Alan wrote:
hi,
as Alan stated - your NAS doesnt seem to be getting
the responses from your server. some ACL or routing issue?
(stick a sniffer directly in front of the switch...if
you need to, you may need to have a 'port mirror' or somesuch
from the switch that feeds that switch if traffic
I don't understand, what is your goal?
Sergio Yébenes Moreno wrote:
Using eap-tls we can make a filter to users, based on different
attibutes (I think). In my case, the identity field in
wpa_supplicant.conf.
Freeradius config:
file users contains this
.
.
$INCLUDE autorizados
/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
__ Información de NOD32, revisión 3257 (20080710) __
Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system
http://www.nod32.com
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
NOD32, revisión 3257 (20080710) __
Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system
http://www.nod32.com
To use eap-tls with client certs signed by a public CA. Public CA means
that I can't do anything with this. But I don't want that everybody
comes to my network. I know
://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
__ Información de NOD32, revisión 3257 (20080710) __
Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system
http://www.nod32.com
To use eap-tls with client certs signed
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
__ Información de NOD32, revisión 3257 (20080710) __
Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system
http://www.nod32.com
To use eap-tls
hi folk,
we have a little network with some cable modems. all modems use
freeradius for authenticating and all useres use a pppoe session against
freeradius to connect with the router. this works. now we want a
bandwidth limitation for each modem.
is this possible with freeradius? or how can
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
__ Información de NOD32, revisión 3257 (20080710) __
Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system
http://www.nod32.com
To use eap-tls
/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
__ Información de NOD32, revisión 3257 (20080710) __
Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system
http
http://wiki.freeradius.org/Vendor-Specific_Attributes
Ivan Kalik
Kalik Informatika ISP
Dana 10/7/2008, mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] piše:
hi folk,
we have a little network with some cable modems. all modems use
freeradius for authenticating and all useres use a pppoe session against
freeradius to
mike wrote:
we have a little network with some cable modems. all modems use
freeradius for authenticating and all useres use a pppoe session against
freeradius to connect with the router. this works. now we want a
bandwidth limitation for each modem.
is this possible with freeradius? or how
Ok. DNIe gives PUBLIC access control, to a public network (university,
madrid Wifi (jeje, gallardón va de rey alcalde) etc), Dinamic keys, and
all in 802.1x and, in consequence, 802.11i. But probably we don't want
everybody in this network.Surely we hadn't spend money and time issuing
this.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
__ Información de NOD32, revisión 3257 (20080710) __
Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus
Sergio Yébenes Moreno wrote:
I don't want to use passwords.
Then why did the configurations you posted use passwords?
Now I want to put 3 virtual server, one for DNIe and one for another
public CA (FNMT) that have less range than DNIe. I'd like to ask you, if
you know. authorize section
first, freeradius looks in users file, and only if client is authorized,
checks DNIe. There aren't any problem, only want to show, maybe help
somebody, and to show Ivan Kalik how clients and servers can trust in
different ca's.
Oh, but I know exactly what you have done. You have created a
://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
__ Información de NOD32, revisión 3257 (20080710) __
Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system
http://www.nod32.com
I don't want to use passwords. Only want to use what at this time is
working: public domain eap-tls
. If it was supported, it would have been
documented.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
__ Información de NOD32, revisión 3257 (20080710) __
Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system
http://www.nod32
://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
__ Información de NOD32, revisión 3257 (20080710) __
Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system
http://www.nod32.com
Oh, I'll try this. Really empty password is shit. Thanks
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http
Sergio Yébenes Moreno wrote:
Oh, I'll try this. Really empty password is shit. Thanks
I think it's time for you to be polite.
Cursing at people who are trying to help you is inappropriate.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Sergio Yébenes Moreno wrote:
If I don't put Cleartext-Password := field (!!!), the user always
be rejected. Can anybody to explain this?
Read the debug output as suggested in the FAQ, README, INSTALL, and
daily on this list.
It's not hard.
Alan DeKok.
-
List
/unsubscribe? See
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
__ Información de NOD32, revisión 3257 (20080710) __
Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system
http://www.nod32.com
I don't want to use passwords. Only want to use what at this time is
working: public
://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
__ Información de NOD32, revisión 3257 (20080710) __
Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system
http://www.nod32.com
Sorry if I offend anybody. I don't bring bad intentions and my
vocabulary is little, I have a word translation web
Does anyone have some hacks to enable a clean compile on Mac OS X? When I
try to run make, I get the following compile errors:
cc -Wall -fPIC -c pam_radius_auth.c -o pam_radius_auth.o
pam_radius_auth.c: In function ‘get_random_vector’:
pam_radius_auth.c:358: error: storage size of ‘tz’ isn’t
Am 10.07.2008 um 18:28 schrieb Paul Goodman:
Does anyone have some hacks to enable a clean compile on Mac OS X?
When I try to run make, I get the following compile errors:
cc -Wall -fPIC -c pam_radius_auth.c -o pam_radius_auth.o
pam_radius_auth.c: In function ‘get_random_vector’:
How does the GPL apply to the freeradius plugins? I want to create a
freeradius plugin (completely my code), but does the GPL apply to it?
I ask because dynamic linking is a very gray area in the GPL field.
Thanks for your answer,
Steven
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
/unsubscribe? See
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
__ Información de NOD32, revisión 3257 (20080710) __
Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system
http://www.nod32.com
I don't want to use passwords. Only want to use what at this time is
working: public
If I don't put Cleartext-Password := field (!!!), the user always be
rejected. Can anybody to explain this?I haven't tried with some
password, because results me ridiculous, I haven't configure any password for
clients...
Let's put that to the test. Put the username that you
__ Información de NOD32, revisión 3257 (20080710) __
Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system
http://www.nod32.com
The situation that you exposed logically works. But I can't authorize
all users in spite of having a valid certificate, because the public
PKI.
Then, users
The situation that you exposed logically works. But I can't authorize
all users in spite of having a valid certificate, because the public
PKI.
.. what? You can authenticate some users (which) - what's the problem
with the others?
Then, users file:
...
user1
.
user2
.
Ivan Kalik escribió:
The situation that you exposed logically works. But I can't authorize
all users in spite of having a valid certificate, because the public
PKI.
.. what? You can authenticate some users (which) - what's the problem
with the others?
Any problem now
Then,
Hi Pshem,
I tried your suggestion but still didn't work. Any other suggestion?
Cheers,
Roy Kartadinata
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
s.org] On Behalf Of Pshem Kowalczyk
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 4:25 PM
To: FreeRadius users mailing
Hi,
I tried your suggestion but still didn't work. Any other suggestion?
Does anything get logged at all? Or are they only missing the
additional attribute?
kind regards
Pshem
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
We only missing Freeradius-Proxied-To attribute which is the most
important one.
Below is what we have for accounting setting:
Accounting {
detail
sql
}
Cheers,
Roy Kartadinata
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
s.org] On Behalf
Hi,
We only missing Freeradius-Proxied-To attribute which is the most
important one.
Below is what we have for accounting setting:
Accounting {
detail
sql
}
You have to do the logging in the pre-proxy section of the proxy
server, otherwise the server doesn't know yet that
Roy Kartadinata wrote:
I tried your suggestion but still didn't work. Any other suggestion?
Read the FAQ for it doesn't work.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
35 matches
Mail list logo
