NAS-IP member of multiple huntgroups?

2005-05-06 Thread Wolfgang Hottgenroth
Hi, I'm wondering why it is prohibited to have a particular NAS-IP-Address in more than one huntgroup. I want to use huntgroups for roaming blocking: huntgroups: DE.HDN NAS-IP-Address == 10.0.0.1 DE NAS-IP-Address == 10.0.0.1 EMEANAS-IP-Address == 10.0.0.1

Ascend-Data-Filter parser very rigorous

2005-04-26 Thread Wolfgang Hottgenroth
Hi, the parser for Ascend-Data-Filter attributes in FreeRadius is very rigorous, following the definition in the Ascend Radius guide. However, the Ascend documentation seems to be a bit messy, since first there is the definition: Ascend-Data-Filter=ip dir action [dstip dest_ipaddr/subnet_mask]

Re: Ascend-Data-Filter parser very rigorous

2005-04-26 Thread Wolfgang Hottgenroth
Yep, done. Wolfgang At Tue, 26 Apr 2005 09:53:49 -0400, Alan DeKok wrote: Wolfgang Hottgenroth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What do you think? (Just in case of: I would volunteer to deliver a patch.) Sure, submit a patch to bugs.freeradius.org Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe

Question concerning vp_prints

2005-04-20 Thread Wolfgang Hottgenroth
Hi, I see in lib/print.c: static const char *vp_tokens[] = { ?, /* T_INVALID */ EOL,/* T_EOL */ {, }, (, ), ,, ;, +=, -=, :=, =, !=, =, , =, , =~, !~, =*, ~*, ==, #, BARE-WORD, \STRING\,

Re: Question concerning vp_prints

2005-04-20 Thread Wolfgang Hottgenroth
I'm sorry for not being very exact. This is about 1.0.2. I've checked CVS, it is there too. Wolfgang At Wed, 20 Apr 2005 22:36:32 +0200, Wolfgang Hottgenroth wrote: Hi, I see in lib/print.c: static const char *vp_tokens[] = { ?,/* T_INVALID

User-Category

2004-05-14 Thread Wolfgang Hottgenroth
Hi to you all! I've a question concerning the attribute User-Category (1029). It is not strictly FreeRADIUS related, but I read many times it origin was the Cistron Radius, and as FreeRADIUS is the descendant of Cistron somebody here might know an answer ... Andrei used the attribute

Order of attributes when using LDAP

2004-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Hottgenroth
Hi, I've a question concerning the rlm_ldap module. The order of radius attributes, especially of multiple values for one attribute, in the access-accept reply sent to the NAS is sometimes crucially. For instance for the ascend-data-filter attribute. Is there a way to guarantee this order when