Re: radwho not working

Clint Petty wrote: > Hi Alan, > > Well I discovered a way to display a list of all active users without having > to implement FreeRadius accounting, which BTW is not as straight forward as > it should be. > > I was able to display all active users through my StrongSwan server, with the > simpl

Re: radwho not working

On 7 Oct 2013, at 22:39, Clint Petty wrote: > Hi Alan, > > Well I discovered a way to display a list of all active users without having > to implement FreeRadius accounting, which BTW is not as straight forward as > it should be. > > I was able to display all active users through my StrongSw

RE: radwho not working

:10 PM To: FreeRadius users mailing list Subject: Re: radwho not working Clint Petty wrote: > I am not blaming, I am just wanting to get the radwho command to work. That is *entirely* the wrong attitude. There is no "just get it to work". There *are* multiple pieces involved, each

Re: radwho not working

%{User-Name} -> test > ++[radutmp] returns ok > ++[exec] returns noop >From that, have you tried the following? radwho -F /var/log/radius/radutmp See also radwho(1). Matthew -- Matthew Newton, Ph.D. Systems Specialist, Infrastructure Services, I.T. Services, University of Lei

Re: radwho not working

Clint Petty wrote: > I am not blaming, I am just wanting to get the radwho command to work. That is *entirely* the wrong attitude. There is no "just get it to work". There *are* multiple pieces involved, each of which has to be verified. I'm trying to convince you t

RE: radwho not working

onse] returns updated Sending Accounting-Response of id 95 to xx.xx.xx.79 port 48595 Finished request 2. Cleaning up request 2 ID 95 with timestamp +9 Going to the next request Waking up in 4.8 seconds. Cleaning up request 0 ID 93 with timestamp +9 Cleaning up request 1 ID 94 with timestamp +9 Ready t

Re: radwho not working

Hi, > I am not blaming, I am just wanting to get the radwho command to work. I > have now turned on accounting info to be sent from the StrongSwan server to > the FreeRadius server. For I can see the accounting info in > /var/log/radius/radacct//detail-20131003 file. However I

RE: radwho not working

Hi Alan, I am not blaming, I am just wanting to get the radwho command to work. I have now turned on accounting info to be sent from the StrongSwan server to the FreeRadius server. For I can see the accounting info in /var/log/radius/radacct//detail-20131003 file. However I am still

Re: radwho not working

Clint Petty wrote: > Below is the results from radiusd -X (debug mode), while logging in: > > rad_recv: Access-Request packet from host xx.xx.xx.79 port 40379, id=79, > length=138 The radwho file logs *accounting* packets. That is an *authentication* packet. You're b

RE: radwho not working

mestamp +20 Ready to process requests. -Original Message- From: freeradius-users-bounces+me=company....@lists.freeradius.org [mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+me=company@lists.freeradius.org] On Behalf Of a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 1:32 AM To: FreeRadius

Re: radwho not working

Hi, > I would like to display the active Radius connections. When I run radwho I > get the following results (showing nothing but the titles) even though I know > I have an active connection: using the utmp/wtmp modules? what does your FreeRADIUS debug show when someone logging

radwho not working

I would like to display the active Radius connections. When I run radwho I get the following results (showing nothing but the titles) even though I know I have an active connection: # radwho Login Name What TTY When FromLocation # - List info/subscribe

Re: Radwho doesn't show full name

Hello, Could you please check and confirm whether it works for you in freeradius 2? Best regards Marek Dnia 5 kwietnia 2013 0:47 mkeram <mke...@o2.pl> napisał(a): Hello, I have installed Debian Squeeze 6.0 with freeradius 2.1.10 + accel-ppp (PPPoE). Everything is working fine, but radw

Radwho doesn't show full name

Hello, I have installed Debian Squeeze 6.0 with freeradius 2.1.10 + accel-ppp (PPPoE). Everything is working fine, but radwho and radwho -s doesn't return full username fetched from /etc/passwd. All users have real linux account and proper entry in /etc/freeradius/users. All details logi

