> From: Nicolas Baradakis
> Sent: Thursday, 11 September 2003 8:30 PM
> I'm an idiot. My script didn't grep the GPL header and I thought "oh
> there's a typo in the first line". But as you noticed the following
> lines are broken too.
> I've corrected this and made (once again) a new patch.
Than
Paul Hampson wrote:
[...]
> > /*
> > * rlm_acct_unique.c
> > *
> > - * This program is is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> > * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License, version
> From: Nicolas Baradakis
> Sent: Thursday, 11 September 2003 1:39 AM
> Paul Hampson wrote:
> > > src/modules/rlm_ldap/rlm_ldap.c
> > > src/modules/rlm_mschap/smbencrypt.c
> > > src/modules/rlm_passwd/rlm_passwd.c
> > > src/modules/rlm_smb/valid.c
> > > src/modules/rlm_sql/drivers/rlm_sql_io
> From: Nicolas Baradakis
> Sent: Thursday, 11 September 2003 1:21 AM
> $ cvs diff -u src/modules/rlm_acct_unique/rlm_acct_unique.c
> src/modules/rlm_always/rlm_always.c
> src/modules/rlm_attr_filter/rlm_attr_filter.c src/modules/rlm_dbm/rlm_dbm.c
> src/modules/rlm_dbm/rlm_dbm_cat.c
> src/mod
Paul Hampson wrote:
> I am not a lawyer, but I play one on TV...
[...]
You should look at src/lib/snprintf.c too. There is no licence in the
header but it comes from mutt source code which is GPL...
--
Nicolas Baradakis
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/us
Paul Hampson wrote:
> > The following file had no licence, so I inserted a GPL header:
> > src/lib/crypt.c
> > src/lib/dict.c
> > src/lib/hmac.c
> > src/lib/log.c
> > src/lib/misc.c
> > src/lib/missing.c
> > src/lib/print.c
> > src/lib/radius.c
> > src/lib/snprintf.c
> > src/lib/token.c
Paul Hampson wrote:
> > The following files already had a GPL header but it was incomplete or
> > contained a typo:
> > src/modules/rlm_acct_unique/rlm_acct_unique.c
> > src/modules/rlm_always/rlm_always.c
> > src/modules/rlm_attr_filter/rlm_attr_filter.c
> > src/modules/rlm_dbm/rlm_dbm.c
> >
> From: Nicolas Baradakis
> Sent: Tuesday, 9 September 2003 1:33 AM
> Alan DeKok wrote:
> > > As FreeRADIUS is developed under the GNU General Public License, all
> > > the contributions fall under the GPL too. Therefore I was thinking it
> > > would be better to make it explicit in all files in
Alan DeKok wrote:
> > As FreeRADIUS is developed under the GNU General Public License, all
> > the contributions fall under the GPL too. Therefore I was thinking it
> > would be better to make it explicit in all files in the source tree.
> > Or is it ok to leave it like that ? I don't really know.
Nicolas Baradakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As FreeRADIUS is developed under the GNU General Public License, all
> the contributions fall under the GPL too. Therefore I was thinking it
> would be better to make it explicit in all files in the source tree.
> Or is it ok to leave it like that ? I
10 matches
Mail list logo
