Which Linux Distro is recommended for running FreeRadius 2.1 ?
I'm looking to avoid having to compile Samba by hand.
Thanks.
-Neil
--
Neil Johnson
Network Engineer
Information Technology Services
The University of Iowa
319 384-0938
neil-john...@uiowa.edu
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe?
Johnson, Neil M wrote:
Which Linux Distro is recommended for running FreeRadius 2.1 ?
Debian, Ubuntu, Suse, etc. all are fine.
For Samba... look for at least 3.4.9 or 3.5.6. If it isn't available,
you'll have to compile it by hand.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
On 11/03/2010 01:38 PM, Johnson, Neil M wrote:
Which Linux Distro is recommended for running FreeRadius 2.1 ?
I'm partial to Fedora :-)
Fedora makes a point of being current, integrating the latest releases.
Fedora releases on about a 6 month cycle, F14 was just released
yesterday. Fedora
John Dennis wrote:
I'm partial to Fedora :-)
Yes, sorry. John has been an active member contributing to
FreeRADIUS, which has been very valuable.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Hi,
I'm partial to Fedora :-)
I agree. never had a problem with Fedora Core or CentOS with FR - be
it a supplied RPM or a home build. very nice base OS to work with.
alan
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
the password. The problem is *not* the tool
used to retrieve the password.
If I do have NT hashed passwords in LDAP, is PEAP with ntlm_auth the
recommendation?
No.
MS-CHAP requires access to the NT hash to execute the
challenge/response. This means you have 3 options:
1. Use a datastore containing
Paul Dugas wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com wrote:
Use PEAP. Ensure passwords are in a form compatible with PEAP:
My LDAP directory contains NT, LM, and SSHA passwords but not
clear-text so, if I'm following correctly, I need to look into using
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com wrote:
Paul Dugas wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com
wrote:
Use PEAP. Ensure passwords are in a form compatible with PEAP:
My LDAP directory contains NT, LM, and SSHA
Paul Dugas wrote:
The settings in NetworkManager on my Fedora Linux laptop, when I
choose WPAWPA2-Enterprise and PEAP, allow MSCHAPv2 (default), MD5,
and GTC for the inner authentication. I see on the protocol
compatibility table you referenced that only clear-text and ntlm_auth
are
to retrieve the password.
If I do have NT hashed passwords in LDAP, is PEAP with ntlm_auth the
recommendation?
Thanks for the guidance,
Paul
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
is *not* the tool
used to retrieve the password.
If I do have NT hashed passwords in LDAP, is PEAP with ntlm_auth the
recommendation?
No.
I suggest reading my messages again. It's clear you don't understand
what ntlm_auth does.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com wrote:
I suggest reading my messages again. It's clear you don't understand
what ntlm_auth does.
Sorry if I've offended you.
Are you saying that I should be able to enable ldap in inner-tunnel
and it should be able to
On 08/17/2010 05:31 PM, Paul Dugas wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Alan DeKokal...@deployingradius.com wrote:
I suggest reading my messages again. It's clear you don't understand
what ntlm_auth does.
Sorry if I've offended you.
Are you saying that I should be able to enable ldap
I've got an OpenLDAP directory using the SMB-LDAP schema and tools.
Also have a FreeRadius 1.x instance setup to support authentication of
PPTP users on my m0n0wall machine. The system has worked fine for a
few years.
I'm now looking to setup WPA2-Enterprises WiFi access and am looking
for
Paul Dugas wrote:
I need to support primarily WinXP wireless clients but I also need my
Linux (Fedora) machines to work as well as a few smartphones
(Blackberry, iPhone, etc).
Use PEAP. Ensure passwords are in a form compatible with PEAP:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com wrote:
Use PEAP. Ensure passwords are in a form compatible with PEAP:
My LDAP directory contains NT, LM, and SSHA passwords but not
clear-text so, if I'm following correctly, I need to look into using
ntlm_auth. The docs
Message -
From: A L M Buxey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FreeRadius users mailing list freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 5:28:00 PM GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland, Portugal
Subject: Re: Load testing tool recommendation
Hi,
Hmm.. I *am* referencing the radius server
Anders Holm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Curious... It's a fairly beefy Linux box with GigE NIC
What kind of NIC? There are some (cheap) cards which are using the CPU
pretty heavily.
cheers,
Jens
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Berlin: http://www.guug.de/lokal/berlin/index.html
: Load testing tool recommendation
Wireless could be the problem if you have some wireless links between
radius server and your NAS.
Alan DeKok wrote:
Anders Holm wrote:
In my tests, radclient has been /slower/ the radtest processes forked from a
Perl script.
100 requests using my forking
Hi,
Nope, no wireless involved.
Good thought though! :)
its not doing DNS lookups each time is it?
alan
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
-users@lists.freeradius.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 2:55:56 PM GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland, Portugal
Subject: Re: Load testing tool recommendation
Hi,
Nope, no wireless involved.
Good thought though! :)
its not doing DNS lookups each time is it?
alan
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
Hi,
Hmm.. I *am* referencing the radius server with FQDN ... Lemme flip that
switch and see what I get to play with ...
Good catch .. It's letting me ship some more packets through per second.. no
final figures yet, but starting to hit 5k pkts/sec, though the radius server
is still not
Anders Holm wrote:
In my tests, radclient has been /slower/ the radtest processes forked from a
Perl script.
100 requests using my forking Perl script takes 2.2 seconds to complete.
100 requests using radclient takes ~8x, i.e 16.7+ seconds to complete.
You can run radclient -x to see
Wireless could be the problem if you have some wireless links between
radius server and your NAS.
Alan DeKok wrote:
Anders Holm wrote:
In my tests, radclient has been /slower/ the radtest processes forked from a
Perl script.
100 requests using my forking Perl script takes 2.2 seconds to
, that is a possibility as
well ...
//anders
- Original Message -
From: Ivan Kalik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FreeRadius users mailing list freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
Sent: Friday, May 9, 2008 4:26:37 PM GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland, Portugal
Subject: Re: Load testing tool recommendation
http
So, I'm building a complete solution, from scratch.
As such, the business owners have some requirements on how many requests it
should be handle today per second and some point in the future as well.
Would there be any good load testing tools, or some handy way to figure out how
many tps my
http://wiki.freeradius.org/Radclient
Ivan Kalik
Kalik Informatika ISP
Dana 9/5/2008, Anders Holm [EMAIL PROTECTED] piše:
So, I'm building a complete solution, from scratch.
As such, the business owners have some requirements on how many requests it
should be handle today per second and some
27 matches
Mail list logo
