Re: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version

2003-09-01 Thread Mohsen Chirara
:172.16.4.198 active:1 cli:0 num:1 What next ? Mohsen - Original Message - From: Mohsen Chirara [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 5:05 PM Subject: Re: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version Ok I installed rlm_ippool from cvs branch - I will let you know

Re: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version

2003-09-01 Thread Kostas Kalevras
: RE: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version Hi Paul, I can install a recent (cvs) version, but I'd like to know how to check This is gonna take some time. I installed rlm_ippool only from cvs (the rest is still 0.9.0 release), but by server is crashing with it. I'll let you know

Re: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version

2003-09-01 Thread Mohsen Chirara
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 9:30 AM Subject: Re: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Mohsen Chirara wrote: After 3 days of testing, I am still having the same problem. Now out of the entire class C, I aways have the same 7 IP addresses available

RE: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version

2003-09-01 Thread Chris van Meerendonk
Well, it seems I've got it up and running now. I'm running today's cvs-snapshot. Because I'm testing it on a MaxTNT I also got the Ascend-hack set in the config. The results so far aren't very good, I'm ip's aren't freed after calls are closed. In the radacct logging the start and stop records

RE: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version

2003-09-01 Thread Paul Hampson
From: Mohsen Chirara Sent: Monday, 1 September 2003 7:08 PM After 3 days of testing, I am still having the same problem. Now out of the entire class C, I aways have the same 7 IP addresses available for the pool. Here's is IP Tool output: NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x36 - ipaddr:172.16.4.147 active:1

Re: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version

2003-09-01 Thread Mohsen Chirara
See below my answers: After 3 days of testing, I am still having the same problem. Now out of the entire class C, I aways have the same 7 IP addresses available for the pool. Here's is IP Tool output: NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x36 - ipaddr:172.16.4.147 active:1 cli:0 num:1 NAS:w.x.y.z

Re: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version

2003-09-01 Thread Kostas Kalevras
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Mohsen Chirara wrote: After 3 days of testing, I am still having the same problem. Now out of the entire class C, I aways have the same 7 IP addresses available for the pool. Here's is IP Tool output: NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x36 - ipaddr:172.16.4.147 active:1 cli:0 num:1

RE: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version

2003-08-28 Thread Chris van Meerendonk
Hi Paul, I can install a recent (cvs) version, but I'd like to know how to check This is gonna take some time. I installed rlm_ippool only from cvs (the rest is still 0.9.0 release), but by server is crashing with it. I'll let you know when I have something interesting. Chris - List

Re: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version

2003-08-28 Thread Mohsen Chirara
Ok I installed rlm_ippool from cvs branch - I will let you know if everything is OK within 2 days. - Original Message - From: Chris van Meerendonk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 1:20 PM Subject: RE: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version Hi Paul

Re: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version

2003-08-27 Thread Chris van Meerendonk
Hi Paul, I can install a recent (cvs) version, but I'd like to know how to check which ip-addresses are assigned according to the radius-server. On the NAS I can check that, just need to know how to compare these. Radius keeps these things in memory, doesn't it? Are there tools for tracking this?

RE: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version

2003-08-27 Thread Paul Hampson
From: Chris van Meerendonk Sent: Wednesday, 27 August 2003 7:12 PM I can install a recent (cvs) version, but I'd like to know how to check which ip-addresses are assigned according to the radius-server. On the NAS I can check that, just need to know how to compare these. Radius keeps these

RE: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version

2003-08-27 Thread Chris van Meerendonk
Wauw, that's fun! I'll try if I can find any bugs... Thanks, Chris On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 14:31, Paul Hampson wrote: From: Chris van Meerendonk Sent: Wednesday, 27 August 2003 7:12 PM I can install a recent (cvs) version, but I'd like to know how to check which ip-addresses are