RE: Session-Timeout and Cisco

2004-03-04 Thread Truong Manh Cuong
Session-Timeout = 64 Finished request 4 Going to the next request -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Guy Fraser Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 11:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Session-Timeout and Cisco Try Session

Re: Session-Timeout and Cisco

2004-03-04 Thread Alan DeKok
Truong Manh Cuong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've try to use rlm_sqlcounter, it works but I don't see anything happen after a period of Session-Timeout: After 64 seconds of Session-Timeout, Radius don't reject that connection. RADIUS doesn't force connections off-line. Read the FAQ about

Re: Session-Timeout and Cisco

2004-03-04 Thread apellido
Hello, your NAS is the one who responsible to disconnect the user. Try to check your NAS. - Original Message - From: Truong Manh Cuong [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 4:17 PM Subject: RE: Session-Timeout and Cisco Hi, I've try to use

Session-Timeout and Cisco

2004-03-03 Thread Andrew E. Guly
FreeRadius 0.9.0, Cisco 3640 as client. I'am using freeradius for authenticate dialup users. External perl-script checks user's account on database, calc $acct_session_timeout variable and output text string with this: print Session-Timeout = .$acct_session_timeout.\n; But Cisco don't drop

RE: Session-Timeout and Cisco

2004-03-03 Thread Mustafa N. Deeb
www.palsms.com www.paltime.net www.palnet.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Truong Manh Cuong Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 11:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Session-Timeout and Cisco Hi Andrew I have the same

RE: Session-Timeout and Cisco

2004-03-03 Thread Truong Manh Cuong
www.palsms.com www.paltime.net www.palnet.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Truong Manh Cuong Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 11:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Session-Timeout and Cisco Hi Andrew I have the same

RE: Session-Timeout and Cisco

2004-03-03 Thread Mustafa N. Deeb
www.palsms.com www.paltime.net www.palnet.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Truong Manh Cuong Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 11:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Session-Timeout and Cisco Hi Andrew I

RE: Session-Timeout and Cisco

2004-03-03 Thread Truong Manh Cuong
Hi,I use radtest:radtest [EMAIL PROTECTED] abcd local 0 testing123Aaa debug:Sending Access-Accept of id 126 to 127.0.0.1:32842 Session-Timeout:= 6324 Service-Type:= Framed-User Framed-Protocol:=PPP .. the same result in radtest. Could you please give me some advise. Thanks and

RE: Session-Timeout and Cisco

2004-03-03 Thread Mustafa N. Deeb
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Truong Manh Cuong Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 12:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Session-Timeout and Cisco Hi, I use radtest: radtest [EMAIL PROTECTED] abcd local 0 testing123 Aaa debug: Sending Access-Accept of id 126 to 127.0.0.1:32842 Session-Timeout:= 6324

Re: Session-Timeout and Cisco

2004-03-03 Thread Guy Fraser
Try Session-Timeout = 1234. If the debug info from the cisco is correct, then the data sent to the cisco shouldn't work. To the best of my knowledge cisco doesn't understand the := operator. := is a rlm_sql operator and should not be sent in a radius response. By the time the data is ready to

Re: Session-Timeout and Cisco

2004-03-03 Thread Alan DeKok
Guy Fraser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To the best of my knowledge cisco doesn't understand the := operator. := is a rlm_sql operator and should not be sent in a radius response. It isn't sent in the packet, so it's irrelevant. By the time the data is ready to send the radius responce the :=

RE: Session-Timeout and Cisco

2004-03-03 Thread Truong Manh Cuong
:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Session-Timeout and Cisco Try Session-Timeout = 1234. If the debug info from the cisco is correct, then the data sent to the cisco shouldn't work. To the best of my knowledge cisco doesn't understand the := operator. := is a rlm_sql operator and should