Also I should add: I am running freesurfer from a Linux subsystem for Windows.
Matlab was installed to Windows before obtaining freesurfer.
Best,
Idil
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] on behalf of
It says that it's not on the path. I thought export MATLAB would fix that issue
but apparently not.
Best,
Idil
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] on behalf of Douglas N Greve
what happens if you run the getmatlab command?
If you don't have a startup.m, then create one
On 09/20/2017 04:34 PM, Yagmur Ozdemir 19 wrote:
> Hello freesurfer experts,
>
> When I run the selxavg3-sess command (for retinotopy) , the command
> exits with this
>
Hello freesurfer experts,
When I run the selxavg3-sess command (for retinotopy) , the command exits with
this
"fast_selxavg3b('/mnt/c/Users/yagmuridil/Desktop/freesurfer/Project/Sess01/bold/rtopy.self.lh/sxa3.config.txt')
if(~fast_fileexists('/tmp/selxavg3-sess-3166.ok')); quit; end"
and then
Hi Douglas:
I am looking for papers that used the volume of each lobe computed
using freesurfer, but I couldn't found it... Do you know any?...
Sincerely,
Gonzalo Rojas Costa
Laboratory for Advanced Medical Image Processing
Department of Radiology
Clínica las Condes
Lo Fontecilla 441, Las
We did not have a strong reason, just that it seemed to give maps that
looked reasonable
On 09/20/2017 04:42 PM, Gonzalo Rojas Costa wrote:
> Hi Douglas:
>
>Why you specified 5mm as the default value for the --wmparc-dmax
> option in mri_aparc2aseg command?
>
>Sincerely,
>
>
> Gonzalo
Hi Douglas:
Why you specified 5mm as the default value for the --wmparc-dmax
option in mri_aparc2aseg command?
Sincerely,
Gonzalo Rojas Costa
Laboratory for Advanced Medical Image Processing
Department of Radiology
Clínica las Condes
Lo Fontecilla 441, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile.
Tel:
Hello Freesurfer experts,
I have performed a group level analysis of volume and cortical thickness
using mri_glmfit and performed multiple comparisons correction with
mri_glmfit-sim. I used the contrast matrix 0 1 0 to analyze 1 group with 2
covariates, along the 1st covariate (education) with
FYI
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 16:53:34 +
From: Mert Sabuncu
To: Bruce Fischl
Subject: Cornell Weill is hiring new faculty in MR
Hi Bruce,
Can you forward to folks?
Thx!
It looks like just wrong window/level setting in freeview. Have you
tried adjust it? You can do it semi-automatically by drawing a ROI with
Ctrl + middle mouse button on the slice.
On 09/20/2017 12:12 PM, Linnea Marie Dramdal Borg wrote:
Hi,
My apologies, freeview_T207_dtifit_FA.nii.gz.png
Hi Angel,
It appears you're running freeview from FS v5.3, which is over 4 years
old. Anyway you can try v6.0 or the latest dev build?
Best,
Rubin
On 09/20/2017 10:19 AM, Torrado Carvajal, Angel wrote:
Good morning,
We have been experiencing a weird behavior in Freeview when loading non
Hi Amanda,
I would recommend you to quantify reliability using the same processing
pipeline you will use to test for longitudinal effects in your sample.
Relevant literature include those listed below. For reliability you
would want to evaluate subjects over a time period in which you do not
it should be exact
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017, Fereshte wrote:
Does it give the exact volume ( the volume which the surface was made from) or
it gives an
approximation of the volume? ( the toolboxes I've already worked with for such
a purpose; give poor
approximations).
Thank you!
On Tue, Sep
I don't think surf2surf knows how to deal with patches. We always flatten
the individual subject surfaces. You could make a label from the patch and
map that across subjects with label2label, then use label2patch to turn it
into a patch, then flatten it
cheers
Bruce
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017,
Hi Amanda
it really depends what your goal is. If you want to estimate the noise
for a power analysis and you are going to process the data longitudinally,
then certainly you should use the longitudinal stream to measure the
reliability
cheers
Bruce
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017, Worker, Amanda
Hi all,
I have a longitudinal dataset that I'd like to calculate test-retest
reliability for. However, I am not sure whether to calculate this for the
cross-sectionally processed data or longitudinal data? It would seem to make
sense to use the cross-sectional data, as the time points are
Hi Fereshte,
mris_volume does not create any output files, that number you see in the
terminal is the total volume of a given closed surface.
Try running mris_volume -v instead and you will see something
like this in your terminal:
reading ...
surface file read in.
Volume computation took
17 matches
Mail list logo