Re: radwtmp question

2004-10-13 Thread Alan DeKok
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, but say I want to use radlast (which I do) - > Could the size of radwtmp be the problem I am having with accurate > results from radlast? No. radlast will only show what's in radwtmp, and radwtmp is only as accurate as the accounting packets the NAS sends. Al

Re: radwtmp question

2004-10-13 Thread ryanl
Ok, but say I want to use radlast (which I do) - Could the size of radwtmp be the problem I am having with accurate results from radlast? How can I fix this? Can I log-rotate, reboot the machine? Thanks Ryan --- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am w

Re: radwtmp question

2004-10-13 Thread Alan DeKok
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am wondering if these are related... and if we can just delete > radwtmp and still have accurate logging. Is their a resource that > describes how this is used? The only purpose of radwtmp is radlast. If you're not using radlast, delete radwtmp. Alan DeKok. -

radwtmp question

2004-10-12 Thread ryanl
Hey guys, sorry if this has been answered before, but I have a logging type question. I have a machine that has been up for 81 days, and the radwtmp file is a whopping 659 megs. This wouldn't concern me if we didn't frequently use radwho to see if a user is logged in. I believe the data from radw