Hi Douglas,
Thanks for the reply, this was my thought too. The files have been uploaded.
Thanks!
Jasmin
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Douglas N Greve wrote:
> I'm guessing that the registration failed on it. Can you tar up the
> subject and upload to our file
Hi - Does this directory exist?
ERROR: fio_pushd:
/cluster/neuromind/cat/bects/subjects/pBECTS001/trac/pBECTS001/dlabel/mni
I'd have to see the entire trac-all.log file to tell you for sure. The
first error may show up earlier than the one that causes the crash.
Thanks,
a.y
On Mon, 8 Aug
Hi Barbara - This can be done with mri_vol2surf. The projection that's
described in that passage can be done with --projdist-max -6 6 1, and the
surface smoothing with --surf-fwhm 6. There are other options in
mri_vol2surf, I'd recommend playing with the settings to see what works
better for
I'm guessing that the registration failed on it. Can you tar up the
subject and upload to our file drop (URL) below?
On 08/12/2016 12:00 PM, Jasmin Alves wrote:
> Dear Freesurfer
>
> I encountered an error on the aseg mask for a participant, both
> hemispheres for the aseg appear on one
Yes, but if you have edited your data in any way, FS will notice this
and keep your edits.
On 08/12/2016 11:43 AM, Heidi Foo wrote:
> Hi Allison,
>
> Thanks for the reply. Does that mean I can't use the preprocessed
> images from 5.3 and run it with 6.0 but I'll have to use the raw T1
>
Dear Freesurfer
I encountered an error on the aseg mask for a participant, both hemispheres
for the aseg appear on one hemisphere of the brain mask.
I ran it a few times and I also used different T1s but it consistently
showed this error.
Is there a way I can correct this?
Thanks,
Jasmin
--
Postdoctoral Position at Boston/Children's Hospital & Harvard Medical School
The GaabLab (gaablab.com) at the Laboratories of Cognitive
Neuroscience in collaboration with the Fetal-Neonatal Neuroimaging and
Developmental Science
Hi Allison,
Thanks for the reply. Does that mean I can't use the preprocessed images
from 5.3 and run it with 6.0 but I'll have to use the raw T1 images?
Thanks.
Regards,
Heidi
On Friday, 12 August 2016, Allison Moreau
wrote:
> Hi Heidi,
>
> Once 6.0 is released
Hi Clara,
Try to start qdec in the same directory. If that fails create a qdec sub directory underneath the subjects _dir and put the files there.
Best Martin
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Dear FreeSurfer experts,
I'm trying to run a 2stage Model in QDEC but I have troubles with incorporating
the .Qdecrc file. Sadly the option of spc etc doesn't show up the Design tab
when I want to chose a measure.
the file is in the same directory the table.dat file is in. What might be the
Hi Heidi,
Once 6.0 is released and you have installed it, you can simply source
that version of FreeSurfer and rerun your subjects the same way you did
for 5.3.
Best,
Allison
On 08/12/2016 06:02 AM, Heidi Foo wrote:
Hi FreeSurfer Team,
I have done recon-all using FS 5.3 and I would like
Dear experts,
I am in trouble with two ways of computing mean intensity with mri_segstats.
First I have used on .annot files with three different labels inside (SegId
1 to 3) :
*mri_segstats --annot fsaverage lh cache.th23.pos.sig.ocn.annot --i
lh.PET.fsaverage.sm10.mgh --sum lh.pet.sum*
which
Hi FreeSurfer Team,
I have done recon-all using FS 5.3 and I would like to run the recon-ed
images from 5.3 in FS 6.0. May I know how I should go about doing that?
Thank you.
Regards,
Heidi Foo
___
Freesurfer mailing list
The error is:
"Mapping unhit to unknown. Found 137851 unhit vertices". The file is made, but
when trying to select it from the annotation tab in Freeview, Freeview crashes
too.
Regards, Caroline
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Hi Kaja.
This is not an answer from the official group, but I am used to linux so i ve
seen this error before.
This particular error is printed out when the GL installation doesn't include
the GLX extensions in an X window environment (GLX not found. Aborting.). Check
to see if there are any
Dear FreeSurfer experts,
I have a question regarding manual interventions during the recon-all
script of FreeSurfer 5.3.0 (i.e. setting control points, performing white
matter edits). How can we check for inter- and intra-rater reliability?
In an earlier post you mentioned an intra- and
16 matches
Mail list logo