Hi, Bruce
The command line I used is:
mris_fill -r 1 -c rh.white rh.white.nii.gz
I attached the rh.white in my previous mail. Could you see it in the attachment?
Thank you!
Longchuan
From: Bruce Fischl
To: Longchuan Li
Cc: FreeSurfer
Sent: Tuesday, Mar
I could see the created surface in MAtlab ( 'read_surf,) but I could't open
the file in Freesurfer with tksurfer
VP
From: pval...@hotmail.com
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Brainsuite --> FreeSurfer
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 22:34:39 -0400
Hi,
I've done a segmentation with B
Hi,
I've done a segmentation with Brainsuite ( and FreeSurfer) and I would like to
get measurements with FreeSurfer. SO, I convert my rile ( readdfs -->
write_surf ) from BRainsuite in Matlab to be usable with Freesurfer. Then, I
tried to get measurements with the command .'mris_anatomical_stat
actually, I think you need to look up his email at UCSD as his MGH one
bounced
Bruce
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, Alice Burnett wrote:
> Thanks very much, Doug and Bruce!
>
>
>
>
> This e-mail and any attachments to it (the "Communication") are, unless
> otherwise stated, confidential, may contain copy
Thanks very much, Doug and Bruce!
This e-mail and any attachments to it (the "Communication") are, unless
otherwise stated, confidential, may contain copyright material and is for the
use only of the intended recipient. If you receive the Communication in error,
please notify the sender i
can you send your mris_fill command line? And maybe the lh.white surface
you are trying to fill?
Bruce
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013, Longchuan Li wrote:
Hi, Bruce
This is the lh.white that gives me the empty volume when I use mris_fill to
sample it to the volume space. Could you help diagnose what is c
Hi Souheil
I would run the two sets of scans separately; I would expect a T2 bias in
the sample if they are run together with ones that have no T2. Perhaps see
how T2 images influence the output (maybe have a .fsgd file with T2/noT2
as two levels) to see if there are significnt differences- no?
H
Hi Souheil
we usually compute the RMS across echoes and give that to recon-all as a
normal mprage. It's a reasonable (although of course not optimal) weighting
since the earlier echoes have more signal and more contrast.
For the T2s, there's a new post-hoc procedure for deformaing the surfaces
Hi All,
I have some multi-echo mprage images from a sequence and protocol set up to
emulate Andre's 2008 paper. What's are the "best-practices" for using data
from this type of sequence in Freesurfer?
Related side questions:
I have used the suggested morphometry protocols on the FS wiki (1mm
Hi Yolanda,
if you want to simulate a study where one obtains 2 time points (6 months
apart) or 2 time points (12 months apart) and then compare the results, you
would need to run these two independently through free surfers longitudinal
stream (one time including 0 and 6 month, the other time
Hi Doug,
I tried to do what you recommended but I am encountering an inconsistency.
(Note: I obtain the same results in R (with ginv() ) and Matlab (with
pinv() ) )
Could you please have a look at the code and the values please? I don't
know what else to do right now... (it is possible to copy p
Hi Joy-Loi,
yes, you can do that using the free surfer tools (e.g. check if 'atrophy', i.e.
change across the two methods, is different from zero, meaning if there is a
bias).
Any of the statistical methods described here:
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/LongitudinalStatistics
can do
Hello Martin,
Thank you for your swift reply.
I failed to make myself clear, and will try describing my study again.
First, an important point: the study is not longitudinal per se, but I
am interested in applying the methods of longitudinal analysis. I only
have one time point, all the scans
Posting one of the brains.
https://yalesurvey.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_ddwW7I9yMQuCtPn
It seems to me that neither version is perfect; however, 5.2.0 is
capturing more "black spaces" in the region I'm looking at.
It's in the right hemisphere, TAL coordinate about ~ (44, -46, 20).
Given that t
Hi Martin,
Thank you for your answer, but my idea was to compare the atrophy
rates when using scans at 6 months (0 - 6 months) and scans at 12
months (0 - 12 months). If my templates are built with more time
points, the results will be biased, right?
Regards,
Yolanda
2013/3/18 Martin Reuter :
>
15 matches
Mail list logo