Question about radwho/radutmp dates

Hi folks, How long time does radwho/radutmp store accounting information? Thanks in advance -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list

radlast and radwho commands

I have a problem on the freeradius. When I was using this commands "radwho" and "radlast" it shows "still login" but some users doesnt connect. what is wrong , ı dont understand. Sorry for my bad english. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Re: radwho: No configuration information in radutmp section of radiusd.conf

On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Angel L. Mateo wrote: > Same configuration, with freeradius 2.2.0 but using radwho from > 2.1.8 works. Instead of revert patching the file, I have copied radwho > command from previous folders, and it works without any problem. > > S

Re: radwho: No configuration information in radutmp section of radiusd.conf

El 19/11/12 09:15, Fajar A. Nugraha escribió: On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Angel L. Mateo wrote: accounting { detail unix #radutmp Well, that won't help. You're trying to use "radwho", but aren't logging accounting information. That

Re: radwho: No configuration information in radutmp section of radiusd.conf

On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Angel L. Mateo wrote: >>> accounting { >>> detail >>> unix >>> #radutmp >> >> >>Well, that won't help. >> >>You're trying to use "radwho", but aren&

Re: radwho: No configuration information in radutmp section of radiusd.conf

El 16/11/12 17:03, Alan DeKok escribió: Angel L. Mateo wrote: Hello, I have a problem with radwho since I upgraded from 2.1.10 to 2.2.0. The same configuration (I'm trying now the default configuration installed from ubuntu packages) works with version 2.1.10 and not with 2.2.0. The

Re: radwho: No configuration information in radutmp section of radiusd.conf

Angel L. Mateo wrote: > Hello, > > I have a problem with radwho since I upgraded from 2.1.10 to 2.2.0. > The same configuration (I'm trying now the default configuration > installed from ubuntu packages) works with version 2.1.10 and not with > 2.2.0. The error I

radwho: No configuration information in radutmp section of radiusd.conf

Hello, I have a problem with radwho since I upgraded from 2.1.10 to 2.2.0. The same configuration (I'm trying now the default configuration installed from ubuntu packages) works with version 2.1.10 and not with 2.2.0. The error I get is; radwho: No configuration information in ra

Re: radwho with nas-ip-address behind NAT

that I am doing something wrong... > > Packet-Src-IP-Address, on the other hand, is whatever the radius sees > the packet coming from, which should be the NAS/firewal's public IP > address in your case. > > -- > Fajar > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Sergio Belkin

Re: radwho with nas-ip-address behind NAT

your case. -- Fajar On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder radwho can show the "actual" Nas-IP-Address os  and not the > Nat device IP nat. Another interesting option would be NAS-Identifier. > Is that feasible? - List info/subscribe/unsubsc

radwho with nas-ip-address behind NAT

Hi, I wonder radwho can show the "actual" Nas-IP-Address os and not the Nat device IP nat. Another interesting option would be NAS-Identifier. Is that feasible? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certif

Re: radwho

Luo, Frank Y.F. Mr. wrote: > I have noticed that radwho command only return one entry at any time but > obviously there are more than one people logged in > > $ sudo radwho > Login Name What TTY When FromLocation > d0c1b122dc d0c1b122dc75

radwho

I have noticed that radwho command only return one entry at any time but obviously there are more than one people logged in $ sudo radwho Login Name What TTY When FromLocation d0c1b122dc d0c1b122dc75 shell S29 Fri 11:43 172.18.47.242 172.24.192.42

Re: Accessing radwho information or accounting request from rlm_perl

eluna wrote: > As you can see the NAS-IP-Address attributes are different, and I need a > method to get the value of the accounting request because when I need to for > example deauthenticate a user, i need to know what access point is is > actually associated to. Any solutions or hints are very mu

Accessing radwho information or accounting request from rlm_perl

ed to for example deauthenticate a user, i need to know what access point is is actually associated to. Any solutions or hints are very much appreciated. -- View this message in context: http://freeradius.1045715.n5.nabble.com/Accessing-radwho-information-or-accounting-request-from-rlm-perl-tp5695393.ht

