On 20/04/12 14:32, Thomas Fagart wrote:
Many thanks, we took Option 1 which is the most "embedded one" :-).
It works great, I didn't know we could change sql module use in another
part of the AAA process.
It's generic, and works on all modules, in all parts of the server; you
can call:
mod
Many thanks, we took Option 1 which is the most "embedded one" :-).
It works great, I didn't know we could change sql module use in another
part of the AAA process.
Thomas
On 20.04.2012 13:21, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 20/04/12 11:39, Thomas Fagart wrote:
When we use SQL module, in accounting
On 20/04/12 11:39, Thomas Fagart wrote:
When we use SQL module, in accounting part, it does insert accounting
information into the SQL, but does not request information from the
database. I know that I could change this SQL request in sql.conf (eg
SELECT instead of INSERT), but will it work ?
Hello,
We currently authenticate FTTH Subscribers with FreeRadius.
It works like that :
Subscriber --> DHCP Request --> NAS that does DHCP to Radius --> Access
Request --> Proxy Freeradius --> ISP Home server
In the Authentication/Autorization phases, The Freeradius Proxy gets
the ADSL-Age
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 6:54 AM, jared r r spiegel wrote:
> it seems like i want to use a "fallback" server in the home_server_pool,
> where that fallback server would just 'ok' accounting or otherwise toss it
> in the trash, but after a few iterations of trying to make this work
> i have come
there are a small number of cases where we would love it if we could just
/dev/null this proxy accounting if the remote server is dead/zombie,
however i haven't figured out a way to actually configure this.
it seems like i want to use a "fallback" server in the home_serv
Waqas Toor wrote:
> Thank you Alan for your support.
> I have one question now, in the realm part "test_cpe.com" I want to
> maintain this realm in the user name for accounting. for Example
> "MAC@test_cpe.com" it should not remove the suffix.
Read raddb/proxy.conf. This is documented. Read th
Thank you Alan for your support.
I have one question now, in the realm part "test_cpe.com" I want to
maintain this realm in the user name for accounting. for Example
"MAC@test_cpe.com" it should not remove the suffix.
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Alan DeKok wrote:
> Waqas Toor wrote:
>> Ahaan
Waqas Toor wrote:
> Ahaan, Ok below is an accounting packet and and its response
> also please tell me if the the lines that i get while in debug mode are
> normal ?
Yes, but...
> [suffix] Looking up realm "test_cpe.com" for User-Name =
> "002682D1A232@test_cpe.com"
> [suffix] No such realm "t
Ahaan, Ok below is an accounting packet and and its response
also please tell me if the the lines that i get while in debug mode are normal ?
Polling for detail file
/usr/local/var/log/radius/radacct/detail.example.com/detail-*:*
Detail listener
/usr/local/var/log/radius/radacct/detail.example.com
Waqas Toor wrote:
> Thank you Alan for you help,
> But please can you point out where I am wrong or a line may be which
> is a bad config, I am having trouble understanding why the packets are
> not being forwarded while being in site-enabled directory.
As I said, the debug log you posted shows
and virtual servers, treat me as a noob
Waqas
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Alan DeKok wrote:
> Waqas Toor wrote:
>>> Did you bother *reading* the "robust-proxy-accounting" file?
>>>
>> I have configured the robust-proxy-accounting
>
> That doesn&#
Waqas Toor wrote:
>> Did you bother *reading* the "robust-proxy-accounting" file?
>>
> I have configured the robust-proxy-accounting
That doesn't answer the question. The comments in that file describe
how it works. This includes answering your original quest
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Alan DeKok wrote:
> Waqas Toor wrote:
>> but what to do to get accounting to other client, Also if that fails
>> is it going to create detail files ?
>
> Did you bother *reading* the "robust-proxy-accounting" file?
>
Waqas Toor wrote:
> but what to do to get accounting to other client, Also if that fails
> is it going to create detail files ?
Did you bother *reading* the "robust-proxy-accounting" file?
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
packet to some other accounting listener server.
