Re: freeradius integration to new Open Directory

2012-05-28 Thread Alan DeKok
John wrote: Thanks for your quickly response. rlm_opendirectory request to install freeRADIUS on the Mac OSX Server. But our freeRADIUS is not on Mac OSX Server. Any idea? Install it on the Mac OSX Server? Or, configure FreeRADIUS to talk to OpenDirectory over LDAP. Alan DeKok. - List

No NAS-Port seen

2012-05-28 Thread Adam Karajah
Dears, I have freeradius installed on CentOS, and i am very interested in Simultaneous-use attribute to limit the number of logins per user. Anyway my nas seems to not sending NAS-Port attribute to freeradius which causes realm radutmp not to work. i looked all over the internet but i conuldnt

Re: No NAS-Port seen

2012-05-28 Thread Alan DeKok
Adam Karajah wrote: I have freeradius installed on CentOS, and i am very interested in Simultaneous-use attribute to limit the number of logins per user. Anyway my nas seems to not sending NAS-Port attribute to freeradius which causes realm radutmp not to work. i looked all over the internet

Re: No NAS-Port seen

2012-05-28 Thread Adam Karajah
Thanks Alan for your reply, But i read a post on a forum that suggests using the rlm_sql which is by the way much faster as */etc/raddb/sites-enabled/default* file in accounting section says. is this true ?? can simultaneous-use be activated using sql queries rather than radutmp realm.???!!!

Re: No NAS-Port seen

2012-05-28 Thread Alan DeKok
Adam Karajah wrote: But i read a post on a forum that suggests using the rlm_sql which is by the way much faster as */etc/raddb/sites-enabled/default* file in accounting section says. What, exactly does that have to do with the missing NAS-Port? is this true ?? can simultaneous-use be

Re: No NAS-Port seen

2012-05-28 Thread Adam Karajah
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.comwrote: Adam Karajah wrote: But i read a post on a forum that suggests using the rlm_sql which is by the way much faster as */etc/raddb/sites-enabled/default* file in accounting section says. What, exactly does that

Address already in use but server is not running

2012-05-28 Thread Michael Aldridge
I recently had to install debian 6.0 on one of my servers after a hard drive crash, and while I had freeradius running before, I can't seem to get it running now. I ran sudo apt-get install freeradius and hit enter to accept the additional packages, and I also installed dialup admin with the

Re: Address already in use but server is not running

2012-05-28 Thread Mike Coles
Can you run lsof to see what process has the port open? On May 28, 2012 5:35 PM, Michael Aldridge aldridge@gmail.com wrote: I recently had to install debian 6.0 on one of my servers after a hard drive crash, and while I had freeradius running before, I can't seem to get it running now. I

Re: Address already in use but server is not running

2012-05-28 Thread Michael Aldridge
I could if I knew how. manually sifting the output of lsof doesn't appear to include anything pertaining to that socket - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Re: Address already in use but server is not running

2012-05-28 Thread jeff donovan
On May 28, 2012, at 5:29 PM, Michael Aldridge wrote: I recently had to install debian 6.0 on one of my servers after a hard drive crash, and while I had freeradius running before, I can't seem to get it running now. I ran sudo apt-get install freeradius and hit enter to accept the

Re: Address already in use but server is not running

2012-05-28 Thread Michael Aldridge
yep, killing the offending process worked just fine. thanks for the help! - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html