From: Nicolas Baradakis
Sent: Thursday, 11 September 2003 8:30 PM
I'm an idiot. My script didn't grep the GPL header and I thought oh
there's a typo in the first line. But as you noticed the following
lines are broken too.
I've corrected this and made (once again) a new patch.
Thankyou,
From: Nicolas Baradakis
Sent: Tuesday, 9 September 2003 1:33 AM
Alan DeKok wrote:
As FreeRADIUS is developed under the GNU General Public License, all
the contributions fall under the GPL too. Therefore I was thinking it
would be better to make it explicit in all files in the source
Paul Hampson wrote:
The following files already had a GPL header but it was incomplete or
contained a typo:
src/modules/rlm_acct_unique/rlm_acct_unique.c
src/modules/rlm_always/rlm_always.c
src/modules/rlm_attr_filter/rlm_attr_filter.c
src/modules/rlm_dbm/rlm_dbm.c
Paul Hampson wrote:
The following file had no licence, so I inserted a GPL header:
src/lib/crypt.c
src/lib/dict.c
src/lib/hmac.c
src/lib/log.c
src/lib/misc.c
src/lib/missing.c
src/lib/print.c
src/lib/radius.c
src/lib/snprintf.c
src/lib/token.c
Paul Hampson wrote:
I am not a lawyer, but I play one on TV...
[...]
You should look at src/lib/snprintf.c too. There is no licence in the
header but it comes from mutt source code which is GPL...
--
Nicolas Baradakis
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
From: Nicolas Baradakis
Sent: Thursday, 11 September 2003 1:21 AM
$ cvs diff -u src/modules/rlm_acct_unique/rlm_acct_unique.c
src/modules/rlm_always/rlm_always.c
src/modules/rlm_attr_filter/rlm_attr_filter.c src/modules/rlm_dbm/rlm_dbm.c
src/modules/rlm_dbm/rlm_dbm_cat.c
From: Nicolas Baradakis
Sent: Thursday, 11 September 2003 1:39 AM
Paul Hampson wrote:
src/modules/rlm_ldap/rlm_ldap.c
src/modules/rlm_mschap/smbencrypt.c
src/modules/rlm_passwd/rlm_passwd.c
src/modules/rlm_smb/valid.c
src/modules/rlm_sql/drivers/rlm_sql_iodbc/sql_iodbc.c
Alan DeKok wrote:
As FreeRADIUS is developed under the GNU General Public License, all
the contributions fall under the GPL too. Therefore I was thinking it
would be better to make it explicit in all files in the source tree.
Or is it ok to leave it like that ? I don't really know.
As I was reading pieces of the freeradius source code, I noticed some
files don't include a GPL header with the usual text This program is
free software...
As FreeRADIUS is developed under the GNU General Public License, all
the contributions fall under the GPL too. Therefore I was thinking it
Nicolas Baradakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As FreeRADIUS is developed under the GNU General Public License, all
the contributions fall under the GPL too. Therefore I was thinking it
would be better to make it explicit in all files in the source tree.
Or is it ok to leave it like that ? I don't
10 matches
Mail list logo