>> I couldn't make sense out of copy-acct-to-home-server that where I can
>> define the other accounting listening server.
>>
>> also if I use robust-proxy-accounting I am unable to understand the
>> pass-through acco
t; also if I use robust-proxy-accounting I am unable to understand the
> pass-through accounting, is it going to save to local accounting as
> well ?
Yes. The "accounting" section is run just like normal.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Hello Community,
I want to store accounting packets to local database and proxy same
accounting packet to some other accounting listener server.
I couldn't make sense out of copy-acct-to-home-server that where I can
define the other accounting listening server.
also if I use robust-
Emilio Inthamoussu wrote:
> We were looking for information about this particular issue, but we only
> found that when proxying the requests, a file (no the DB) is written.
>
> Somebody know how to do proxy and also save an entry in the local database?
At least in 2.1.x, you just configure "sql
Dear all,
We have a platform with freeRadius 1.1.4 (I know, it´s a bit old J). It is
connected to a MySQL database where the accounting requests are saved.
The freeRadius is configured to proxy the accounting requests of one
specific realm, but we also need that those accounting requests remain
09:38 AM
Subject: Proxy Accounting Records only to another MySQL Server
Sent by:freeradius-users-bounces
+eric.hernandez=allegiantair@lists.freeradius.org
Accounting methods
The following accounting logging methods are supported by the server
Local &
Accounting methods
The following accounting logging methods are supported by the server
Local 'detail' files
Local 'wtmp' and 'utmp' files
Proxy to another RADIUS server
Replicate to one or more RADIUS servers
SQL (Oracle, MySQL, PostgreSQL, Sybase, IODBC, etc)
fro
Jeremy Brown wrote:
> I'm trying to setup a FreeRadius server to act as a proxy for another
> DNS server, and this seems straightforward enough from the
> documentation, however I also want the FreeRadius proxy to send
> accounting information to another Radius server.
That's not very clear. Yo
Hi Everyone,
I'm trying to setup a FreeRadius server to act as a proxy for another
DNS server, and this seems straightforward enough from the
documentation, however I also want the FreeRadius proxy to send
accounting information to another Radius server.
I haven't seen any documentation on how to
rver.
> Response packet was received, was not firewalled or otherwise blocked.
>
> However, when I issue status requests to my freeradius server, it
> clearly claims there are zero proxy accounting responses.
>
> FreeRADIUS-Total-Proxy-Accounting-Requests = 2302
&g
, Value: 90
0x: 3930
Accounting request proxied to foreign server, Accounting response received
from foreign server.
Response packet was received, was not firewalled or otherwise blocked.
However, when I issue status requests to my freeradius server, it clearly
claims there are zero proxy
I'm also about to attempt the same thing, but this comment below
didn't make sense to me.
You put what in where?
Any chance you can copy-n-paste a clarification for those of us who're
also new to FreeRADIUS?
Thanks,
PhilP
> after debug i saw that all that was missing was in the default file und
> preacct the name of the realm.
> all works fine now.
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Proxy-Accounting-tp26090474p26099482.html
Sent from the FreeRadius - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
adia wrote:
> Dear All,
> We have FreeRADIUS Version 2.1.1 installed with mysql.
> Some of our users are authenticated via an external radius so we have
> configured a realm and proxy.
> All works well except accounting. The Freeradius does not seems to be
> sending the accounting to the remote ser
the radius.
Your help please.
Regards,
Adi.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Proxy-Accounting-tp26090474p26090474.html
Sent from the FreeRadius - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
> > Yes, this has also been my assumption and I've tried this but I've
> > failed in making both instances proxy the packet.
>
> So what does the debug log say?
>
> > There must be something I'm not getting because I don't see how I can
> > have two realms with one pool and home_server each
Dánial Olsen wrote:
> Yes, this has also been my assumption and I've tried this but I've failed
> in making both instances proxy the packet.
So what does the debug log say?
