Hi all,Found a problem on freeradius when I review the log file (detail-MMDD).The following is my proxy settings.default (proxy to
1.1.1.1)abc.com (proxy to 2.2.2.2)But I found some error entries in detail log.The username is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and it's realm must be "abc.com"But in detail log
Another update
I've measured the time required by a single function under light load
(5-7req/sec) - on average it takes ~ 0.01 to 0.015 to process
authorize, pre-acct and less then half of that for pre/post proxy.
Under heavier load the boxes still spiral out of control (but only
after some time)
Hi All,
I am currently configuring
power distribution units(PDU) in our organisation, authentication from
freeradius-1.0.1-3.RHEL4.3
1. I have configured the
dictionary file accordingly.
client 131.xxx.xx.xxx {
secret =abcdeffghijk
shortname
On 10/30/06, duckeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/27/06, Jonathan De Graeve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Has anyone experimented with using Active Directory as a database for
> > > > Static IP Addressing?
> > > Yes, just assign a static ip in the AD dial-in properties for that user
> On 10/27/06, Jonathan De Graeve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Has anyone experimented with using Active Directory as a database for
> > > Static IP Addressing?
> > Yes, just assign a static ip in the AD dial-in properties for that user and
adapt the ldap.attrmap accordingly, this works perfe
On 10/30/06, duckeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/27/06, Jonathan De Graeve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Has anyone experimented with using Active Directory as a database for
> > Static IP Addressing?
> Yes, just assign a static ip in the AD dial-in properties for that user and
adapt the ld
On 10/27/06, Jonathan De Graeve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone experimented with using Active Directory as a database for
> Static IP Addressing?
Yes, just assign a static ip in the AD dial-in properties for that user and
adapt the ldap.attrmap accordingly, this works perfectly. There i
"open source" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The radius is checking only against the first check item, it's not checking
> the second one.
You can put two entries into Login-Time, by separaring them with commas.
Alan DeKok.
--
http://deployingradius.com - The web site of the book
http
"Pshem Kowalczyk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have one more question, though, - assuming that almost every single
> packet request requires some perl intervention - what should be the
> ratio of freeradius threads to rlm_perl threads (at least which number
> should be higher, or should they be e
"Ali Majdzadeh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (As suggested by the template itself)
>
> * *reply = pairmake ("User-Name", "root", T_OP_EQ);
> pairadd (&request->reply->vps, reply);
> request->reply->code = PW_USER_NAME;
No, that last line is wrong. Completely and totally wrong. No
template or
Hi allIs it possible to send Vendor Specific Attributes through an rlm module?I use the following method to send standard attributes through an rlm module:(As suggested by the template itself)
reply = pairmake ("User-Name", "root", T_OP_EQ);pairadd (&request->reply->vps, reply);request->reply->code
11 matches
Mail list logo
