Re: Re: Raadrelay and coredumps..

2005-03-01 Thread Stefan . Neis
Terry J Fike Jr schrieb: Okay, quick (and possible moot) question... could there be issues on this because of compiling it 64bit instead of 32 bit? Actually what for? You do realize that there are a couple of _dis_advantages of building 64bit stuff (larger executables, more memory

Re: Raadrelay and coredumps...

2005-02-28 Thread Terry J Fike Jr
*sigh* okay, first off, shoot me...i didn't read /doc/bugs right and i hadn't recompiled with the --enable-developer so, i did that...same output from the core (Couldn't find general-purpose registers in core file) recompiled it a couple times... once with just --disable-shared still cores...

Re: Raadrelay and coredumps...

2005-02-28 Thread Alan DeKok
Terry J Fike Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: so, i did that...same output from the core (Couldn't find general-purpose registers in core file) That's very strange. once with just --disable-shared still cores... Did you do that after deleting *all* files installed by the server? If one of

Re: Re: Raadrelay and coredumps...

2005-02-28 Thread Terry J Fike Jr
I did amake distclean before ./configure each time and i ran the radrelay from inside src/main (i didn't do make install on any of these runs) with the exception of the radiusd.conf file, i've been using pretty much the same config files since 0.8.3 (though i think i changed to the new

Re: Raadrelay and coredumps...

2005-02-28 Thread Alan DeKok
Terry J Fike Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I did amake distclean before ./configure each time The *installed* files may be causing problems. and i ran the radrelay from inside src/main (i didn't do make install on any of these runs) Hmm... I can't recall any issues with radrelay.

Re: Re: Raadrelay and coredumps...

2005-02-28 Thread Terry J Fike Jr
Terry J Fike Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I did amake distclean before ./configure each time The *installed* files may be causing problems. even if i'm telling a different prefix each time? (i ask because i have 1.0.2 in /usr/local and 1.0.0 in /opt) as i make new versions i just change

Re: Raadrelay and coredumps..

2005-02-28 Thread Alan DeKok
Terry J Fike Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: could there be issues on this because of compiling it 64bit instead of 32 bit? Most of my older versions were 32 bit, but since getting oracle installed 64 bit finally, i installed the newer (1.0.0 and 1.0.2) 64bit? That certainly could be the

Re: Raadrelay and coredumps...

2005-02-28 Thread Alan DeKok
Terry J Fike Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The *installed* files may be causing problems. even if i'm telling a different prefix each time? Yes. If the dynamic linker knows to find the modules under one prefix, it may find those modules when building another version of the server on the