Re: Shared secret is incorrect - but it is identical!

2007-07-06 Thread ken
Alan DeKok wrote: (1) The shared secret is wrong (2) The code is buggy There are no alternatives. This is often due to broken MD5 libraries, or 32/64-bit issues. But FreeRADIUS hasn't had those kind of bugs for *years*. Yep, you were right, there must be some corruption or

Re: Shared secret is incorrect - but it is identical!

2007-07-05 Thread ken
Alan DeKok wrote: (1) The shared secret is wrong (2) The code is buggy There are no alternatives. This is often due to broken MD5 libraries, or 32/64-bit issues. But FreeRADIUS hasn't had those kind of bugs for *years*. I suspect you may well be right. Upgrading FC6 hasn't

Re: Shared secret is incorrect - but it is identical!

2007-07-04 Thread ken
Josh Howlett wrote: What happens if, using radtest, you specify the username *without* the realm from the remote machine? It fails just the same way It fails whether user is in /etc/passwd or /etc/raddb/users It fails whether Auth := local is in there or not It fails whether I check for

Re: Shared secret is incorrect - but it is identical!

2007-07-04 Thread ken
Edvin Seferovic wrote: Does this have anything to do with the authentication method and AD ? I don't think so. Neither do I! We're not looking at AD yet. A colleague of mine tried to set it up for JRS by roughly copying someone else's configuration. It failed. So I reinstalled FreeRadius

Re: Shared secret is incorrect - but it is identical!

2007-07-04 Thread A . L . M . Buxey
Hi, I acan make ntlm_auth work from command line but not from FreeRadius yet - so I dropped it and am trying to ensure I can run a minimal test. permissions. make sure that /var/cache/samba/winbind_priviledged is owned by freeradius or the freeradius group. alan - List

Re: Shared secret is incorrect - but it is identical!

2007-07-04 Thread Alan DeKok
ken wrote: ... User-Password = \356za\360V\202oljug\263\025M!) (1) The shared secret is wrong (2) The code is buggy There are no alternatives. This is often due to broken MD5 libraries, or 32/64-bit issues. But FreeRADIUS hasn't had those kind of bugs for *years*. Alan

Shared secret is incorrect - but it is identical!

2007-07-03 Thread ken
I'm trying to get FreeRadius working on a Fedora Core 6 server with a view to eventually using it to authenticate against Windows Active Directory via ntlm_auth for the Janet Roaming Service. The first attempts at configuring it failed rather drastically so I went back to the beginning and I'm

RE: Shared secret is incorrect - but it is identical!

2007-07-03 Thread Josh Howlett
mailing list Subject: Shared secret is incorrect - but it is identical! I'm trying to get FreeRadius working on a Fedora Core 6 server with a view to eventually using it to authenticate against Windows Active Directory via ntlm_auth for the Janet Roaming Service. The first attempts

RE: Shared secret is incorrect - but it is identical!

2007-07-03 Thread Edvin Seferovic
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] g] On Behalf Of Josh Howlett Sent: Dienstag, 03. Juli 2007 23:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; FreeRadius users mailing list Cc: Josh Howlett Subject: RE: Shared secret is incorrect - but it is identical! Hi Ken, What happens if, using radtest, you specify the username *without