El mar, 17-05-2005 a las 10:19 -0400, Dustin Doris escribió:
> Perhaps your ldap server might be running a little slow. Are you using
> openldap? If so, what version? Also, do you have the attributes you are
> searching with indexed? Finally, if you are using a BDB backend, what
> does your DB
Dustin Doris wrote:
I run freeradius server (1.0.2) with ldap support in a debian sarge
server. Last days I'm having the error message "Error: Dropping
conflicting packet due to unfinished request" a lot of times and the
server dies too frequently.
[...]
Perhaps your ldap
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I run freeradius server (1.0.2) with ldap support in a debian sarge
> server. Last days I'm having the error message "Error: Dropping
> conflicting packet due to unfinished request" a lot of times and th
Hello,
I run freeradius server (1.0.2) with ldap support in a debian sarge
server. Last days I'm having the error message "Error: Dropping
conflicting packet due to unfinished request" a lot of times and the
server dies too frequently.
I've seen in pr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Hampson) wrote:
> Which's this fix?
Revisions 1.83 through 1.87 of src/main/threads.c. The "exec" code
was cleaned up, which means lots of garbage was deleted.
The patches can be back-ported to 1.0.x, for a 1.0.3 release, but
I'd really like to release 1.1.0 one of th
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 02:05:04PM -0400, Alan DeKok wrote:
> Juan Nin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > also, another issue that worries me is that if I change my
> > authentication method on /etc/raddb/users so as to be the following:
> Ah... That's a bug in the "run external program" code. It's
Dustin Doris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is the same bug present in external programs when running with rlm_perl?
Hmm... I don't think so.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
> Juan Nin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have another radius running freeradius-0.9.3 on other server which is
> > executing external scripts, so I guess the bug wasn't present on
> > previous versions
> >
> > would it be to crazy to downgrade?
>
> I would suggest using the fixed code from CV
Juan Nin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have another radius running freeradius-0.9.3 on other server which is
> executing external scripts, so I guess the bug wasn't present on
> previous versions
>
> would it be to crazy to downgrade?
I would suggest using the fixed code from CVS. You shoul
Alan DeKok wrote:
if so, any idea on aprox. realesa date for 1.0.3? :)
Some time in the future.
I really need to execute an external script
I have another radius running freeradius-0.9.3 on other server which is
executing external scripts, so I guess the bug wasn't present on
previous version
Juan Nin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Maybe we should back-port some fixes, and release 1.0.3. 1.1.0 is
> > still a ways off, due to various craziness.
>
> that would be great!
> is this just an idea, or you've decided it?
>
> if so, any idea on aprox. realesa date for 1.0.3? :)
Some tim
Dustin Doris wrote:
If its suitable to change the authentication method to test a php script,
then its definately suitable to run in debug mode. I run in debug mode in
production whenever there is an issue. If you're fast in killing the pid
and starting in debug mode, then you won't lose any auth
Alan DeKok wrote:
also, another issue that worries me is that if I change my
authentication method on /etc/raddb/users so as to be the following:
Ah... That's a bug in the "run external program" code. It's fixed
in the latest CVS snapshot.
oh!!!
well, I think it's a bit good news then :P
For
Juan Nin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also, another issue that worries me is that if I change my
> authentication method on /etc/raddb/users so as to be the following:
Ah... That's a bug in the "run external program" code. It's fixed
in the latest CVS snapshot.
> should I run the radius in deb
> On Apr 4, 2005 10:14 PM, Alan DeKok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Mon Apr 4 12:15:58 2005 : Error: Dropping conflicting packet from
> > > client XXX:1645 - ID: 103 due to unfinished request 221
> >
> > Your database is too slow, or your NAS is too fast.
>
> mmhhh, database seems ok, I'm
On Apr 4, 2005 10:14 PM, Alan DeKok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Mon Apr 4 12:15:58 2005 : Error: Dropping conflicting packet from
> > client XXX:1645 - ID: 103 due to unfinished request 221
>
> Your database is too slow, or your NAS is too fast.
mmhhh, database seems ok, I'm not having per
Juan Nin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm running freeradius 1.0.1, for authentication and accounting under
> Fedora Core 2.
You should upgrade to 1.0.2.
> Mon Apr 4 12:15:58 2005 : Error: Dropping conflicting packet from
> client XXX:1645 - ID: 103 due to unfinished request 221
Your data
Hi!
I'm running freeradius 1.0.1, for authentication and accounting under
Fedora Core 2.
This radius receives about 5 or 6 new calls per minute using a simple
authentiaction method, using MySQL as backend for registering the calls.
Every day I'm seeing this error logs on my radius.log file:
Mon
18 matches
Mail list logo
