On Sun, 16 Nov 2003, Rohaizam Abu Bakar wrote:
When runing ldapsearch did you bind with the problematic DNs or with the
admin
DN? I would suggest trying to bind with the user DNs and see what happens
I bind as admin DN but why i never received the error while running in
FreeBSD 4.8..
: Status...
Rohaizam Abu Bakar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hopefully in 1.0 release, rlm_ldap can work well with FreeBSD 5.1
Currently it has problem.. so i stick with FreeBSD 4.8 (and 4.9)
Are you willing to tell us what those problems are?
Alan DeKok
any comments in below problem...??
--haizam
- Original Message -
From: Rohaizam Abu Bakar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 8:59 AM
Subject: Re: Status... rlm_ldap problem
I've sent all the error log/debug output before .. but Kostas ask me
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Rohaizam Abu Bakar wrote:
any comments in below problem...??
--haizam
- Original Message -
From: Rohaizam Abu Bakar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 8:59 AM
Subject: Re: Status... rlm_ldap problem
I've sent all
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 09:47, Alan DeKok wrote:
Rohaizam Abu Bakar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hopefully in 1.0 release, rlm_ldap can work...
as an aside, i'm emailed the list twice regarding rlm_sql's apparent
inability to work with huntgroups. i'm willing to do the work myself to
add the
At 09:31 AM 11/13/2003, Jeff Murphy wrote:
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 09:47, Alan DeKok wrote:
Rohaizam Abu Bakar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hopefully in 1.0 release, rlm_ldap can work...
as an aside, i'm emailed the list twice regarding rlm_sql's apparent
inability to work with huntgroups. i'm
At 10:26 AM 11/13/2003, Chris Parker wrote:
At 09:31 AM 11/13/2003, Jeff Murphy wrote:
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 09:47, Alan DeKok wrote:
Rohaizam Abu Bakar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hopefully in 1.0 release, rlm_ldap can work...
as an aside, i'm emailed the list twice regarding rlm_sql's apparent
Hi,
That's what I thought, but the Freeradius web site says this: It
currently only supports Microsoft's MS-CHAPv2 version of tunneled EAP
authentication, so Cisco clients will most likely not work.
Dave
Alan DeKok wrote:
Here's another question, while I'm here. I believe the current PEAP
ave Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's what I thought, but the Freeradius web site says this: It
currently only supports Microsoft's MS-CHAPv2 version of tunneled EAP
authentication, so Cisco clients will most likely not work.
Mostly because 90% of PEAP clients do only MS-CHAPv2. The
...
--haizam
- Original Message -
From: Alan DeKok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 10:47 PM
Subject: Re: Status...
Rohaizam Abu Bakar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hopefully in 1.0 release, rlm_ldap can work well with FreeBSD 5.1
Currently it has problem
I hope that perl module will be updated to the latest changes i did post to
the list.
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 01:11:13PM -0500, Alan DeKok wrote:
I'll be in Minneapolis all next week at a conference. My usual
5 minute response time will increase dramatically.
As for other issues,
Rohaizam Abu Bakar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hopefully in 1.0 release, rlm_ldap can work well with FreeBSD 5.1
Currently it has problem.. so i stick with FreeBSD 4.8 (and 4.9)
Are you willing to tell us what those problems are?
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
Hi Alan,
There were some old problems from 0.8.1 which I'm not sure got fixed.
In particular, the one I remember is the problem with static links in
modules that have submodules. Will that fix be in 0.9.3 or 1.0.0? (I
remember another one with EAP mudules not returning RLM_* return codes
Dave Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There were some old problems from 0.8.1 which I'm not sure got fixed.
In particular, the one I remember is the problem with static links in
modules that have submodules. Will that fix be in 0.9.3 or 1.0.0?
It should be fixed before 1.0. I don't
Subject: Status...
I'll be in Minneapolis all next week at a conference. My usual
5 minute response time will increase dramatically.
As for other issues, there are fixes which could go into 0.9.3. The
CVS head still has some issues (u_int... should be uint), and linking
problems.
