That worked. Thank you!
Alan DeKok wrote:
> Colleen C. Morrissey wrote:
>> I don't have the clear text password. Your original reply said this
>> would work with clear text password or nt hash. I have the NT hash
>> and/or I can get the SHA1 base 64 encoded p
Hi,
> Why? If you have the clear-text password on the server, you can just
> compare the two. There's no need to configure rlm_pap to do the NT hash.
>
I don't have the clear text password. Your original reply said this
would work with clear text password or nt hash. I have the NT hash
: Running registered xlat function of module mschap for
string 'NT-Hash blah'
rlm_mschap: Unknown expansion string "NT-Hash blah"
radius_xlat: ''
rlm_pap: mschap xlat failed
rlm_pap: Passwords don't match
Colleen C. Morrissey wrote:
> Thanks! I had ldap
Thanks! I had ldap returning Password-with-Header for GTC deployment
and then added NT-Password for ms-chapv2. Commenting out the
password-with-header for userpassword in ldap.attrmap seems to allow
both to work. Which makes my life much easier :)
Alan Dekok wrote:
> Colleen C. Morris
Hi,
I am running version 1.1.6 and have had a successful 802.1x/PEAP-GTC
deployment for 3+ years. With Vista it looks like I have to move to
802.1x/PEAP-MSCHAPv2 - can not find peap-gtc supplicant. I was able to
get 802.1x/PEAP-MSCHAPv2 working.
My question is can I somehow support both simul
5 matches
Mail list logo