> There must be something I'm not getting because I don't see how I can
> have two realms with one pool and home_serv
-users-bounces+dol=ft...@lists.freeradius.org
[freeradius-users-bounces+dol=ft...@lists.freeradius.org] On Behalf Of Ivan
Kalik [...@kalik.net]
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 0:01
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: RE: How to proxy accounting requests to multiple destinations
> T
> This subject is misleading and should rather read: How to proxy an
> accounting request to the same destination twice
Why? What is home server supposed to do with the duplicate packet (that it
couldn't do with the first one)?
Ivan Kalik
Kalik Informatika ISP
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe?
s.org] On Behalf Of
Craig Campbell
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 11:28 PM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: How to proxy accounting requests to multiple destinations
I suspect you'll need to treat it like two unique servers, and create two
(2) copy-acct-to-home-server in
From: "Dánial Olsen"
To: "FreeRadius users mailing list"
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 6:12 PM
Subject: RE: How to proxy accounting requests to multiple destinations
Hi again,
This subject is misleading and should rather read: How to proxy an
accounting request to th
Hi again,
This subject is misleading and should rather read: How to proxy an accounting
request to the same destination twice
I've now also tried with robust-proxy-accounting but it only sends to one of
the home_servers.
Any advice or pointers in the right direction will be gr
Hi,
I'm running FreeRADIUS 2.1.6 on FreeBSD 7.2 and I need to proxy incoming radius
accounting requests to two different ports at the same destination ip. I'm
quite inexperienced with freeradius and I'm not sure I've understood completely
what I need to do.
I've set up realms, home_servers and
er RADIUS accounting message to my
> > billing server. Now my billing system will receive all accounting info
> for
> > all users.
> >
> > I would like to do billing record only for some of my users so that I
> > would
> > like to filter the others. I buil
built a freeradius 1.x to proxy accounting
> message from NAS devices to billing server.
Why not 2.x? It is much more flexible for such situations.
>
> Is it possible to configure the freeradius filter/limit the proxy of
> accounting message based on user in database or files?
Yes.
proxy accounting
message from NAS devices to billing server.
Is it possible to configure the freeradius filter/limit the proxy of
accounting message based on user in database or files?
Thanks,
HM
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Chris Howley wrote:
> I can confirm that the change made to the event.c file fixed the problem
> with the robust proxy accounting.
That's great news!
> Many thanks for you help.
And thanks for spending the time to not only debug it, but provide
useful feedback.
Alan DeKo
Alan & Ivan,
I can confirm that the change made to the event.c file fixed the problem
with the robust proxy accounting.
Many thanks for you help.
Chris
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Chris Howley wrote:
> This is the debug output using the latest release of 2.1.7 from
> http://git.freeradius.org/pre.
Arg. There was an idiotic typo in the code. I can't help but feel at
least partially responsible.
OK... I've put the updated version on the same web site. You don't
have
> Alan,
>
> This is the debug output using the latest release of 2.1.7 from
> http://git.freeradius.org/pre.
Hm, for some reason failure doesn'r result in retry in last pass:
...
> Found Post-Proxy-Type
> server home.example.com {
> +- entering group Fail {...}
> [detail.example.com] Suppressi
Alan,
This is the debug output using the latest release of 2.1.7 from
http://git.freeradius.org/pre.
Thanks for your help in advance.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Chris Howley [mailto:ecl...@netserv3.leeds.ac.uk]
Sent: 15 June 2009 12:07
To: Chris Howley
Subject: radius.debug4
endin
Chris Howley wrote:
> Here's the output from FR2.1.7.
OK. Please grab an updated copy of the 2.1.7 tar file from
http://git.freeradius.org/pre/
I've put some changes in which should help.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Alan,
Here's the output from FR2.1.7.
Thanks for you help in advance,
Chris
++[exec] returns noop
Sending Access-Accept of id 128 to 10.12.80.109 port 32769
User-Name = "isschug"
MS-MPPE-Recv-Key =
0x3019b4c8f9f76bb2fc4d69edbc20e98377351a661c0b412c760cd773e3b4c5f5
MS-M
Chris Howley wrote:
> I doubled the value of cleanup delay in radiusd.conf. This change didn't fix
> the problem (see below).