I
Does anybody know if there are any replacement diallers or TCP/IP stacks
for windows that actually report back the error code output by freeradius
when a connection is denied. We've got a few customers that are becoming an
increasing hassle support-wise, who we could easily silence if there was a
All,
I'd like to extend the 'Status Server' Reply Message with the admins contact
information
Does anybody has an advice or a readme?
My environment:
SuSe 8.1, FreeRADIUS 0.8.1
Test with NTRadPing
Thanks
Stefan
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list
Stefan Auweiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to extend the 'Status Server' Reply Message with the admins =
contact
information
Does anybody has an advice or a readme?
Source code modifications. See 'src/main/radiusd.c'
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Benjamin Smith wrote:
Using openLDAP/Freeradius 0.8.1 (should say, setting it up).
What's the easiest way to determine if anybody is online right now?
Optimum would be a Web-thingy with little red/green lights, but that may be
asking a bit much!
Dialup_admin
Using openLDAP/Freeradius 0.8.1 (should say, setting it up).
What's the easiest way to determine if anybody is online right now?
Optimum would be a Web-thingy with little red/green lights, but that may be
asking a bit much!
Searching freshmeat, google and the freeradius website turned up
Benjamin Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the easiest way to determine if anybody is online right now?
radwho?
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Thanks.
-Ben
On Thursday 27 February 2003 07:50 am, Alan DeKok wrote:
Benjamin Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the easiest way to determine if anybody is online right now?
radwho?
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Router
Cards:
rad_recv: Status-Server packet from host 216.176.146.2:1645, id=252, length=20
Ignoring request from client 216.176.146.2:1645 with unknown code 12
Which then the accounting data shows UserName unauthenticated attempting to
authenticate which I believe is some sort of generic 3Com
. However, after several hours of
perfect operation, all of our freeradius servers now receive the
following from our Access Router Cards:
rad_recv: Status-Server packet from host 216.176.146.2:1645, id=252,
length=20 Ignoring request from client 216.176.146.2:1645 with
unknown code 12
Thanks for the reply Alan.
I'm not *opposed* to adding Status-Server support to FreeRADIUS, but
I am opposed to adding functionality unless there's a real need for it.
Is there a straight forward way that I can add Status-Server support into
FreeRadius 0.7.1 to see if it will correct
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Alan DeKok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FreeRADIUS doesn't do Status-Server messages. I've never seen a
good reason for them.
Some clients use periodic status-server pinging to see if the
server is up.
That is useful with a server that has both local users
query
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hallo all
Need to ask a Mysql auth question
I added another field to my radcheck table 'status'
mysql desc radcheck
- ;
+---+-+--+-+--++
| Field | Type| Null | Key | Default | Extra
. Mail Delivery Status Notification (Postmaster)
2. Re: suggestions about attributes (Kostas Kalevras)
--__--__--
Message: 1
From: Postmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail Delivery Status Notification
boundary=_=_NextPart_1
Date: 5 Sep 2002 08:12:51 -0700
Reply
. Mail Delivery Status Notification (Postmaster)
--__--__--
Message: 1
From: Postmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail Delivery Status Notification
boundary=_=_NextPart_1
Date: 5 Sep 2002 08:42:51 -0700
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---End Message---
MAIL ESSENTIALS SENDER
. Mail Delivery Status Notification (Postmaster)
--__--__--
Message: 1
From: Postmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail Delivery Status Notification
boundary=_=_NextPart_1
Date: 5 Sep 2002 08:44:42 -0700
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---End Message---
MAIL ESSENTIALS SENDER
. Mail Delivery Status Notification (Postmaster)
--__--__--
Message: 1
From: Postmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail Delivery Status Notification
boundary=_=_NextPart_1
Date: 5 Sep 2002 08:46:48 -0700
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---End Message---
MAIL ESSENTIALS SENDER
. Mail Delivery Status Notification (Postmaster)
--__--__--
Message: 1
From: Postmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail Delivery Status Notification
boundary=_=_NextPart_1
Date: 5 Sep 2002 08:48:54 -0700
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---End Message---
MAIL ESSENTIALS SENDER
. Cannot find a Domain attribute ?? (Deramus, Chris)
2. Mail Delivery Status Notification (Postmaster)
--__--__--
Message: 1
From: Deramus, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cannot find a Domain attribute ??
