[EMAIL PROTECTED] raddb]# radtest lim lim localhost 1645 testing123
Sending Access-Request of id 194 to 127.0.0.1 port 1812
User-Name = "lim"
User-Password = "lim"
NAS-IP-Address = 255.255.255.255
NAS-Port = 1645
rad_recv: Access-Reject packet from host 127.0.0.1:181
Hi,
Thanks for your answer.
Actually, I need a more "dynamic" solution. I will have an agreement with a
hotspot agregator (like Boingo...) and I will have about 60 millions NAS.
The thing is that each NAS have different rates(10 to 20 cent/mn).
So, for each user, I have to calculate the remaining
hi,
if the configure stage is giving you WARNINGs regarding
the options you want/need to use, then that suggests
that you dont have the packages you need to have installed.
this is a 'development'/'compilation' issue - which means
that you need to have the include headers, libraries
etc of the pa
Peter Nixon wrote:
> I agree that MySQL should change also, but at the time I go pushback for
> making backwards incompatible schema changes which some third party billing
> systems seem to rely on. I think the 2.0 release is the correct time to
> standardise all of this though..
Yes, please.
Fred Zinsli wrote:
...
> and I have the following errors
>
> make[6]: *** [rlm_sqlippool.lo] Error 1
You've deleted every possible *useful* error message.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
I have just discovered that if I just proceed and do a "sudo make
install" it obviously fails. But I then go back and do a "make" and it
has no errors, then I do the "sudo make install" again and it works.
Have I still done something wrong and can I trust the install?
Regards
Fred
> Hi ever
Hi everyone
Doing a brand new install in Ubuntu Draper 6.06 LAMP server.
I have downloaded freeradius 1.1.7 and place in in my home
directory /home/fredz
I have unpacked the file
tar -zxvf freeradius-1.1.7.tar.gz
Configured it
cd /home/fredz/freeradius-1.1.7
./configure
Have gone to make it
Pretty Woman wrote
> I doesnt work ("rlm_sql (sql): Could not link
> driver..")
See the FAQ for "it doesn't work".
> So I tried to reconfigure an see why but I dont
> understand why I get those warnings on ./compile
> I installed the iodbc rpm and I still get that
> "'iodbc' disabled" warning..
Hello,
I want to make freetradius work woth a MS-SQL database
now(on RedHat 9.0) and I installed : unixODBC,
FreeTDS, freeradius-1.1.7(with this options
"./configure --localstatedir=/var --sysconfdir=/etc")
I doesnt work ("rlm_sql (sql): Could not link
driver..")
So I tried to reconfigure an se
On Sep 2, 2007, at 08:52, George Beitis wrote:
Do
you know of any products that can be used with freeradius to provide
such authorization facilities? Using perhaps policies?
I have a number of authorization policies implemented using
FreeRadius. I have a module that implements those poli
George Beitis wrote:
>>> FreeRADIUS *does* implement policies which provide authorization
>>> facilities.
>
> Does this mean that you could actually write policies inside of freeradius?
Not "could", but "can". People do it all of the time. Best estimates
are nearing 100K installations, and
Alan DeKok wrote:
George Beitis wrote:
thank you for your reply. I am writing up a part of my dissertation and
I 'm referring to freeradius and the RADIUS protocol trying to explain
how it works.
By accident, mostly. Like many practical systems, it was built to do
something first,
Hey Alan
>> FreeRADIUS *does* implement policies which provide authorization facilities.
Does this mean that you could actually write policies inside of freeradius?
regards
George
Alan DeKok wrote:
> George Beitis wrote:
>
>> thank you for your reply. I am writing up a part of my dissertat
George Beitis wrote:
> thank you for your reply. I am writing up a part of my dissertation and
> I 'm referring to freeradius and the RADIUS protocol trying to explain
> how it works.
By accident, mostly. Like many practical systems, it was built to do
something first, and to have theoretical
Hey there
thanks for the reply, do you know how they do it though? Is it just
perl scripts that help make a decision? Or do they use authorization
engines of some sort that support policies?
George
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>> in other words authentication and authorization become
Hi,
> in other words authentication and authorization become one the same. Do
> you know of any products that can be used with freeradius to provide
> such authorization facilities? Using perhaps policies?
a LOT of people on this list use policies with authorization. be
that a trivial one such
Hey Alan,
thank you for your reply. I am writing up a part of my dissertation and
I 'm referring to freeradius and the RADIUS protocol trying to explain
how it works. From my research most people who use RADIUS for
authentication purposes. Noone gives a clear image of whether or not
they use it
George Beitis wrote:
> I have a general question regarding Authorization in the RADIUS protocol
> and how it is implemented in freeradius. What does the RADIUS protocol
> refer to when it talks about Authorization, does it actually refer to
> users being probably authorized after being authenticat
Hi everyone,
I have a general question regarding Authorization in the RADIUS protocol
and how it is implemented in freeradius. What does the RADIUS protocol
refer to when it talks about Authorization, does it actually refer to
users being probably authorized after being authenticated, using the
pr
19 matches
Mail list logo
