Stungo, Jamie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are experiencing some unexpected behaviour of freeradius on our
Solaris 9 platform.
0.9.3 has issues on Solaris. I don't know if those issues would
cause the problem you're seeing, but they might.
1.0.1 has different (endian) issues on Sparc, but
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Stungo, Jamie wrote:
Hi all,
We are experiencing some unexpected behaviour of freeradius on our Solaris 9
platform. We use two V240 dual processor SPARC machines, LDAP back-end, flat
file accounting. I have heavily indexed the directory and it seems lightning
fast, slapd
-Original Message-
From: Kostas Kalevras [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 10/5/2004 11:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject:Re: 0.9.3 Solaris performance problem
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Stungo, Jamie wrote:
Hi all,
We are experiencing some unexpected behaviour
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 10/5/2004 11:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Solaris performance problem
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Stungo, Jamie wrote:
Hi all,
We are experiencing some unexpected behaviour of freeradius on our Solaris 9
platform. We use two
. Is it
prstat reporting incorrectly?
JS
-Original Message-
From: Robert Banniza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 10/6/2004 1:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject:Re: 0.9.3 Solaris performance problem
Have you tried putting the process under truss (truss -fp PID) to see
10/6/2004 1:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Solaris performance problem
Have you tried putting the process under truss (truss -fp PID) to see
what kind of system calls are being made by radius? This may give you an
idea of what is going on.
Robert
On Wed
-Original Message-
From: Robert Banniza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 10/6/2004 1:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Solaris performance problem
Have you tried putting the process under truss (truss -fp PID) to see
what kind of system calls are being made by radius
7 matches
Mail list logo