Re: radwho

On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Fazal Ahmed Malik wrote: > Is there any script or utility which can clean up radwho. radzap? Personally I just remove all reference to *radutmp in sites-available/* since I don't use it anyway. > 2ndly how can I > disconnect connected users by fo

RE: radwho

Hi, I have freeradius installed with mpd for pppoe dialin users. If some users power off computer without disconnecting than session hangs up. When I run radwho it shows user is connected where as practically user is disconnected. Is there any script or utility which can clean up radwho. 2ndly

A lot of users connected with radwho

Hello everybody, I have a freeradius that autenticate users using mysql database. When I use the command radwho I saw a lot of users wich are old users. The question is, How should I disconnect those users so don't showed up with the radwho command? Regards C

Re: radwho once again

Mateusz Pałosz wrote: > On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:28:04 -0200, somebody ask about radwho. > > server:~# radwho > radwho: Error reading /var/log/freeradius/sradutmp: No such file or directory > > Answer was to uncomment sradutmp in accounting section. But I want to > know, h

radwho once again

On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:28:04 -0200, somebody ask about radwho. server:~# radwho radwho: Error reading /var/log/freeradius/sradutmp: No such file or directory Answer was to uncomment sradutmp in accounting section. But I want to know, how to force radwho to read from existing /var/log/freeradius

Re: radwho with exact match not happening

djadav wrote: > when we give radwho -R -u it will give all user that match name. > but i want to grep an exact match. > > For, Example, abc, abc1, abc123,abc1264 user is connected. > Now when i give radwho -R -u abc > > then it will give all user connected with ab

radwho with exact match not happening

Dear All, I have configured a radius, its working fine, i am not get proper output in radwho commnad. when we give radwho -R -u it will give all user that match name. but i want to grep an exact match. For, Example, abc, abc1, abc123,abc1264 user is connected. Now when i give radwho -R -u

Re: radwho shows only the last user logged.

Hi, >ok, how would that be? how do I not use the freeradius NAS-Port as the >key? > >acct_unique is a module? > >acct_unique { >��� key = "User-Name, Acct-Session-Id, NAS-IP-Address, Client-IP-Address, >NAS-Port" >} > >I just remove the the NAS-Port-up of the keys

Re: radwho shows only the last user logged.

ok, how would that be? how do I not use the freeradius NAS-Port as the key? acct_unique is a module? acct_unique { key = "User-Name, Acct-Session-Id, NAS-IP-Address, Client-IP-Address, NAS-Port" } I just remove the the NAS-Port-up of the keys? John 2011/3/25 Alan Buxey > Hi, > > > > Act

Re: radwho shows only the last user logged.

ok, how would that be? how do I not use the freeradius NAS-Port as the key? acct_unique is a module? acct_unique { key = "User-Name, Acct-Session-Id, NAS-IP-Address, Client-IP-Address, NAS-Port" } I just remove the the NAS-Port-up of the keys? John 2011/3/25 Alan Buxey > Hi, > > > > Actu

Re: radwho shows only the last user logged.

Hi, > > Actually my NAS is sending the same port for all my users, but the door > > that she is sending is "NAS-Port = 29". > > So your NAS is broken. I don't know why people do that... Hello Cisco! :-) > Don't use radutmp. Instead, store the sessions in SQL, and edit the > SQL configura

Re: radwho shows only the last user logged.

My NAS is cisco is a wireless controller. Any suggestions for settings? And I'm also keeping my sessions in SQL. Att. 2011/3/25 Alan DeKok > joao...@gmail.com wrote: > > Actually my NAS is sending the same port for all my users, but the door > > that she is sending is "NAS-Port = 29". > > S

Re: radwho shows only the last user logged.

joao...@gmail.com wrote: > Actually my NAS is sending the same port for all my users, but the door > that she is sending is "NAS-Port = 29". So your NAS is broken. I don't know why people do that... > How can I configure it? > > is the radius or the NAS? The NAS. Read the NAS documentatio

Re: radwho shows only the last user logged.

