us users mailing list'
Subject: RE: Proxy Maintenance Process
Perhaps some sort of access list or host (/32) null route to make the NAS think
the home server is dead?
-Original Message-
From: freeradius-users-bounces+ggatten=waddell@lists.freeradius.org
[mailto:freer
Alan DeKok
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 5:27 PM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: Proxy Maintenance Process
Brian Carpio wrote:
> So are there any other options then restarting radiusd?
>
> I have tried to comment out a home_server and even send a hup:
>
> radmin -e
Brian Carpio wrote:
> So are there any other options then restarting radiusd?
>
> I have tried to comment out a home_server and even send a hup:
>
> radmin -e "hup"
>
> But that doesn't see to make freeradius reread the proxy.conf file...
That won't work. Home servers aren't reloaded on HUP
half Of Brian Carpio
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 11:47 AM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: RE: Proxy Maintenance Process
Part of the problem is that during an upgrade our radius application still
listens on port 1813 and 1812 and replies to the keepalves (working with
development to
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 07:18:52AM +0100, Alan DeKok wrote:
> Brian Candler wrote:
> > "WARNING
> >
> > This tool is experimental and should not be used in production
> > environments."
> >
> > (Just quoting the manpage... maybe it's more paranoid than necessary)
>
> From an old version of the
Brian Candler wrote:
> "WARNING
>
> This tool is experimental and should not be used in production
> environments."
>
> (Just quoting the manpage... maybe it's more paranoid than necessary)
From an old version of the server. It no longer says that.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubsc
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 07:44:41PM +0100, Alan DeKok wrote:
> > what is the “best practice” in regards to putting
> > home_servers into maintenance so that freeradiusd doesn’t attempt to
> > send traffic to them?
>
> Use "radmin"
>
> radmin> set home server state IP PORT dead
"WARNING
This to
Brian Carpio wrote:
>
> Currently we are using freeradiusd to proxy / load balance requests to
> our backend radius application. However as I'm sure many of you
> encounter there are times which require maintenance / upgrades of the
> backend servers, what is the "best practice" in regards to
ry 04, 2011 11:45 AM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: Proxy Maintenance Process
Brian Carpio wrote:
> Currently we are using freeradiusd to proxy / load balance requests to
> our backend radius application. However as I’m sure many of you
> encounter there are times
Brian Carpio wrote:
> Currently we are using freeradiusd to proxy / load balance requests to
> our backend radius application. However as I’m sure many of you
> encounter there are times which require maintenance / upgrades of the
> backend servers, what is the “best practice” in regards to putting
Hi All,
Currently we are using freeradiusd to proxy / load balance requests to our
backend radius application. However as I'm sure many of you encounter there are
times which require maintenance / upgrades of the backend servers, what is the
"best practice" in regards to putting home_servers in
11 matches
Mail list logo