Grab a copy of the server from http://git.freeradius.org/pre/
I've added some debug messages which might help explain what's going on.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subs
Ivan,
I doubled the value of cleanup delay in radiusd.conf. This change didn't fix
the problem (see below).
Thanks for your help,
Chris
++[exec] returns noop
Sending Access-Accept of id 88 to 10.12.80.109 port 32769
User-Name = "isschug"
MS-MPPE-Recv-Key =
0x529e91a0004dce6a6b
> When both RADIUS servers are operational robust proxying works. When one
> of the servers is
> unreachable the other server (that's attempting to proxy an accounting
> request) will delete
> the detail.work file from the listener's sub-directory after failing to
> get a response from
> the other
Ivan,
When both RADIUS servers are operational robust proxying works. When one of the
servers is
unreachable the other server (that's attempting to proxy an accounting request)
will delete
the detail.work file from the listener's sub-directory after failing to get a
response from
the other serv
Chris Howley wrote:
> I used the example configuration and got the same result.
Well... it worked the last time I tried it, hence the example.
The goal is:
a) have a "fallback" configuration in the pool that writes packets to
the "detail" file
b) read from the detail file, and try to prox
> Thank you for your help. I've removed the configuration from the
> proxy.conf and I'm now using
> the original robust-proxy-accounting file. However, the problem persists -
> the detail.work
> file is being erased.
Which detail.work? Accounting one or failover o
Alan,
Thank you for your help. I've removed the configuration from the proxy.conf and
I'm now using
the original robust-proxy-accounting file. However, the problem persists - the
detail.work
file is being erased.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: freeradius-users-bounces+
Hi,
> I used the example configuration and got the same result.
.
> 2. I moved the following from the robust-proxy-accounting file to the
> proxy.conf file.
why?
the robust-accounting stuff is a self-contained virtual server. by putting
this into proxy.conf you have intro
tail file.++[detail.example.com] returns noop } # server
acct_detail.example.com Going to the next request <<< Received proxied response
from internal virtual server.
server home.example.com {
}
1) The following is in the robust-proxy-accounting file.
# (5) Define the virtual server to
Chris Howley wrote:
Sending proxied request internally to virtual server.
> server acct_detail.leeds.ac.uk {
> +- entering group accounting {...}
> [detail.leeds.ac.uk] Suppressing writes to detail file as the request was
> just read from a detail file.
> ++[detail.leeds.ac.uk] returns noop
>
Alan,
I hoping you can help me. We're currently testing FR2.1.6 and robust proxy
accounting.
We have two servers running FR2.1.6. When both servers are operational the
relaying of
accounting packets works. However, when one of the servers is down the other
operational
server fails to r
JDL wrote:
> In FreeRADIUS 2.x, the radrelay functions have been built into radiusd.
That's the intention.
> However, I seem to be having problems with data loss. Everything works
> fine when the remote accounting server is up. However, when it goes
> down, here is what I am seeing.
...
> 4) He
>> Since we started using buffered accounting there is an open session now
>> and then. Before, when we wrote directly to sql, no packets were lost,
>> so I have to assume it is coming from radrelay.
>
> Weird.
Oh, it was happening much more often in testing. Often enough for me to
notice. I woul
t...@kalik.net wrote:
> Since we started using buffered accounting there is an open session now
> and then. Before, when we wrote directly to sql, no packets were lost,
> so I have to assume it is coming from radrelay.
Weird.
> We will just start using checkrad. No need before - no dropped pack
Since we started using buffered accounting there is an open session now
and then. Before, when we wrote directly to sql, no packets were lost,
so I have to assume it is coming from radrelay.
It is totally random: no relation to load etc. I can't figure out any
reason. Server is self-build from mos
t...@kalik.net wrote:
> In my experience detail reader drops a packet once in about 50,000 reads.
Hmm... that's not good.
Any reason why?
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
>After short analisys I decided to use the configuration explained into the
>"copy-acct-to-home-server" file.