ail.com wrote: > > But when I try to check the server how many users are logged via the > > command radwho, it returns me only the last user who logged in, I think > > he should show everyone who is authenticated at this point right?? > > Your NAS is sending "NAS-Port

Re: radwho shows only the last user logged.

joao...@gmail.com wrote: > But when I try to check the server how many users are logged via the > command radwho, it returns me only the last user who logged in, I think > he should show everyone who is authenticated at this point right?? Your NAS is sending "NAS-Port = 0" f

radwho shows only the last user logged.

r how many users are logged via the command radwho, it returns me only the last user who logged in, I think he should show everyone who is authenticated at this point right?? Regards. John -- João Paulo de Lima Barbosa Fone: (45) 9938-8399 Blog: http://joao.us Twitter: @joaocdc "O erro d

RE: radwho and radtest

NAS-Port. Ivan Kalik > > > >> Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:28:49 + >> Subject: RE: radwho and radtest >> From: t...@kalik.net >> To: rabdal...@pobox.com; freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org >> >> > >> > I get this when I login to the fire

Re: radwho and radtest

Please do the rest of us a favor and configure your mail client to use the correct data type when attaching files. Your log file came through as: Content-Type: application/octet-stream Which means mail clients think this is binary data and won't display it nor do they even know they can open

RE: radwho and radtest

hello Ivan attached is the complete debug log > Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:28:49 + > Subject: RE: radwho and radtest > From: t...@kalik.net > To: rabdal...@pobox.com; freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org > > > > > I get this when I login to the firewall > &

RE: radwho and radtest

> > I get this when I login to the firewall It would help if you wouldn't edit the debug. Post the whole thing request + processing (both for authentication and accounting). Ivan Kalik - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

RE: radwho and radtest

I get this when I login to the firewall > To: rabdal...@pobox.com; freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org > Subject: Re: radwho and radtest > From: g...@gera.me > Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 15:28:30 -0700 > > > Maybe I'm missing something, but is this shown while you do

Re: radwho and radtest

Maybe I'm missing something, but is this shown while you do use the radtest command? If so, then it's normal that you get nothing on radwho. If you get nothing on radwho when using the NAS (and you didn't went so far from the default freeradius configuration), then indeed yo

RE: radwho and radtest

great, then I have to contact the fortinet guys to see why this is happening > Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 22:08:56 + > Subject: RE: radwho and radtest > From: t...@kalik.net > To: rabdal...@pobox.com; freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org > > > [acct_unique] WARNING: Attri

RE: radwho and radtest

> [acct_unique] WARNING: Attribute NAS-Port was not found in request, unique > ID MAY be inconsistent ... > rlm_radutmp: No NAS-Port seen. Cannot do anything. Nothing misterious in those messages. NAS is not sending NAS-Port and radutmp needs it to work. Ivan Kalik - List info/subscribe/unsub

RE: radwho and radtest

noop ++[files] returns noop [radutmp] expand: /var/log/radius/radutmp -> /var/log/radius/radutmp [radutmp] expand: %{User-Name} -> rsa rlm_radutmp: No NAS-Port seen. Cannot do anything. rlm_radumtp: WARNING: checkrad will probably not work! ++[radutmp] returns noop > D

RE: radwho and radtest

> thank you alan for the quick reply. It worked just fine. Now I am still > facing the problem with the radwho and radlast. Any idea Yes, you have sent an authentication request. No accounting. So there is nothing for radwho to show. It displays accounting information. In case you weren&#

Re: radwho and radtest

hi, got accounting details sent from NAS? why dont you run in debug mode when you are doing the tests? you can then see what is going on...and why things arent being recorded. what method of session tracking are you using? radutmp etc - check your config for the session information. alan - Lis

RE: radwho and radtest

Thank you gera, attached are copies for the users and clients.conf config files. Normally when I run radwho and radlast I am authenticated with user rsa so I should at least see my login :) Regards, Ramzi > To: rabdal...@pobox.com; freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org > Subject: Re:

