<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, but say I want to use radlast (which I do) -
> Could the size of radwtmp be the problem I am having with accurate
> results from radlast?
No. radlast will only show what's in radwtmp, and radwtmp is only
as accurate as the accounting packets the NAS sends.
Al
Ok, but say I want to use radlast (which I do) -
Could the size of radwtmp be the problem I am having with accurate
results from radlast?
How can I fix this? Can I log-rotate, reboot the machine?
Thanks
Ryan
---
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am w
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am wondering if these are related... and if we can just delete
> radwtmp and still have accurate logging. Is their a resource that
> describes how this is used?
The only purpose of radwtmp is radlast. If you're not using
radlast, delete radwtmp.
Alan DeKok.
-
Hey guys, sorry if this has been answered before, but I have a logging
type question.
I have a machine that has been up for 81 days, and the radwtmp file is
a whopping 659 megs. This wouldn't concern me if we didn't frequently
use radwho to see if a user is logged in. I believe the data from
radw
4 matches
Mail list logo