Zitat von Nicolas Baradakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Michael Check wrote:
>
> > On 8/22/06, Michael Check <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > We tried googling around and we're happy to hear that freeradius will
> > > be a part of 10.5, but we'd like to get it running now... There
> > > really is no ot
Michael Check wrote:
> On 8/22/06, Michael Check <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We tried googling around and we're happy to hear that freeradius will
> > be a part of 10.5, but we'd like to get it running now... There
> > really is no other docs we've found on getting it compiled (after
> > diff
On 8/22/06, Michael Check <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We tried googling around and we're happy to hear that freeradius will
be a part of 10.5, but we'd like to get it running now... There
really is no other docs we've found on getting it compiled (after
difficulty like the above) and installed.
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 01:49:21PM -0400, Alan DeKok said:
> "Michael Check" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In terms of accessing binaries or libs, would it have anything to do
> > with permissions? Is that possible?
>
> No. And it's annoying as hell, because the modules *can* use the
> radlog
I followed the info in the Mac OS Read Me file, which is included in
the Docs folder I believe. I uncommented the references to rlm_eap
and rlm_sql, but see the Doc for more info on how to do that and where.
/L
Den 24/08/2006 kl. 17.04 skrev Michael Check:
On 8/24/06, Lasse <[EMAIL PROTEC
"Michael Check" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In terms of accessing binaries or libs, would it have anything to do
> with permissions? Is that possible?
No. And it's annoying as hell, because the modules *can* use the
radlog() function, which is in the server core. But they can't seem
to use t
On 8/24/06, Lasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can't say for sure what the problem is, but 1.0.5 is the last one I
have been able to get running on Mac OS X.
Thanks Lasse, can you tell me a bit about your environment in which it
worked? (OSX version, DeveloperTools version, platform, etc.) D
I can't say for sure what the problem is, but 1.0.5 is the last one I
have been able to get running on Mac OS X.
/L
Den 24/08/2006 kl. 15.51 skrev Stephen Gran:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 09:02:43AM -0500, Michael Check said:
On 8/23/06, Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I _think_ that
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 09:02:43AM -0500, Michael Check said:
> On 8/23/06, Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I _think_ that it blows up in rlm_exec because it's the first module
> >that uses a symbol from the radiusd binary (as opposed to a library).
> >I also think this has something to
On 8/23/06, Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I _think_ that it blows up in rlm_exec because it's the first module
that uses a symbol from the radiusd binary (as opposed to a library).
I also think this has something to do with the mystery that is OS X's
linker namespaces. Beyond that, I'm
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 07:40:00AM -0500, Michael Check said:
> On 8/22/06, Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Can you try 1.1.3 (in CVS right now, due Any Day Now) and see if it does
> >better? There was a substantial build system rework involved.
>
> I tried it. ./configure, make, make
On 8/22/06, Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did rlm_exec actually get built and installed?
Yes, as far as I can tell, it was in /usr/local/lib
Can you try 1.1.3 (in CVS right now, due Any Day Now) and see if it does
better? There was a substantial build system rework involved.
I tr
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 12:02:42PM +0200, Nicolas Baradakis said:
> Michael Check wrote:
>
> > There really is no other docs we've found on getting it compiled
> > (after difficulty like the above) and installed. Certainly nothing
> > recent anyway. Is it true that it _should_ just work? :)
>
>
Hi Michael,
i was able to build freeradius (at least without any sql support) just yesterday
from the latests cvs snapshot without any modifications. maybe you could try
this or wait (one day or two?) until the next release (1.1.3).
regards
markus
Zitat von Michael Check <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Michael Check wrote:
> There really is no other docs we've found on getting it compiled
> (after difficulty like the above) and installed. Certainly nothing
> recent anyway. Is it true that it _should_ just work? :)
Please try version 1.1.3, available on www.freeradius.org. The build
tools (aut
On 8/23/06, Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:14:30PM -0500, Michael Check said:
> Hi all,
>
> If you try and compile _without_ --disable_shared, the we get through
> make with this at the end:
>
{cut}
> Module: Library search path is /usr/local/lib
> radiusd.c
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:14:30PM -0500, Michael Check said:
> Hi all,
>
> If you try and compile _without_ --disable_shared, the we get through
> make with this at the end:
>
> /usr/local/src/freeradius-1.1.2/libtool --mode=link gcc -o radwho
> radwho.lo util.lo log.lo conffile.lo -lresolv -
17 matches
Mail list logo