Re: radwho and radtest

A copy of the relevant parts of your users and clients config files would be great. If no body's logged in, it's fine if you see nothing on the radwho output On Wednesday 09 December 2009 12:41:48 pm Ramzi Abdallah wrote: > hi, > > I installed FreeRADIUS Version 2.1.7 f

RE: radwho and radtest

thank you alan for the quick reply. It worked just fine. Now I am still facing the problem with the radwho and radlast. Any idea Regards, Ramzi > Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 20:00:29 + > From: a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk > To: rabdal...@pobox.com; freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org

Re: radwho and radtest

ihi, accoridng to your output, it looks like localhost is mapping to ::1 which is the local box IPv6 address (like 127.0.0.1 is in IPv4 world) by default, FreeRADIUS wont be listing to IPv6 interface...if you configure it so that it is then this will work - otherwise change you command to eg

radwho and radtest

NAS-Port = 1812 radclient: no response from server for ID 42 socket 3 [r...@dia ~]# output of radwho - [r...@dia raddb]# radwho Login Name What TTY When FromLocation [r...@dia raddb]# [r...@dia ~]# radwatch A radiusd process already exist

radwho doesn't work

Hi all, Systems: CentOs v5.3, FreeRadius-server-2.1.6 + Openldap I d like to know who are logged on(uid, duration ...) so I did radwho but it said that the radutmp file is not found ... radwho

Re: radwho and location

> I've just started with FreeRADIUS and noticed that when running radwho the > 'location' field seems empty. > (FreeRADIUS 2.1.7 from the source on Ubuntu 8.04LTS) > > There doesn't seem to be a configuration option/tweak anywhere I can find, > or am I missing

radwho and location

Hi All, I've just started with FreeRADIUS and noticed that when running radwho the 'location' field seems empty. (FreeRADIUS 2.1.7 from the source on Ubuntu 8.04LTS) There doesn't seem to be a configuration option/tweak anywhere I can find, or am I missing something? The r

radwho error: Is this minor typo error in rpm packaging?

Hi, I have rpm based freeradius package installed in my CentOS 5.3 box. In the course of experimentation, I noticed that radwho gives me following error: == "/var/log/radius/sradutmp: No such file or directory" == I guess this is a minor typo error in rpm package.

Re: radwho

: > > >> Hi, >> >> I've just installed Freeradius 2.1.3 on a Debian Lenny, but I'm getting >> the following error with radwho: >> >> server:~# radwho >> radwho: Error reading /var/log/freeradius/sradutmp: No such file or >> directory

Re: radwho

Uncomment sradutmp in accounting section of the virtual server you are using (probably default) for accounting. Ivan Kalik Kalik Informatika ISP Dana 15/12/2008, "rgreiner" piše: >Hi, > >I've just installed Freeradius 2.1.3 on a Debian Lenny, but I'm getting >

radwho

Hi, I've just installed Freeradius 2.1.3 on a Debian Lenny, but I'm getting the following error with radwho: server:~# radwho radwho: Error reading /var/log/freeradius/sradutmp: No such file or directory Radlast works. There is no sradutmp, but there is a radutmp file. How do I set

SQL radwho radsqlwho

Here's what I'm using. It very likely will not work out-of-the-box on a stock freeradius, and it's PostgreSQL-specific. #!/usr/local/bin/perl # use Time::Local; use DBI; use Getopt::Std; $SQL_HOST="pgsql.example.com"; getopts('ah'); if ($opt_h) { print STDERR

Re: Simultaneous-Use and radwho

Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > Ok, wasn't aware of the functionality. I don't see a "radsneeze", > so I'm guessing you pipe them back in via echoing it to radclient? Yes. > I'd love to help, but I'm a "C compiler" (I can find includes/functions > and missing libraries) and not a "C prog

Re: Simultaneous-Use and radwho

> Copy the configs to a test machine. Run "radsniff" on the production > machine to grab packets. Play them back on the test machine. Run > radiusd -X on the test machine. > Ok, wasn't aware of the functionality. I don't see a "radsneeze", so I'm guessing you pipe them back in via echo

