Memory big problem

2005-12-13 Thread Dmitry V. Pleganoff
And to you thanks. Can i offer small patch for realization of comparison (!~) in rlm_checkval? --- rlm_checkval.c 2005-12-14 03:38:08.0 +1000 +++ rlm_checkval.c.patched 2005-12-14 10:15:59.0 +1000 @@ -208,6 +208,7 @@ VALUE_PAIR *chk_vp, *item_vp;

Re: Memory big problem

2005-12-12 Thread Nicolas Baradakis
Dimple wrote: I installed latest freeradius cvs-snapshot freeradius-snapshot-20051130 on Debian Linux 10 vs Oracle db 10 and Oracle Internet Directory (LDAP) 10. I have about 30 clients in clients.conf and about 30 connections in a second, including accounting requests. I have 8G RAM on

Memory big problem

2005-12-12 Thread Dmitry V. Pleganoff
Thanks, I have tried Valgrind. Valgrind have given out as a result of 20 losses and possible losses of memory. Basically from several bytes up to 200 kbytes for 30 seconds of work. The largest following. ... ... ... ==8528== 11032016 (72220 direct, 10959796 indirect) bytes in 785 blocks are

Memory big problem

2005-12-12 Thread Dmitry V. Pleganoff
By the way, rlm_checkval meets in most cases losses ==8528== 200448 bytes in 783 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 178 of 190 ... ==8528==by 0x1BB83E41: regcomp (in /lib/tls/libc-2.3.2.so) ==8528==by 0x1D310FC3: do_checkval (rlm_checkval.c:275) ... ==8528== 60416 bytes in 59

Memory big problem

2005-12-11 Thread Dimple
Hi everyone, I installed latest freeradius cvs-snapshot freeradius-snapshot-20051130 on Debian Linux 10 vs Oracle db 10 and Oracle Internet Directory (LDAP) 10. I have about 30 clients in clients.conf and about 30 connections in a second, including accounting requests. I have 8G RAM on server and

Re: Memory big problem

2005-12-11 Thread Alan DeKok
Dimple [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I installed latest freeradius cvs-snapshot freeradius-snapshot-20051130 on Debian Linux 10 vs Oracle db 10 and Oracle Internet Directory (LDAP) 10. I have about 30 clients in clients.conf and about 30 connections in a second, including accounting requests. I