>I configured a virtual server polling on the detail file (I set the creation
>of one single detail file for every client connected) in order to ONLY
>forwards all the incoming accountin
freeradius-users-bounces+francesco.xb.toro=ericsson@lists.freeradius.org]
On Behalf Of Alan DeKok
Sent: venerdì 16 gennaio 2009 17.44
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: Static Proxy Accounting
Francesco Toro XB wrote:
> I guess if it's possible to set FreeRadius to
Francesco Toro XB wrote:
> I guess if it's possible to set FreeRadius to statically forward
> accounting request ( only Start, Stop and Interim ) still acting as
> Master Server,
Please don't use terms like "statically forward".
> i.e. without waiting for the Home Server respose before sending
Several options are explained in raddb/sites-available.
Ivan Kalik
Kalik Informatika ISP
Dana 16/1/2009, "Francesco Toro XB"
piše:
>Hi All,
>
>I'm evaluating FreeRadius Server for my Company. I'm very interested in
>a specific functionality, as explained in the mail subject.
>I guess if it's p
Hi All,
I'm evaluating FreeRadius Server for my Company. I'm very interested in
a specific functionality, as explained in the mail subject.
I guess if it's possible to set FreeRadius to statically forward
accounting request ( only Start, Stop and Interim ) still acting as
Master Server,
i.e. witho
Mailing List wrote:
> I want that my radius immediately responds to the NAS regardless the
> state of the home server. My radius does not have to wait for the
> response of the home server, it sends the ACK back
> immediately to the NAS.
You want to read raddb/sites-available/decoupled-accountin
Hi,
I want that my radius immediately responds to the NAS regardless the
state of the home server. My radius does not have to wait for the
response of the home server, it sends the ACK back
immediately to the NAS.
Regards,
Kurt
On 04 Aug 2008, at 05:47, Pshem Kowalczyk wrote:
Hi,
Well,
Hi,
Well, you have to clarify what you want to do - if you want your
radius server (A) to respond if the home server (B) is down or not.
But both scenarios are possible and can be achieved with freeradius.
kind regards
Pshem
2008/8/4 Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> I have freeradius
Hi,
I have freeradius (A) up and running that proxies accounting messages to
another freeradius (B) . Is it possible to configure (A) in such a way that
it
will always will acknowedge towards the NAS even when (B) is not responding
to an proxied accounting message coming from (A).
Now, If (B) is d
>No: they're each writing the accounting data to local files. No
>database there.
>
>> If that is so, you don't need to proxy accounting from one radius
>> server to the other - they already have a complete picture.
>> Just configure them both to proxy accoun
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Alan DeKok wrote:
I'm looking to have both of these systems proxy incoming accounting
data to each other, ...
That should be easy. See the "detail" file readers in
raddb/sites-available/copy-acct-to-home-server.
Ok. I've been looking in the right place for that.
I'
radacct table.
No: they're each writing the accounting data to local files. No
database there.
If that is so, you don't need to proxy accounting from one radius
server to the other - they already have a complete picture.
Just configure them both to proxy accounting to the NMS.
I
entication data for
your users. And that both are witing accounting data into the same
radacct table. If that is so, you don't need to proxy accounting from
one radius server to the other - they already have a complete picture.
Just configure them both to proxy accounting to the NMS.
Ivan Kalik
Ka
py-acct-to-home-server, raddb/proxy.conf, and
> the relevant parts of raddb/radiusd.conf, but I'm not sure I have yet
> understood whether what I want can be done: proxy accounting-request
> packets from both "production" RADIUS servers to each other AND to the
> wir
data).
I've been trying to understand the comments in
raddb/sites-available/copy-acct-to-home-server, raddb/proxy.conf, and
the relevant parts of raddb/radiusd.conf, but I'm not sure I have yet
understood whether what I want can be done: proxy accounting-request
packets from both "
How do you configure freeradius to receive accounting information from a proxy
radius server ? Is it possible to store this accounting information in a
different table in postgresql database?
Thanks
-
Choose the right car based on your needs. Check out
any suggestion on below..
