]
s.org
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
reeradius.org] On Behalf Of John Dennis
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 3:56 PM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Building Installing on Red Hat Systems (Was: Make
error - Solved)
There has been a fair amount of confusion over how to get
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 09:44:08AM -0800, J Santos wrote:
I 've followed the faq instructions and I have now the following packages
available.
freeradius-2.1.1-7.x86_64.rpmfreeradius-perl-2.1.1-7.x86_64.rpm
freeradius-devel-2.1.1-7.x86_64.rpm
Install the freeradius-libs first.
rpm -ivh freeradius-2.1.1-7.x86_64.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
libfreeradius-eap-2.1.1.so()(64bit) is needed by
freeradius-2.1.1-7.x86_64
libfreeradius-radius-2.1.1.so()(64bit) is needed by
freeradius-2.1.1-7.x86_64
-
List
Hi,
There has been a fair amount of confusion over how to get FreeRADIUS
packages for Fedora, RHEL, and CentOS, how to perform a build if a
pre-built package is not available, and how to do some basic maintenance
tasks.
it would help immensely if Fedora, RHEL, CentOS et al actually
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 10:28:40AM +0100, Alan DeKok wrote:
John Dennis wrote:
So I've created a new FreeRADIUS wiki page with Red Hat specific
information:
http://wiki.freeradius.org/Red_Hat_FAQ
Thanks. I've added a file redhat/README telling people to please go
read that
Alan DeKok wrote:
Thanks. I've added a file redhat/README telling people to please go
read that document.
You're welcome. It's a good start and I hope it helps. FWIW we try to
make sure the thousands of software packages in our distributions are
well supported, it can be a daunting
J Santos wrote:
Thank you Dennis,
It is a very, very useful document.
Checking both distros RHEL and CentOS there are only old packages available
(version 1.1.3) and only i386.
I have a rpm already built but it is not properly working.
Based on what you described in the doc I better
Hi,
The main download page on freeradius.org has a link to:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=298
Which has RPMs of recent versions. But who reads the web page?
your typical rh/fed/centos user would never visit the homepage
of the program/utility they are
Jos Vos wrote:
RHEL (and thus CentOS) are conservative enterprise distros and thus
do *not* include the newest (bleeding edge) release of everything
as soon as it comes out. They want to stay compatible through the
7 (!) years of support time. This is how it is and this is, in
principle, a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it would help immensely if Fedora, RHEL, CentOS et al actually
supplied up to date version of FreeRADIUS - ie at least 2.0.5
(if not 2.1.1 !) rather than the historic 1.1.x (or even 1.0.x!)
The main download page on freeradius.org has a link to:
John Dennis wrote:
There has been a fair amount of confusion over how to get FreeRADIUS
packages for Fedora, RHEL, and CentOS, how to perform a build if a
pre-built package is not available, and how to do some basic maintenance
tasks.
So I've created a new FreeRADIUS wiki page with Red Hat
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 10:47:08AM +0100, Alan DeKok wrote:
It should be easier for *new* installs to use 2.x. Otherwise, they
install the latest RHEL version, and then get told to upgrade.
This is unrealistic. How should RH maintain a sliding base? And what
does RHEL5 mean if the version
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 09:18:25AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it would help immensely if Fedora, RHEL, CentOS et al actually
supplied up to date version of FreeRADIUS - ie at least 2.0.5
(if not 2.1.1 !) rather than the historic 1.1.x (or even 1.0.x!)
if such a version was available
Jos Vos wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 09:18:25AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it would help immensely if Fedora, RHEL, CentOS et al actually
supplied up to date version of FreeRADIUS - ie at least 2.0.5
(if not 2.1.1 !) rather than the historic 1.1.x (or even 1.0.x!)
if such a version
John Dennis wrote:
Alan DeKok wrote:
Thanks. I've added a file redhat/README telling people to please go
read that document.
You're welcome. It's a good start and I hope it helps. FWIW we try to
make sure the thousands of software packages in our distributions are
well supported, it
Jos Vos wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 10:47:08AM +0100, Alan DeKok wrote:
It should be easier for *new* installs to use 2.x. Otherwise, they
install the latest RHEL version, and then get told to upgrade.
This is unrealistic. How should RH maintain a sliding base?
I didn't say
Hi,
The current version of FreeRADIUS in RHEL5/CentOS is 1.1.3. It is very
unlikely the 1.1.3 version will ever be removed from RHEL5 because of
the commitment for version stability in an enterprise distribution. On
whoah.
apart from the fact that 1.1.3 had so many bugs and doesnt work
Santos; 'FreeRadius users mailing list'
Subject: Re: Make error - Solved
Don't know. If you look in the .spec file you'll see what additional
work is done in the package that isn't done otherwise. In addition
to init.d you may need to deal with logrotate.d and pam.d, ldconfig
and chkconfig
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 9:46 AM
To: J Santos
Subject: Re: Make error - Solved
It sounds like something went wrong in the rpmbuild. That
script should
have been included. The base script is included in
~/rpmbuild/BUILD/freeradius-server-2.1.1/redhat/rc.radiusd-redhat.
That should
?
The init script is not on /etc/rc.d/init.deither
-Original Message-
From: Ted Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 10:13 AM
To: J Santos; FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: Make error - Solved (not yet)
Do you have the coreutils package
Ok, now you've opened another can of worms...
First, run rpm -qlp freeradius-server-2.1.1-0.i386.rpm and see if the
missing files are listed as actually being in the package. Their either
not in there, or in there but not being deployed. It would be helpful to
know which. (adjust that name
There has been a fair amount of confusion over how to get FreeRADIUS
packages for Fedora, RHEL, and CentOS, how to perform a build if a
pre-built package is not available, and how to do some basic maintenance
tasks.
So I've created a new FreeRADIUS wiki page with Red Hat specific
on Red Hat Systems (Was: Make
error - Solved)
There has been a fair amount of confusion over how to get FreeRADIUS
packages for Fedora, RHEL, and CentOS, how to perform a build if a
pre-built package is not available, and how to do some basic
maintenance
tasks.
So I've created a new
Hi all,
I am posting this so it can save some headaches for other people in the
future.
I've been trying to install FR on a 64 bits OS for a while. First I tried RH
5.2 and I got the following errors
/usr/bin/libtool --mode=link gcc -o radmin
radmin.lo /usr/lib/libreadline.so
I assume that you are referring to a build from source as opposed to an
rpmbuild from source?
If that's the case you would want to review this:
http://wiki.freeradius.org/Build#Building_RedHat_packages
-Ted-
Olavo wrote:
Hi all,
I am posting this so it can save some headaches for other
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: Make error - Solved
I assume that you are referring to a build from source as
opposed to an
rpmbuild from source?
If that's the case you would want to review this:
http://wiki.freeradius.org/Build#Building_RedHat_packages
-Ted-
Olavo wrote
Lum
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2008 12:04 PM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: Make error - Solved
I assume that you are referring to a build from source as
opposed to an
rpmbuild from source?
If that's the case you would want to review this:
http://wiki.freeradius.org/Build
27 matches
Mail list logo