Re: Simultaneous-Use and radwho

Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > I haven't been given authorization to do a radiusd -X yet, Copy the configs to a test machine. Run "radsniff" on the production machine to grab packets. Play them back on the test machine. Run radiusd -X on the test machine. > But it seems somehow they

Simultaneous-Use and radwho

Hi, I haven't been given authorization to do a radiusd -X yet, but I'm seeing something in my logs that I don't get . User is logging in from multiple times, so I put on Simultaneous-Use and it goes against the radutmp. So I test it by hand and I get in radius.log Wed Jun 11 17:30:45 2008

Re: radwho radzap problem

Oguzhan Kayhan wrote: > Hello, > I am using rlm_perl script for authentication. And logging radacct in sql. > But it is strange that, > i couldnt use radwho radzap radlast etc for a while.. had the error "file > not found" etc.. > So i manually created the files with

Re: radwho radzap problem

Hi again, I think i found a solution I dont know why but i had to give -d parameter to show the default config path, my config path is under freeradius but it searches for radiusd so..it made the problem. So is there a way to change default path for radzap/radwho etc? > Hello, > I am

radwho radzap problem

Hello, I am using rlm_perl script for authentication. And logging radacct in sql. But it is strange that, i couldnt use radwho radzap radlast etc for a while.. had the error "file not found" etc.. So i manually created the files with touch. Now i can see theres records inside files, b

Re: About radwho

Patrice Oliver wrote: > when I use the radwho command, I get : > radwho: Error reading /usr/local/var/log/radius/radutmp: No such file or > directory radutmp is created from accounting packets. The accounting packets need to have the correct information. Run the server in debuggin

About radwho

Hello, I run freeradius 1.1.7. when I use the radwho command, I get : radwho: Error reading /usr/local/var/log/radius/radutmp: No such file or directory I looked in /usr/local/var/log/radius/ and didn't find radutmp file. I didn't read in the documentation that this file is to

Re: radwho does not show me any user

-Original Message- From: Alan DeKok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: FreeRadius users mailing list Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 11:04:35 +0100 Subject: Re: radwho does not show me any user > OLIVER Patrice wrote: > > When I use the radwho utility to know actually connected radius users.

Re: radwho does not show me any user

OLIVER Patrice wrote: > When I use the radwho utility to know actually connected radius users. > It returns me an empty list since I'm actually connected and authenticated. Your NAS is not sending accounting packets. They are needed in order to create and update the database use

radwho does not show me any user

Hello, When I use the radwho utility to know actually connected radius users. It returns me an empty list since I'm actually connected and authenticated. Yesterday, I saw that the radutmp file did not exist. So I created it with 600 permissions. The radiusd.conf has been setup like

Re: Problems With Radwho

>> >>> Are you getting accounting packets from those access servers? Or just >>> authentication? If nAS is not sending ... >>> >>> Ivan Kalik >>> Kalik Informatika ISP >>> >>> >>> Dana 16/11/2007, "Wille

Re: Problems With Radwho

ess servers? Or just > authentication? If nAS is not sending ... > > Ivan Kalik > Kalik Informatika ISP > > > Dana 16/11/2007, "Willem Gerber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> piše: > > >> Hi Guys/Gals >> >> I have problem where radwho only shows users l

Re: Problems With Radwho

ackets from those access servers? Or just >> authentication? If nAS is not sending ... >> >> Ivan Kalik >> Kalik Informatika ISP >> >> >> Dana 16/11/2007, "Willem Gerber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> piše: >> >> >>> Hi Guys/Gals >&

Re: Problems With Radwho

Are you getting accounting packets from those access servers? Or just authentication? If nAS is not sending ... Ivan Kalik Kalik Informatika ISP Dana 16/11/2007, "Willem Gerber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> piše: >Hi Guys/Gals > >I have problem where radwho only shows users

Problems With Radwho

Hi Guys/Gals I have problem where radwho only shows users logged in for two nas'es. Aswell as only their accounting info goes into the radacct table. I can see the other users authenticating and i can log into them. So they must be dailing up No idea why its happening. Im using ra

Re: radwho question....

