RE: MLPPP Acct-Session-Id

2011-04-11 Thread Jay Kuhne (jkuhne)
Cudbard-Bell Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2011 4:58 AM To: FreeRadius users mailing list Subject: Re: MLPPP Acct-Session-Id On Apr 2, 2011, at 12:34 AM, Alan DeKok wrote: > Jay Kuhne (jkuhne) wrote: >> Forgot to mention, also attempted with Acct-Multi-Session-Id, which was in the accounti

Re: MLPPP Acct-Session-Id

2011-04-02 Thread Arran Cudbard-Bell
On Apr 2, 2011, at 12:34 AM, Alan DeKok wrote: > Jay Kuhne (jkuhne) wrote: >> Forgot to mention, also attempted with Acct-Multi-Session-Id, which was in >> the accounting record but same result. > > I would say to ask the NAS manufacturer for a list of what they need > in the CoA packet, but t

Re: MLPPP Acct-Session-Id

2011-04-01 Thread Alan DeKok
Jay Kuhne (jkuhne) wrote: > Forgot to mention, also attempted with Acct-Multi-Session-Id, which was in > the accounting record but same result. I would say to ask the NAS manufacturer for a list of what they need in the CoA packet, but that doesn't seem to apply here. I'm not sure why CoA is

RE: MLPPP Acct-Session-Id

2011-04-01 Thread Jay Kuhne (jkuhne)
Jay Kuhne (jkuhne) Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 5:26 PM To: FreeRadius users mailing list Subject: RE: MLPPP Acct-Session-Id Hi Alan, Thanks again for your reply, I just wanted to follow-up with you. On the ASR1K BRAS we see the same Message-Authenticator when performing COA via PPP so that

RE: MLPPP Acct-Session-Id

2011-03-31 Thread Jay Kuhne (jkuhne)
users mailing list Subject: RE: MLPPP Acct-Session-Id Okay thanks. I'll do some investigating and let you know. It may be a little bit but I will reply with my findings. Jay -Original Message- From: freeradius-users-bounces+jkuhne=cisco@lists.freeradius.org [mailto:freeradius-use

RE: MLPPP Acct-Session-Id

2011-03-29 Thread Jay Kuhne (jkuhne)
g] On Behalf Of Alan DeKok Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 10:20 AM To: FreeRadius users mailing list Subject: Re: MLPPP Acct-Session-Id Jay Kuhne (jkuhne) wrote: > Do you know of a syntax on Radclient for defining the > "Message-Authenticator attribute"? It's jus

Re: MLPPP Acct-Session-Id

2011-03-29 Thread Alan DeKok
Jay Kuhne (jkuhne) wrote: > Do you know of a syntax on Radclient for defining the > "Message-Authenticator attribute"? It's just like any other attribute... Message-Authenticator = "" > I'll see if I can find it in the accounting record, get it working and > then follow-up as to why th

RE: MLPPP Acct-Session-Id

2011-03-29 Thread Jay Kuhne (jkuhne)
Kuhne (jkuhne) Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 9:08 AM To: FreeRadius users mailing list Subject: RE: MLPPP Acct-Session-Id Hi Alan, Thanks for your reply. I think the bottom line is I need to do some more investigation. I tried a PPP vs. MLPPP session and my COAs work as expected. I'll see if I

RE: MLPPP Acct-Session-Id

2011-03-29 Thread Jay Kuhne (jkuhne)
radius.org [mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+jkuhne=cisco@lists.freeradius.org] On Behalf Of Alan DeKok Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 1:50 AM To: FreeRadius users mailing list Subject: Re: MLPPP Acct-Session-Id Jay Kuhne (jkuhne) wrote: > Is there another attribute syntax on radclient that co

Re: MLPPP Acct-Session-Id

2011-03-28 Thread Alan DeKok
Jay Kuhne (jkuhne) wrote: > Is there another attribute syntax on radclient that could be used aside from > Acct-Session-Id to perform COA to a session I'm not sure I can parse that. I *think* the correct response is to say "read the NAS documentation". If the NAS accepts CoA packets, the d

RE: MLPPP Acct-Session-Id

2011-03-28 Thread Jay Kuhne (jkuhne)
f Jay Kuhne (jkuhne) Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 10:43 PM To: FreeRadius users mailing list Subject: MLPPP Acct-Session-Id Hi, Is there another attribute syntax on radclient that could be used aside from Acct-Session-Id to perform COA to a session We are using MultilinkPPP (single session per b

MLPPP Acct-Session-Id

2011-03-28 Thread Jay Kuhne (jkuhne)
Hi, Is there another attribute syntax on radclient that could be used aside from Acct-Session-Id to perform COA to a session We are using MultilinkPPP (single session per bundle still) and it is not working as it normally would with PPP. Thanks, Jay RADIUS: COA received from id 48 x.x.x.99: