool/libltdl installed wouldn't need another installed. Those that don't get the one that's included with freeradius. There's no in-between... There is, IF you edit the 'Makefile's as I suggested. No, I explained the

Re: Configuring without libltdl

2002-11-11 Thread Alan DeKok
Dave Wreski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In order to generate libltdl.la, it's necessary for me to run make manually. It isn't built automatically for some reason. If you don't have libltdl installed, then a 'make' should build it. Even once it's built, there is nothing in that file that

Re: Configuring without libltdl

2002-11-11 Thread Alan DeKok
Dave Wreski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It looks like making only the following change builds radiusd successfully: make LIBLTDLPATH=$RPM_BUILD_DIR/freeradius-snapshot-20021108/libltdl \ LIBLTDL=$RPM_BUILD_DIR/freeradius-snapshot-20021108/libltdl/.libs/libltdl.a Alan, does this sound

Re: Configuring without libltdl

2002-11-11 Thread Dave Wreski
shrug It's libtool magic. All I know is that I don't have libltdl installed, so I just do: $ configure $ make $ make install and it works. So you don't have libltdl but do have libtool installed? libtool, and libltdl, are insane helpful tools from the GNU people. (Who are

Re: Configuring without libltdl

2002-11-11 Thread Alan DeKok
Dave Wreski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So you don't have libltdl but do have libtool installed? Huh? No. I don't have either installed. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Re: Configuring without libltdl

2002-11-09 Thread Alan DeKok
Dave Wreski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The only way I could prevent it from linking against the system libltdl is to move the system libtool and /usr/lib/liblt* to a directory not in the local path. Or, specify the local libltdl as an *object*, not a *library*. That's pretty much what I

Re: Configuring without libltdl

2002-11-09 Thread Dave Wreski
Or, specify the local libltdl as an *object*, not a *library*. That's pretty much what I said. The problem is that apparently without telling configure to not use the system ltdl, the local libltdl.a that you specified doesn't exist at the time radiusd is built. --enable-ltdl \

Re: Configuring without libltdl

2002-11-09 Thread Dave Wreski
There SHOULD be libltdl.la in ./libltdl. The libtool link line should run libtool, which finds that file, and roots through it to discover that the '.a' file is in './libs'. In order to generate libltdl.la, it's necessary for me to run make manually. It isn't built automatically for some

Re: Configuring without libltdl

2002-11-09 Thread Dave Wreski
In order to generate libltdl.la, it's necessary for me to run make manually. It isn't built automatically for some reason. It looks like making only the following change builds radiusd successfully: make LIBLTDLPATH=$RPM_BUILD_DIR/freeradius-snapshot-20021108/libltdl \

Re: Configuring without libltdl

2002-11-08 Thread Alan DeKok
Dave Wreski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems radiusd is still linked against the system libtool, but this is a development box, and the production box won't have libtool installed. Is this a bug or am I doing something wrong? It's most likely a local linker problem. If the compile

Re: Configuring without libltdl

2002-11-08 Thread Dave Wreski
Alan, It seems radiusd is still linked against the system libtool, but this is a development box, and the production box won't have libtool installed. Is this a bug or am I doing something wrong? It's most likely a local linker problem. If the compile command has '-lltdl', then it's