Hi Thanx for your help. Its working now. I did have the files module commented out in the authorize sectionapologies. Thanx again. Chris. On 04/10/2007, Alan DeKok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chris Bradshaw wrote: > > OKI tried using a User-Name of Bob as suggested, > > Maybe.

Re: radwho question....

Chris Bradshaw wrote: > OKI tried using a User-Name of Bob as suggested, Maybe. The debug log you posted is either NOT the full debug log (-X). OR, you have deleted all references to the "files" module from radiusd.conf. If you tell the server to NOT look at the "users" file, then do

Re: radwho question....

Hi OKI tried using a User-Name of Bob as suggested, but still no joy. I have attached a complete log of everything from the moment I click OK on my Windoze laptop until the laptop says it has authenticated successfully.. Thanx in advance for any help. Chris. rad_recv: Access-Request

Re: radwho question....

Chris Bradshaw wrote: > The debug output was pretty much the same as my first email. I have > attached it below anyway. This debug output was taken with freeradius > 1.1.7 and the following configured: > > * Enabled use_tunneled_reply & copy_request_to_tunnel. > > * Have the following in the user

Re: radwho question....

Acct-Delay-Time = 0 >rlm_sql (sql): Reserving sql socket id: 2 >rlm_sql (sql): Released sql socket id: 2 > > > >On 03/10/2007, Alan DeKok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Chris Bradshaw wrote: >> > However, I have tried the suggestions in this reply: >>

Re: radwho question....

; > > > * Enable use_tunneled_reply & copy_request_to_tunnel (I already had > > these enabled). > > > > * Have the following in the users file: > > DEFAULT FreeRADIUS-Proxied-To == 127.0.0.1 > > User-Name := `%{User-Name}` > > And... what

Re: radwho question....

User-Name := `%{User-Name}` And... what do you see in the Access-Accept when you run in debugging mode? > but it still makes no difference.radwho still returns > 'anonymous' whenever I log in. Stop looking at radwho. It's output is WAY down the chain of cause and e

Re: radwho question....

tions in this reply: * Enable use_tunneled_reply & copy_request_to_tunnel (I already had these enabled). * Have the following in the users file: DEFAULT FreeRADIUS-Proxied-To == 127.0.0.1 User-Name := `%{User-Name}` but it still makes no difference.....radwho still returns &

Re: radwho question....

Chris Bradshaw wrote: > Thanx for the reply. I do have 'use_tunneled_reply = yes' in eap.conf, > but I am still seeing the outer identity showing up when I use radwho. As I said, you also have to send the inner tunnel name back in the Access-Accept. ... > Sending Acces

Re: radwho question....

Hi. Thanx for the reply. I do have 'use_tunneled_reply = yes' in eap.conf, but I am still seeing the outer identity showing up when I use radwho. I have run radiusd -A -x and have appended the Access-Accept section to this email. The first line of the log shows the inner identity

Re: radwho question....

Chris Bradshaw wrote: > I am using freeradius 1.0.1 on a Red Hat Ent Linux v4 server as an > authentication backend for our wireless network. You really should upgrade, but that's another story. > I have noticed that if I run radwho, I seem to only see the name of > the user

radwho question....

Hi I am using freeradius 1.0.1 on a Red Hat Ent Linux v4 server as an authentication backend for our wireless network. Our wireless clients all use EAP/TTLS (via the SecureW2 client) and the access points are Cisco Aironet 1200's. I have noticed that if I run radwho, I seem to only se

RE: no session showed by radwho, but user still could not login

hats wrong with that my conf ? > > >Trio > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 3:02 AM >To: FreeRadius users mailing list >Subject: RE: no session showed by radwh

RE: no session showed by radwho, but user still could not login

to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 3:02 AM To: FreeRadius users mailing list Subject: RE: no session showed by radwho, but user still could not login Yes. You haven't set up session control properly. Check the nastype entry in clents.conf and make su

  1   2   >