Alan Dekok wrote:
> Alan Dekok wrote:
>> Another thing for 2.0.0 (maybe) is to have per-socket configuration.
>> i.e. socket X can have authorization section X, and socket Y can have
>> authorization section Y.
>>
>> It may not be too hard to add, in fact.
>
> Yup. 300 lines of code.
>
>
Alan Dekok wrote:
> Another thing for 2.0.0 (maybe) is to have per-socket configuration.
> i.e. socket X can have authorization section X, and socket Y can have
> authorization section Y.
>
> It may not be too hard to add, in fact.
Yup. 300 lines of code.
The "listener" sections already
Phil Mayers wrote:
> Running redundant servers doesn't help much in this case for 2 reasons:
> first, we've found that Cisco APs are very, very poor at detecting dead
> radius servers and moving to the backup; second, it seems to be
> malformed data coming from a certain client so if the APs do
Alan Dekok wrote:
> Jaume wrote:
>> Can my machine run 2 FreeRadius at the same time? Each FreeRadius in a
>> diferent IP but simultanously in the same CPU and O.S.? Somebody tell
>> me thats possible if each radius is reading from a diferent PATH...
>
> As Josh said, yes.
>
> But why? The s
Jaume wrote:
> Can my machine run 2 FreeRadius at the same time? Each FreeRadius in a
> diferent IP but simultanously in the same CPU and O.S.? Somebody tell
> me thats possible if each radius is reading from a diferent PATH...
As Josh said, yes.
But why? The server can be configured to list
Hi Jaume,
> Can my machine run 2 FreeRadius at the same time? Each
> FreeRadius in a diferent IP but simultanously in the same CPU
> and O.S.? Somebody tell me thats possible if each radius is
> reading from a diferent PATH...
>
> Thanks for any documentacion, link or kind of help.
$ man rad
6 matches
Mail list logo