sure, if you put it on the filedrop I'll try to take a look. Why did you
smooth the volume? That might be the source of our trouble with it
cheers,
Bruce
On Mon, 7 Apr
2008, Jamie Hanson wrote:
Hi Jamie,
it's impossible to judge surface accuracy from one slice. You need to move
forwards an
Hi Jamie,
it's impossible to judge surface accuracy from one slice. You need to move
forwards and back a couple of slices to see if the surface is curving
sharply out of plane.
Can you explain a bit more about what is unique about this volume? I
didn't really understand from your email. Is
Hi Jared,
10-30% is not that much if you are using different versions and looking
at small structures (e.g. amygdala or entorhinal cortex). Why are you
using different versions? That's definitely something to be avoided.
cheers,
Bruce
On Mon,
7 Apr 2008, Jared Morton wrote:
I am using Fre
Your interpretation of the beta.mgh file is correct. That contrast will
compute the difference of the groups. Not sure what you mean by the
"slope of the difference".
doug
jorge luis wrote:
Hello all
We are comparing the cortical thickness of two groups
with the following fsgd file:
GroupD
no, sorry, it's not that easy. We really expect the whole hemi to be
there and there's no easy way to remove part of it
Bruce
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okey, thanks a lot!
I have another question though: Will Freesurfer (in the automatic cortical
parcellation) always try t
Hi Freesurfers-
I was trying to run freesurfer on a study template and was having
major problems with pial surface generation. Orig and Main surfaces
seem to be ok, but there are major missing chinks in pial surface.
Just to give some background, the template was being using for
Diffeomorphic Imag
I am using Freesurfer to analyze a set of brains of subjects with temporal
lobe epilepsy. The brains are being run at two different locations. In
addition, the brains at one location have been run on two different
computers, with two different freesurfer builds. The problem that I am
having is t
Okey, thanks a lot!
I have another question though: Will Freesurfer (in the automatic cortical
parcellation) always try to parcellate/label all of the cortex? I was
wondering if a solution to the problem could be to either change and
rename the
?h.curvature.buckner40.filled.deskian_killiany.2007-0
Hello all
We are comparing the cortical thickness of two groups
with the following fsgd file:
GroupDescriptorFile 1
Title Thickness-subj
Class contr
Class modif
Input subj1 contr
Input subj2 contr
Input subj3 contr
Input subj4 contr
...
Input subj36 modif
Input subj37 modif
Input subj38