Re: [rad] Re: rlm_exec wiki

2009-06-16 Thread Charles Gregory
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote: it would be much beter if there was a full delineation between 1.x and 2.x docs - the web is full of older resources that dont say what version their tweaks and info is good for. (nod) I don't know enough about the differences between 1.x and

Re: rlm_exec wiki

2009-06-15 Thread Charles Gregory
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote: I think the initial idea would be to document what/how you've used exec module to define an attribute - rlm_exec is quite bare on the wiki ;-) Uh, yeah, almost forgot, that was actually one of the places I looked before I posted on the

Re: rlm_exec wiki

2009-06-15 Thread A . L . M . Buxey
Hi, (grin), but of course, if I want to write for the wiki, I'm going to have to install the latest release, to be sure what I write is valid for the most current context. Fortunately I have a test box for stuff like this. :) ..but to mirror wat you've ben saying - why not support 1.x

Re: rlm_exec wiki

2009-06-15 Thread Doug Hardie
On 15 June 2009, at 14:41, a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote: Hi, (grin), but of course, if I want to write for the wiki, I'm going to have to install the latest release, to be sure what I write is valid for the most current context. Fortunately I have a test box for stuff like this. :)