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 11:50:26 -0400
boundary
. Mail Delivery Status Notification (Postmaster)
--__--__--
Message: 1
From: Postmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail Delivery Status Notification
boundary=_=_NextPart_1
Date: 5 Sep 2002 08:53:48 -0700
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---End Message---
MAIL ESSENTIALS SENDER
. Mail Delivery Status Notification (Postmaster)
--__--__--
Message: 1
From: Postmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail Delivery Status Notification
boundary=_=_NextPart_1
Date: 5 Sep 2002 08:56:15 -0700
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---End Message---
MAIL ESSENTIALS SENDER
[cc listmaster]
On Thu, 2002-09-05 at 11:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From: Postmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail Delivery Status Notification
boundary=_=_NextPart_1
Date: 5 Sep 2002 08:48:54 -0700
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MAIL ESSENTIALS SENDER
Hi,
Does anybody know how the Status-Server RADIUStype
is used?
Is it used as a "keepalive"for the RADIUSserver?
In addition, is there documentation on what the contents
of the
RADIUSPDUshould be sent by the RADIUSclient
and what
should be received from the RADIUSserver?
...Gil
Gil Yu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See: http://www.freeradius.org/rfc/attributes.html
Does anybody know how the Status-Server RADIUS type is used?
http://www.freeradius.org/rfc/rfc2865.html
Section 3.
Is it used as a keepalive for the RADIUS server?
No.
http
Hi Alan,
THanks for your response, but there is no information on the
Status-Server. What
I would like is something to indicate what the status
of the server is (from the
RADIUSclient perspective).
Any suggestions?
..Gil
Alan DeKok wrote:
Gil Yu" [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
S
Gil Yu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
THanks for your response, but there is no information on the
Status-Server.
Exactly. Its use is implementation-dependent.
What I would like is something to indicate what the status of the
server is (from the RADIUS client perspective).
See the link I
way
but we are looking for a
way to check the status of the Server from the Client
perspective though
SNMPshould be used instead. It is a requirement
that is coming from
our customer.
That is why. One potential solution is to alternatively
trying
the two servers, but there is a cost associated
.
That's about the only reason I can think of for using
Status-Server.
I agree that that a ping is not the best way but we are looking for a
way to check the status of the Server from the Client perspective though
SNMP should be used instead. It is a requirement that is coming from
M Z Rahman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was trying to run an external perl script to do some customised logging
depending on the Acct-Status-Type in the users file:
That won't work. 'users' is for authorization/authentication.
Look at 'acct_users'
Now, my question is does free-radius
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 01:11:54PM +0800, M Z Rahman wrote:
I was trying to run an external perl script to do some customised logging
depending on the Acct-Status-Type in the users file:
DEFAULT Acct-Status-Type == Start
Exec-Program-Wait = /radius/raddb/startstopacct %u %s %e %f %n
Hi Guys,
I was trying to run an external perl script to do some customised logging
depending on the Acct-Status-Type in the users file:
DEFAULT Acct-Status-Type == Start
Exec-Program-Wait = /radius/raddb/startstopacct %u %s %e %f %n %c %i
%o %d %t %r %h
DEFAULT Acct-Status-Type
Carlos Velasco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a problem with 3Com TotalControl 1000 and NMC accounting.
It seems that the NMC send a code 12d packet (Status-Server request) as=
seen in the RFC, but the FreeRadius is not replying to this packet.
It doesn't have to reply. That packet
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Carlos Velasco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mike,
No, the problem is that the Radius Server (Freeradius) does not support
code 12d Requests.
I know. So I made the remark that adding support for it is easy,
and I demonstrated that Cistron Radius already has the code
47 matches
Mail list logo