--haizam
- Original Message -
From: "Rohaizam Abu Bakar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FreeRadius users mailing list"
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 2:26 PM
Subject: Proxy accounting after query LDAP
FR: freeradius-1.1.2
OD: FreeBSD
ge -
From: "Rohaizam Abu Bakar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FreeRadius users mailing list"
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 2:26 PM
Subject: Proxy accounting after query LDAP
FR: freeradius-1.1.2
OD: FreeBSD 6.0
trying to query LDAP for certain attribute.. if found,
FR: freeradius-1.1.2
OD: FreeBSD 6.0
trying to query LDAP for certain attribute.. if found, then proxy accounting
to other server if not store accounting locally.
trying using rlm_perl as below:-
i) radiusd.conf
perl y5perl {
module = /usr/local/etc/raddb/y5perl.pl
Title: Proxy accounting and Preproxy_useres
Hello guys/girls
I’m a new in this forum
And any help will be appriciate
Freeradius Version 1.1.0
I’m trying to use proxy accounting to a radius backend server
The proxy.conf file look like this and it works fine
realm DEFAULT
kevin wrote:
> I want to make an option not to proxy accounting but log locally.
> What option can I take? Should I make a preproxy code for this function?
Remove any instance of the module "realm" (it's named "suffix" in the
default config file) from the
I want to make an option not to proxy accounting but log locally.
What option can I take? Should I make a preproxy code for this function?
In proxy.conf, you define where to send the accounting packets.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
I want to make an option not to proxy accounting but log locally.
What option can I take? Should I make a preproxy code for this function?
Kevin
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 12:18:37 +0200
> From: "Ashwin Gobind" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Proxy of Accounting Requests
> To:
> Message-ID:
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-asci
ED]>
Subject: Re: Proxy of Accounting Requests
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Ashwin Gobind wrote:
> I want to proxy accounting requests originating from certain hosts to
> another server, how can I do this.
Hi,
my FR is acting as proxy server. What I need to do is next:
- when I get accounting from router i need to cut some things of
(Acct-Session-Id)
How can I do this with FR?
Thank you
http://www.email.si/
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/lis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My freeradius version is 0.9-pre.
Why? Use 1.0.1. Odds are the problem you're seeing has been fixed.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
I have a problem with the proxy accounting feature.
I set the proxy.conf with a couple of radius servers with the same realm name.
For the authentication the proxy works fine, but with the proxy accounting not.
I received in the error log "...arrived too late for request..." , a
On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 11:10 -0400, Alan DeKok wrote:
> Stephan Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But it's not possible to get only one detail file with the local
> > tickets?
>
> Yes. You can set Acct-Type for the non-proxied requests, and have a
> sub-section of accounting{}, with that Acc
Stephan Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But it's not possible to get only one detail file with the local
> tickets?
Yes. You can set Acct-Type for the non-proxied requests, and have a
sub-section of accounting{}, with that Acct-Type, and put "detail"
inside of it.
Alan DeKok.
-
List in
Hi,
thanks, for your fast answer.
On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 10:29 -0400, Alan DeKok wrote:
> Stephan Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i'm having a proxy problem with newer freeradius versions. While 0.9.2
> > as a proxy send an accounting response for a request which wasn't to be
> > proxied a
Stephan Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'm having a proxy problem with newer freeradius versions. While 0.9.2
> as a proxy send an accounting response for a request which wasn't to be
> proxied and with an empty accounting section (in radiusd.conf), newer
> versions at least everything >= s
Hi,
i'm having a proxy problem with newer freeradius versions. While 0.9.2
as a proxy send an accounting response for a request which wasn't to be
proxied and with an empty accounting section (in radiusd.conf), newer
versions at least everything >= snapshot 2004/21/06 and <= 1.0.1 just
ignore t
Hi,
I need to proxy the accounting on/off packets, but the proxy server ignore
them:
Thread 5 handling request 34, (7 handled so
far)
NAS-IP-Address =
192.168.155.2
Acct-Status-Type =
Accounting-On
Acct-Session-Id =
"0001"
Acct-Delay-Time =
10
m
98 matches
Mail list logo
